{"title":"The Efficacy of Thyrotropin Suppression Therapy in Treatment of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer after Total Thyroidectomy","authors":"Niveen Abotouk, D. Zayed","doi":"10.1515/fco-2015-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the effect of the TSH suppression on both disease-free and overall survivals in patients with nonmetastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) after total thyroidectomy. Patients & Methods: One hundred and forty eight patients with pathologically proved operable differentiated thyroid carcinoma were enrolled in this prospective study. Levothyroxin (L-T4) therapy was started in doses according to treatment groups. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either postoperative TSH suppression therapy in group I (76 patients) or nonsuppression therapy in group II (72 patients). Results: During the period of follow up with a median 54 months, the disease-free survival for patients without TSH suppression therapy did not reach statistically significant difference comparing with those for patients with the suppression therapy (p=0.09). However, the difference was statistically significant for high-risk patients (p=0.04). On comparing both groups there was no statistically significant difference with regard to overall survival (p=0.17). The age of the patients more than 45 years, tumour size more than 4 cm and high-risk group were significant independent predictors for thyroid carcinoma-related relapse in univariate analysis. However, tumour size was the only significant factor in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Suppressive treatment with L-T4 therapy in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma should be individualised and balanced against the adverse effects. TSH suppression is indicated in patients with high-risk disease or recurrent tumour. Normalisation of serum TSH is preferred for long-term treatment of disease-free elderly patients with DTC and comorbidities.","PeriodicalId":38592,"journal":{"name":"Forum of Clinical Oncology","volume":"6 1","pages":"24 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/fco-2015-0010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fco-2015-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Background: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the effect of the TSH suppression on both disease-free and overall survivals in patients with nonmetastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) after total thyroidectomy. Patients & Methods: One hundred and forty eight patients with pathologically proved operable differentiated thyroid carcinoma were enrolled in this prospective study. Levothyroxin (L-T4) therapy was started in doses according to treatment groups. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either postoperative TSH suppression therapy in group I (76 patients) or nonsuppression therapy in group II (72 patients). Results: During the period of follow up with a median 54 months, the disease-free survival for patients without TSH suppression therapy did not reach statistically significant difference comparing with those for patients with the suppression therapy (p=0.09). However, the difference was statistically significant for high-risk patients (p=0.04). On comparing both groups there was no statistically significant difference with regard to overall survival (p=0.17). The age of the patients more than 45 years, tumour size more than 4 cm and high-risk group were significant independent predictors for thyroid carcinoma-related relapse in univariate analysis. However, tumour size was the only significant factor in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Suppressive treatment with L-T4 therapy in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma should be individualised and balanced against the adverse effects. TSH suppression is indicated in patients with high-risk disease or recurrent tumour. Normalisation of serum TSH is preferred for long-term treatment of disease-free elderly patients with DTC and comorbidities.