Single Fraction versus Multiple Fraction Radiotherapy for treatment of painful bone metastases: A Prospective Study; Mansoura experience

Q4 Medicine Forum of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2015-06-01 DOI:10.1515/fco-2015-0007
A. Anter
{"title":"Single Fraction versus Multiple Fraction Radiotherapy for treatment of painful bone metastases: A Prospective Study; Mansoura experience","authors":"A. Anter","doi":"10.1515/fco-2015-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose: Assessment of pain response in patients with bone metastasis after treating with two radiation schedules and to compare toxicity profile in both arms. Patients & Methods: A prospective randomised study was designed to include 100 patients from May 2011 to May 2013. Patients with histopathologically proven primary malignancy having symptomatic secondary deposits to bone were selected for the study. Patients were randomised to 8 Gy in a single fraction (arm A) or 20 Gy in five fractions (arm B). Initial pain response was assessed using numeric rating scale, and compared using the same scale 3 months after completion of treatment. Acute toxicities were assessed using the radiation therapy oncology group criteria for adverse events Results: Arm A comprised 51 patients while 49 patients were enrolled in Arm B. Baseline patient characteristics were comparable. Twelve patients were lost to follow-up. So the 3-month pain score assessment was completed by 88 of the 100 patients; A complete response was observed in 20.4% (18 patients) of the 88 patients, and partial response was observed in 54.5% (48 patients), for an overall response rate of 75% (66 of 88 patients); only 10% (9 patients) of the 88 patients had progression of pain. Mild GI toxicity was noted in both arms but differences in two arms were not statistically significant (p = 0.45), no interruption of treatment was required because of side effects. Conclusions: In our study, we found both the radiation fractionation schedules for palliative bone metastasis treatment is equally effective in pain control.","PeriodicalId":38592,"journal":{"name":"Forum of Clinical Oncology","volume":"36 1","pages":"13 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fco-2015-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Assessment of pain response in patients with bone metastasis after treating with two radiation schedules and to compare toxicity profile in both arms. Patients & Methods: A prospective randomised study was designed to include 100 patients from May 2011 to May 2013. Patients with histopathologically proven primary malignancy having symptomatic secondary deposits to bone were selected for the study. Patients were randomised to 8 Gy in a single fraction (arm A) or 20 Gy in five fractions (arm B). Initial pain response was assessed using numeric rating scale, and compared using the same scale 3 months after completion of treatment. Acute toxicities were assessed using the radiation therapy oncology group criteria for adverse events Results: Arm A comprised 51 patients while 49 patients were enrolled in Arm B. Baseline patient characteristics were comparable. Twelve patients were lost to follow-up. So the 3-month pain score assessment was completed by 88 of the 100 patients; A complete response was observed in 20.4% (18 patients) of the 88 patients, and partial response was observed in 54.5% (48 patients), for an overall response rate of 75% (66 of 88 patients); only 10% (9 patients) of the 88 patients had progression of pain. Mild GI toxicity was noted in both arms but differences in two arms were not statistically significant (p = 0.45), no interruption of treatment was required because of side effects. Conclusions: In our study, we found both the radiation fractionation schedules for palliative bone metastasis treatment is equally effective in pain control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单段放疗与多段放疗治疗疼痛性骨转移的前瞻性研究收住曼苏拉经验科
目的:评估两种放疗方案治疗后骨转移患者的疼痛反应,并比较两组患者的毒性。患者和方法:2011年5月至2013年5月,设计了一项前瞻性随机研究,纳入100例患者。组织病理学证实的原发性恶性肿瘤有继发性骨沉积症状的患者被选为研究对象。患者被随机分为8 Gy的单组(a组)或20 Gy的5组(B组)。使用数值评定量表评估初始疼痛反应,并在治疗完成3个月后使用相同的量表进行比较。急性毒性使用放射治疗肿瘤组不良事件标准进行评估结果:A组包括51例患者,b组纳入49例患者。基线患者特征具有可比性。12例患者未随访。100名患者中有88人完成了3个月的疼痛评分评估;88例患者中有20.4%(18例)出现完全缓解,54.5%(48例)出现部分缓解,总缓解率为75%(88例患者中有66例);88例患者中只有10%(9例)出现疼痛进展。两组均有轻微的胃肠道毒性,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.45),没有因副作用而需要中断治疗。结论:在我们的研究中,我们发现姑息性骨转移治疗的两种放射分级方案在疼痛控制方面同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forum of Clinical Oncology
Forum of Clinical Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Breast cancer recurrence and tumor size: A bibliometric analysis Outcomes of patients with localized prostate cancer treated with combined external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost: A single-center retrospective study Glomerulonephritis as a paraneoplastic event from prostate cancer relapse Change of dosing paradigm in oncology Total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a review across studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1