La organización informal en los equipos innovadores: un estudio de caso comparativo

IF 0.7 Q4 BUSINESS AD-minister Pub Date : 2016-09-08 DOI:10.17230/AD-MINISTER.29.9
C. López, Lina Marcela Guevara, Jorge Robledo Velásquez
{"title":"La organización informal en los equipos innovadores: un estudio de caso comparativo","authors":"C. López, Lina Marcela Guevara, Jorge Robledo Velásquez","doi":"10.17230/AD-MINISTER.29.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a comparative, mixed, transversal and descriptive study based on a multilevel model of psychosocial factors to identify, evaluate and comprehend the dynamics of the informal organization in company innovation. The research is done at a team level through the application of the model instruments. Teams, for comparison purposes, are classified as “innovative” and “non-innovative” based on their practice of innovative activities as recognized by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Due to the non-parametric distribution of variables, the statistics Test U of Mann Whitney is used to identify the differences. The sample corresponds to 70 teams, formed by 563 people from 21 companies. The study finds there are differences in the factors of cohesion, potency and learning climate between the teams that do innovation activities and those which do not, as well as differences in the leadership factors between teams that do Research and Development activities and those which do other types of innovation activities. A comparative multi-case between four “innovative” teams from two companies is developed to better understand the relationship of these factors with innovation. The results provide evidence of the relationship existing between the cultural factors and the psychosocial factors of potency and learning climate.","PeriodicalId":42371,"journal":{"name":"AD-minister","volume":"1 1","pages":"177-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AD-minister","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17230/AD-MINISTER.29.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article presents a comparative, mixed, transversal and descriptive study based on a multilevel model of psychosocial factors to identify, evaluate and comprehend the dynamics of the informal organization in company innovation. The research is done at a team level through the application of the model instruments. Teams, for comparison purposes, are classified as “innovative” and “non-innovative” based on their practice of innovative activities as recognized by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Due to the non-parametric distribution of variables, the statistics Test U of Mann Whitney is used to identify the differences. The sample corresponds to 70 teams, formed by 563 people from 21 companies. The study finds there are differences in the factors of cohesion, potency and learning climate between the teams that do innovation activities and those which do not, as well as differences in the leadership factors between teams that do Research and Development activities and those which do other types of innovation activities. A comparative multi-case between four “innovative” teams from two companies is developed to better understand the relationship of these factors with innovation. The results provide evidence of the relationship existing between the cultural factors and the psychosocial factors of potency and learning climate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创新团队中的非正式组织:一个比较案例研究
本文提出了一种基于多层次社会心理因素模型的比较、混合、横向和描述性研究,以识别、评估和理解非正式组织在公司创新中的动态。该研究是通过应用模型仪器在团队层面上完成的。为便于比较,根据经济合作与发展组织(经合发组织)认可的创新活动实践,将团队分为“创新”和“非创新”两类。由于变量的非参数分布,使用Mann Whitney的统计检验U来识别差异。样本对应了来自21家公司的563人组成的70个团队。研究发现,从事创新活动的团队与不从事创新活动的团队在凝聚力、效力、学习氛围等因素上存在差异,从事研发活动的团队与从事其他类型创新活动的团队在领导力因素上存在差异。为了更好地理解这些因素与创新之间的关系,本文对来自两家公司的四个“创新”团队进行了多案例比较。研究结果证明了文化因素与学习效能、学习氛围等社会心理因素之间存在一定的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AD-minister
AD-minister BUSINESS-
自引率
55.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Entrepreneurial Intentions in the Caribbean: Antecedents and Variations Enterprise and entrepreneurship in peripheral contexts: experiences and prospects from the caribbean small island developing states The Pursuit of Entrepreneurship by Youths in the Caribbean Posibles acciones de actores público-privados hacia un desarrollo regenerativo de negocios, en escenarios futuros Strategic Opportunities Aspect of CSR for Improving Location Advantages in Developed and Emerging Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1