Evaluating the Feasibility of Using Remote Technology for Cochlear Implants.

Jenny L. Goehring, M. Hughes, Jacquelyn L. Baudhuin
{"title":"Evaluating the Feasibility of Using Remote Technology for Cochlear Implants.","authors":"Jenny L. Goehring, M. Hughes, Jacquelyn L. Baudhuin","doi":"10.17955/TVR.112.3.M.703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of remote technology to provide cochlear implant services has gained popularity in recent years. This article contains a review of research evaluating the feasibility of remote service delivery for recipients of cochlear implants. To date, published studies have determined that speech-processor programming levels and other objective tests (electrode impedance and electrically evoked compound action potentials) are equivalent to those obtained in the face-to-face condition. Despite these promising findings, speech perception using remote technology has proven to be more challenging. Previous investigations have evaluated speech perception with recipients of cochlear implants using videoconference (Polycom) equipment in nonsound-treated rooms (due to lack of access to audiological sound booths in rural areas). Results have revealed poorer speech perception scores using remote technology compared to face-to-face results. Additionally, it has been shown that Polycom transmission of a speech stimulus does not cause significant compression for adequate evaluation; rather, poorer results are due to testing performed in nonsound-treated environments. Based on the literature, telepractice is a feasible option for cochlear implant service delivery. Barriers to the wide-spread use of remote services for recipients of cochlear implants include a uniform system for the evaluation of speech perception, validation of services for pediatric recipients and initial activations, license reciprocity, and reimbursement for services.","PeriodicalId":87459,"journal":{"name":"The Volta review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Volta review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17955/TVR.112.3.M.703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The use of remote technology to provide cochlear implant services has gained popularity in recent years. This article contains a review of research evaluating the feasibility of remote service delivery for recipients of cochlear implants. To date, published studies have determined that speech-processor programming levels and other objective tests (electrode impedance and electrically evoked compound action potentials) are equivalent to those obtained in the face-to-face condition. Despite these promising findings, speech perception using remote technology has proven to be more challenging. Previous investigations have evaluated speech perception with recipients of cochlear implants using videoconference (Polycom) equipment in nonsound-treated rooms (due to lack of access to audiological sound booths in rural areas). Results have revealed poorer speech perception scores using remote technology compared to face-to-face results. Additionally, it has been shown that Polycom transmission of a speech stimulus does not cause significant compression for adequate evaluation; rather, poorer results are due to testing performed in nonsound-treated environments. Based on the literature, telepractice is a feasible option for cochlear implant service delivery. Barriers to the wide-spread use of remote services for recipients of cochlear implants include a uniform system for the evaluation of speech perception, validation of services for pediatric recipients and initial activations, license reciprocity, and reimbursement for services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估远程技术用于人工耳蜗植入的可行性。
近年来,利用远程技术提供人工耳蜗植入服务越来越受欢迎。本文综述了评估人工耳蜗受者远程服务提供可行性的研究。迄今为止,已发表的研究已经确定,语音处理器编程水平和其他客观测试(电极阻抗和电诱发复合动作电位)与面对面条件下获得的结果相当。尽管有这些有希望的发现,使用远程技术的语音感知已被证明更具挑战性。先前的调查已经评估了使用视频会议(Polycom)设备的人工耳蜗植入者在非声音处理房间(由于农村地区缺乏使用听力学音箱的机会)的语音感知。结果显示,与面对面的结果相比,使用远程技术的语音感知得分较低。此外,已有研究表明,语音刺激的Polycom传输不会对充分的评估造成显著的压缩;相反,较差的结果是由于在未经声音处理的环境中进行的测试。基于文献,远程实习是人工耳蜗服务提供的一种可行的选择。为人工耳蜗受者广泛使用远程服务的障碍包括统一的语音感知评估系统、儿科受者服务的验证和初始激活、许可互惠和服务报销。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hearing, Speech, and Language in Infants and Toddlers Born Prematurely. Hearing and Its Interaction with Hearing Technology Caregiver Decision-making for School Placement of Children Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing and Children with Other Disabilities: A Global Perspective Parents' Perspectives Regarding Impacts of a Group Intervention for their Children with Hearing Loss Online and Offline Social Capital of Adolescents Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1