POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS OF CULTURAL STUDIES FOR RETHINKING THE SOVIET HERITAGE

A. Krivolap
{"title":"POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS OF CULTURAL STUDIES FOR RETHINKING THE SOVIET HERITAGE","authors":"A. Krivolap","doi":"10.17721/ucs.2021.2(9).04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the answer to the question how that became possible when culturology was translated into English as Culture stud- ies? There is no danger of losing something in translation, there is a huge conceptual mistake. The work is devoted to the problem of specific cul- tural forms of adaptation and using terms of culturology. There is a deep and large challenge for social and cultural discourse reflex and explain the difference between culturology and culture studies. The purpose of this text is to describe this academic discourse of culturology and to under- stand the conditions for the possibility of its existence and underline some differences from culture studies. Culturology was proposed in the west- ern academic tradition but broadly adopted and welcomed in post-Soviet space. Culturology can be understood as a broad social and cultural phenomenon that brings deep consequences to society in transition. The post- Soviet reality can be studied in the frame of postcolonial discourse and culturology will have a chance for new-born again to solve new social chal- lenges. Against the background of serious values about the Soviet past, the critical attitude to Soviet aesthetics does not seem unexpected. Re- thinking the Soviet past should begin not with political or economic aspects, but with aesthetic and cultural issues. The discourse of culturology contributes to the creation of a certain vision of the social and physical realities. We will try to consider this process by the example of the ap- proach of culturology to the problem of identity. It is interesting that different visions, what cultural identity is, exist simultaneously. On the one hand, cultural identity is considered as a normative requirement to meet certain socio-cultural requirements, historical ideals that have been tested for centuries and strive for their revival. But, on the other hand, cultural identity is interpreted as an endless process of social formation and the search for answers to new questions and social challenges. The first approach is more typical for culturology, and the second – for culture studies.","PeriodicalId":52653,"journal":{"name":"Ukrayins''ki kul''turologichni studiyi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrayins''ki kul''turologichni studiyi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/ucs.2021.2(9).04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the answer to the question how that became possible when culturology was translated into English as Culture stud- ies? There is no danger of losing something in translation, there is a huge conceptual mistake. The work is devoted to the problem of specific cul- tural forms of adaptation and using terms of culturology. There is a deep and large challenge for social and cultural discourse reflex and explain the difference between culturology and culture studies. The purpose of this text is to describe this academic discourse of culturology and to under- stand the conditions for the possibility of its existence and underline some differences from culture studies. Culturology was proposed in the west- ern academic tradition but broadly adopted and welcomed in post-Soviet space. Culturology can be understood as a broad social and cultural phenomenon that brings deep consequences to society in transition. The post- Soviet reality can be studied in the frame of postcolonial discourse and culturology will have a chance for new-born again to solve new social chal- lenges. Against the background of serious values about the Soviet past, the critical attitude to Soviet aesthetics does not seem unexpected. Re- thinking the Soviet past should begin not with political or economic aspects, but with aesthetic and cultural issues. The discourse of culturology contributes to the creation of a certain vision of the social and physical realities. We will try to consider this process by the example of the ap- proach of culturology to the problem of identity. It is interesting that different visions, what cultural identity is, exist simultaneously. On the one hand, cultural identity is considered as a normative requirement to meet certain socio-cultural requirements, historical ideals that have been tested for centuries and strive for their revival. But, on the other hand, cultural identity is interpreted as an endless process of social formation and the search for answers to new questions and social challenges. The first approach is more typical for culturology, and the second – for culture studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新思考苏联遗产的文化研究的可能性与局限性
这篇文章致力于回答这样一个问题:当cultulogy被翻译成英语为Culture stud- ies时,这是如何成为可能的?在翻译中没有丢失东西的危险,有一个巨大的概念错误。这项工作致力于特定的文化形式的适应和使用文化术语的问题。社会文化话语反思和解释文化学与文化研究之间的差异是一个深刻而巨大的挑战。本文的目的是描述这种文化学术话语,了解其存在可能性的条件,并强调与文化研究的一些差异。文化学是在西方学术传统中提出的,但在后苏联时代被广泛采用和欢迎。文化学可以被理解为一种广泛的社会和文化现象,它给转型中的社会带来深刻的影响。后苏联现实可以在后殖民话语的框架中进行研究,文化将有机会再次为新生儿解决新的社会挑战。在对苏联过去的严肃价值观的背景下,对苏联美学的批判态度似乎并不出人意料。重新思考苏联的过去不应该从政治或经济方面开始,而应该从美学和文化问题开始。文化话语有助于创造对社会和物质现实的某种看法。我们将试着以研究认同问题的文化方法为例来考虑这个过程。有趣的是,不同的观点,什么是文化认同,同时存在。一方面,文化认同被认为是满足某些社会文化要求和历史理想的规范性要求,这些社会文化要求和历史理想经过了几个世纪的考验,并力求复兴。但是,另一方面,文化认同被解释为一个永无止境的社会形成过程,以及对新问题和社会挑战的答案的探索。第一种方法在文化学中更为典型,第二种方法在文化研究中更为典型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE FIELD OF CULTURE UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF THE RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN WAR: CULTURAL ASPECT SAVING UKRAINIAN CULTURAL HERITAGE DURING THE WAR: PRACTICES OF INTERNATIONAL INTERACTIONS THEME OF THE WAR IN FINE ARTS: PECULIARITY OF HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL TRANSFORMATIONS MOBILE APP DESIGN FUNCTIONALITY WITH DIGITALIZED CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECTS OF KHARKIV CITY AND KHARKIV REGION FROM "RED" TO "NEW" CULTURE: TRADITION AND INNOVATIONS IN CHINESE MARXISM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1