{"title":"Isozyme evidence regarding relationships within Rhizomnium (Mniaceae)","authors":"R. Wyatt, I. Odrzykoski, A. Stoneburner","doi":"10.1639/0007-2745-126.1.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. One of the two most speciose genera in the Mniaceae, Rhizomnium includes 14 to 16 named taxa with the likelihood that more remain to be described. Our previous research established that R. pseudopunctatum is an allodiploid whose haploid progenitors are R. gracile and R. magnifolium. In the course of that work, we sampled five additional species as possible progenitors. Using isozymes from starch-gel electrophoresis, we screened all eight species to compare levels of genetic variation within species, genetic distances between species, and genetic population structure. Levels of variation are generally lower than for species of Plagiomnium but are similar to those for species of Cinclidium. Relationships of species based on genetic data are mostly congruent with Koponen's (1973) “assumed phylogeny” of Rhizomnium, but there are also some clear conflicts. For example, R. appalachianum is highly divergent from the other three species placed in sect. Macromnium, and R. glabrescens does not seem to fit in sect. Rhizomnium. Genetic distance data, however, do support Koponen & Sun's (2016) recognition of R. chlorophyllosum as a separate species from R. punctatum.","PeriodicalId":55319,"journal":{"name":"Bryologist","volume":"126 1","pages":"45 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bryologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745-126.1.045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract. One of the two most speciose genera in the Mniaceae, Rhizomnium includes 14 to 16 named taxa with the likelihood that more remain to be described. Our previous research established that R. pseudopunctatum is an allodiploid whose haploid progenitors are R. gracile and R. magnifolium. In the course of that work, we sampled five additional species as possible progenitors. Using isozymes from starch-gel electrophoresis, we screened all eight species to compare levels of genetic variation within species, genetic distances between species, and genetic population structure. Levels of variation are generally lower than for species of Plagiomnium but are similar to those for species of Cinclidium. Relationships of species based on genetic data are mostly congruent with Koponen's (1973) “assumed phylogeny” of Rhizomnium, but there are also some clear conflicts. For example, R. appalachianum is highly divergent from the other three species placed in sect. Macromnium, and R. glabrescens does not seem to fit in sect. Rhizomnium. Genetic distance data, however, do support Koponen & Sun's (2016) recognition of R. chlorophyllosum as a separate species from R. punctatum.
期刊介绍:
The Bryologist is an international journal devoted to all aspects of bryology and lichenology, and we welcome reviews, research papers and short communications from all members of American Bryological and Lichenological Society (ABLS). We also publish lists of current literature, book reviews and news items about members and event. All back issues of the journal are maintained electronically. The first issue of The Bryologist was published in 1898, with the formation of the Society.
Author instructions are available from the journal website and the manuscript submission site, each of which is listed at the ABLS.org website.
All submissions to the journal are subject to at least two peer reviews, and both the reviews and the identities of reviewers are treated confidentially. Reviewers are asked to acknowledge possible conflicts of interest and to provide strictly objective assessments of the suitability and scholarly merit of the submissions under review.