Slow & Steady: A Gradual Approach to Federalization of Grid Regulation

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Ecology Law Quarterly Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI:10.15779/Z383588
Purba Mukerjee
{"title":"Slow & Steady: A Gradual Approach to Federalization of Grid Regulation","authors":"Purba Mukerjee","doi":"10.15779/Z383588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the absence of meaningful state-level solutions, there is a pressing need for federal action to address regional and global environmental issues like ozone pollution and climate change. Answering this call, the Environmental Protection Agency has recently promulgated aggressive regulations under the Clean Air Act. These rules entail federal reach into traditional areas of state authority, particularly in the energy sector, and the Supreme Court has indicated that it might tolerate such strong-handed federal control where states have been shirking their statutory responsibilities. However, in light of the legal shift towards federalization of energy regulation, this Note cautions against initial federal regulations that dramatically constrain states’ discretion in electricity and environmental planning. Such an approach would constitute an abrupt shift from state to federal jurisdiction over aspects of the electricity grid. Because states still have an important role in ensuring electricity reliability and affordability, this Note proposes that federal agencies, when occupying areas of traditional state control for the first time, promulgate rules and standards that still preserve much of states’ regulatory flexibility. Then, in subsequent regulations, federal agencies can expand their reach by setting more stringent standards and limiting state options for compliance. This will allow for more enduring and effective federal regulation and enable both states and the federal government to ensure a clean, affordable, and reliable electricity grid.","PeriodicalId":45532,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Law Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Law Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z383588","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the absence of meaningful state-level solutions, there is a pressing need for federal action to address regional and global environmental issues like ozone pollution and climate change. Answering this call, the Environmental Protection Agency has recently promulgated aggressive regulations under the Clean Air Act. These rules entail federal reach into traditional areas of state authority, particularly in the energy sector, and the Supreme Court has indicated that it might tolerate such strong-handed federal control where states have been shirking their statutory responsibilities. However, in light of the legal shift towards federalization of energy regulation, this Note cautions against initial federal regulations that dramatically constrain states’ discretion in electricity and environmental planning. Such an approach would constitute an abrupt shift from state to federal jurisdiction over aspects of the electricity grid. Because states still have an important role in ensuring electricity reliability and affordability, this Note proposes that federal agencies, when occupying areas of traditional state control for the first time, promulgate rules and standards that still preserve much of states’ regulatory flexibility. Then, in subsequent regulations, federal agencies can expand their reach by setting more stringent standards and limiting state options for compliance. This will allow for more enduring and effective federal regulation and enable both states and the federal government to ensure a clean, affordable, and reliable electricity grid.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缓慢与稳定:电网监管联邦化的渐进途径
在缺乏有意义的州级解决方案的情况下,迫切需要联邦政府采取行动,解决臭氧污染和气候变化等区域和全球环境问题。为了响应这一呼吁,环境保护署最近颁布了《清洁空气法》中的激进规定。这些规定要求联邦政府介入州权力的传统领域,特别是在能源领域,最高法院表示,它可能会容忍这种联邦政府的强力控制,因为各州一直在逃避法定责任。然而,鉴于能源监管向联邦化的法律转变,本报告对最初的联邦法规提出了警告,这些法规极大地限制了各州在电力和环境规划方面的自由裁量权。这样的做法将构成对电网各个方面的管辖权从州向联邦的突然转变。由于各州在确保电力可靠性和可负担性方面仍然发挥着重要作用,本报告建议联邦机构在首次占领传统的州控制领域时,颁布仍然保留各州监管灵活性的规则和标准。然后,在随后的法规中,联邦机构可以通过制定更严格的标准和限制各州的合规选择来扩大其影响范围。这将允许更持久和有效的联邦监管,并使各州和联邦政府能够确保清洁、负担得起和可靠的电网。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ecology Law Quarterly"s primary function is to produce two high quality journals: a quarterly print version and a more frequent, cutting-edge online journal, Ecology Law Currents. UC Berkeley School of Law students manage every aspect of ELQ, from communicating with authors to editing articles to publishing the journals. In addition to featuring work by leading environmental law scholars, ELQ encourages student writing and publishes student pieces.
期刊最新文献
Finding Elegance in Unexpected Places Carbon Dioxide Removal after Paris Vindicating Public Environmental Interest: Defining the Role of Enviornmental Public Interest Litigation in China Opening Reflection: The Elegance of International Law Navigating the Judicialization of International Law in Troubled Waters: Some Reflections on a Generation of International Lawyers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1