Proceso de paz con las FARC-EP: una aproximación desde el uso pedagógico de ciertas polémicas públicas

Claudia Marcela Hernández Guzmán
{"title":"Proceso de paz con las FARC-EP: una aproximación desde el uso pedagógico de ciertas polémicas públicas","authors":"Claudia Marcela Hernández Guzmán","doi":"10.17227/pys.num54-11802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout the recent peace process between the Colombian Government and farc-ep, various discursive situations acquired a controversial or polemical character. These situations, in light of the plebiscite held in 2016 to endorse the Final Agreement, seemed counterproductive to the positive outcome of the process. The purpose of this article is to analyze the pedagogical use that the Office of the High Commissioner for Peace gave to certain scenarios of public polemics, which took on a significant media force within the framework of Peace Pedagogy. Based on the selection of audiovisual and written material, we propose a reconstruction of certain discourses that were opposed to the peace process and of the counterarguments developed by the Colombian government, in order to highlight possible relations between the “pedagogic dispositive” and the public polemics. Finally, we point out that public polemics can be understood in terms of their pedagogical potential, which allow the opening of argumentation scenarios and a consequent resignification of knowledge and (re)configuration of identities.","PeriodicalId":31021,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogia y Saberes","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogia y Saberes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17227/pys.num54-11802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Throughout the recent peace process between the Colombian Government and farc-ep, various discursive situations acquired a controversial or polemical character. These situations, in light of the plebiscite held in 2016 to endorse the Final Agreement, seemed counterproductive to the positive outcome of the process. The purpose of this article is to analyze the pedagogical use that the Office of the High Commissioner for Peace gave to certain scenarios of public polemics, which took on a significant media force within the framework of Peace Pedagogy. Based on the selection of audiovisual and written material, we propose a reconstruction of certain discourses that were opposed to the peace process and of the counterarguments developed by the Colombian government, in order to highlight possible relations between the “pedagogic dispositive” and the public polemics. Finally, we point out that public polemics can be understood in terms of their pedagogical potential, which allow the opening of argumentation scenarios and a consequent resignification of knowledge and (re)configuration of identities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与哥伦比亚革命武装力量-人民军的和平进程:从某些公共辩论的教学使用的方法
在最近哥伦比亚政府与哥伦比亚革命武装力量-人民军之间的和平进程中,各种言论情况都具有争议性或论战性。鉴于2016年为批准《最终协议》而举行的公民投票,这些情况似乎不利于该进程取得积极成果。本文的目的是分析和平事务高级专员办事处对公共辩论的某些情景的教学用途,这些情景在和平教学法的框架内成为重要的媒体力量。根据所选的视听和文字资料,我们建议重建某些反对和平进程的话语,以及哥伦比亚政府提出的反对意见,以强调“教育决定”与公众辩论之间可能存在的关系。最后,我们指出,公共论战可以从其教学潜力的角度来理解,它允许辩论场景的开放,以及随之而来的知识的重新定义和身份的(重新)配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Basal cell carcinoma and rosacea: coincidence or relationship? La noción de niño en el Emilio: una lectura cruzada entre Rousseau y Deleuze Autoevaluación y formación del ser en la universidad: revisión narrativa A Sociologia como disciplina escolar no Brasil: uma leitura a partir das reformas educacionais Los usos del saber. Una revisión al pensamiento educativo de Max Stirner en torno a una discusión pedagógica clásica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1