Efficacy and Toxicity of Maintenance Pemetrexed Following Induction Treatment with Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin for Advanced Non-small-cell Non-squamous Carcinoma of the Lung

Q4 Medicine Forum of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2015-06-01 DOI:10.1515/fco-2015-0008
D. Kim, A. Kinmond, S. Gilani, S. Giridharan, A. Jegannathen
{"title":"Efficacy and Toxicity of Maintenance Pemetrexed Following Induction Treatment with Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin for Advanced Non-small-cell Non-squamous Carcinoma of the Lung","authors":"D. Kim, A. Kinmond, S. Gilani, S. Giridharan, A. Jegannathen","doi":"10.1515/fco-2015-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and toxicity of maintenance pemetrexed following induction treatment with cisplatin and pemetrexed for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients following four cycles of intravenous pemetrexed (Alimpta©; 500 mg/m2) and intravenous cisplatin (75 mg/m2) were given 21-day cycles of maintenance pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) until disease progression, unacceptable adverse event or death. From a total 80 patients receiving palliative induction chemotherapy, 17 subsequently received maintenance pemetrexed. RESULTS: The mean number of maintenance cycles completed was 5.9 (range 1-20; median 3.0). The mean progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.2 months (range: 2-15; median: 2.0) and the 1-year PFS was 17%. Treatment was discontinued due to disease progression (71%), adverse event (21%) and death from study disease (7%). Grade 3-4 laboratory and non-laboratory adverse events were seen in 11.8 and 17.6% of patients, respectively. Anaemia was the most common adverse event (71% of all patients; 65% grade 1-2; 5.9% grade 3-4). The most common reason for withdrawal due to adverse event was declining renal function. There was a statistically significant correlation between worsening performance status and reducing number of maintenance cycles completed (Spearman’s rank; R = −0.511, p = 0.036). DISCUSSION: The median PFS was lower than in previous studies with a higher than previously reported frequency of adverse events. Clinicians must monitor renal function and full blood counts vigilantly, especially in patients with performance status greater than 0.","PeriodicalId":38592,"journal":{"name":"Forum of Clinical Oncology","volume":"6 1","pages":"14 - 18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fco-2015-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and toxicity of maintenance pemetrexed following induction treatment with cisplatin and pemetrexed for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients following four cycles of intravenous pemetrexed (Alimpta©; 500 mg/m2) and intravenous cisplatin (75 mg/m2) were given 21-day cycles of maintenance pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) until disease progression, unacceptable adverse event or death. From a total 80 patients receiving palliative induction chemotherapy, 17 subsequently received maintenance pemetrexed. RESULTS: The mean number of maintenance cycles completed was 5.9 (range 1-20; median 3.0). The mean progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.2 months (range: 2-15; median: 2.0) and the 1-year PFS was 17%. Treatment was discontinued due to disease progression (71%), adverse event (21%) and death from study disease (7%). Grade 3-4 laboratory and non-laboratory adverse events were seen in 11.8 and 17.6% of patients, respectively. Anaemia was the most common adverse event (71% of all patients; 65% grade 1-2; 5.9% grade 3-4). The most common reason for withdrawal due to adverse event was declining renal function. There was a statistically significant correlation between worsening performance status and reducing number of maintenance cycles completed (Spearman’s rank; R = −0.511, p = 0.036). DISCUSSION: The median PFS was lower than in previous studies with a higher than previously reported frequency of adverse events. Clinicians must monitor renal function and full blood counts vigilantly, especially in patients with performance status greater than 0.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培美曲塞联合顺铂诱导后维持培美曲塞治疗晚期非小细胞非鳞状肺癌的疗效和毒性
摘要简介:本研究的目的是评估顺铂和培美曲塞诱导治疗后维持培美曲塞对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效和毒性。患者和方法:符合条件的患者静脉注射培美曲塞(Alimpta©;500 mg/m2)和静脉顺铂(75 mg/m2)给予21天周期的培美曲塞(500 mg/m2)维持治疗,直到疾病进展、不可接受的不良事件或死亡。在接受姑息性诱导化疗的80例患者中,17例随后接受培美曲塞维持治疗。结果:完成的平均维持周期数为5.9(范围1-20;中位数3.0)。平均无进展生存期(PFS)为5.2个月(范围:2-15;中位数:2.0),1年PFS为17%。由于疾病进展(71%)、不良事件(21%)和研究疾病死亡(7%)而停止治疗。3-4级实验室和非实验室不良事件发生率分别为11.8%和17.6%。贫血是最常见的不良事件(占所有患者的71%;1-2级65%;5.9%(3-4年级)。由于不良事件导致停药的最常见原因是肾功能下降。性能状态恶化与完成维修周期次数减少之间存在统计学上显著的相关性(Spearman等级;R =−0.511,p = 0.036)。讨论:中位PFS低于先前的研究,但不良事件发生率高于先前报道。临床医生必须警惕监测肾功能和全血细胞计数,特别是在性能状态大于0的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forum of Clinical Oncology
Forum of Clinical Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Breast cancer recurrence and tumor size: A bibliometric analysis Outcomes of patients with localized prostate cancer treated with combined external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost: A single-center retrospective study Glomerulonephritis as a paraneoplastic event from prostate cancer relapse Change of dosing paradigm in oncology Total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a review across studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1