Is There an Ableist Paradox in Frontline Workers’ Success Stories About Disability and Work Inclusion?

IF 1.7 Q2 REHABILITATION Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.16993/sjdr.838
C. Lundberg
{"title":"Is There an Ableist Paradox in Frontline Workers’ Success Stories About Disability and Work Inclusion?","authors":"C. Lundberg","doi":"10.16993/sjdr.838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Frontline workers are tasked with enabling the employment of disabled people. They engage with an ableist narrative that constructs disabled people as less worthy, less productive, and subordinate when they formulate contrasting narratives of disabled people as productive and capable workers. To better understand how frontline workers engage with the ableist narrative, focus group interviews were conducted with frontline workers (counsellors, employment specialists, and market coordinators) within the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration. Focus group interviews generate interaction data resulting from discussions amongst informants revealing aspects of frontline work assumed to be otherwise less accessible, such as success stories. The primary finding is that frontline workers bring up success stories when they are talking about disability and work inclusion. Three narrative practices of these success stories are explored, each with specific contexts and circumstances: learning, motivating, and disability branding. While these narratives aim to redress disabled people’s subordinated position, they still display ableist norms, thus suggesting that an ableist paradox exists in frontline workers’ success stories.","PeriodicalId":46073,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Frontline workers are tasked with enabling the employment of disabled people. They engage with an ableist narrative that constructs disabled people as less worthy, less productive, and subordinate when they formulate contrasting narratives of disabled people as productive and capable workers. To better understand how frontline workers engage with the ableist narrative, focus group interviews were conducted with frontline workers (counsellors, employment specialists, and market coordinators) within the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration. Focus group interviews generate interaction data resulting from discussions amongst informants revealing aspects of frontline work assumed to be otherwise less accessible, such as success stories. The primary finding is that frontline workers bring up success stories when they are talking about disability and work inclusion. Three narrative practices of these success stories are explored, each with specific contexts and circumstances: learning, motivating, and disability branding. While these narratives aim to redress disabled people’s subordinated position, they still display ableist norms, thus suggesting that an ableist paradox exists in frontline workers’ success stories.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一线员工关于残疾和工作包容的成功故事是否存在残疾主义悖论?
前线工作人员的任务是协助残疾人士就业。当他们将残疾人描述为有生产力和有能力的工人时,他们参与了一种能力主义的叙事,这种叙事将残疾人构建为不那么有价值、生产力较低和从属的人。为了更好地了解一线工作者是如何参与ableist叙事的,我们对挪威劳工和福利管理局的一线工作者(辅导员、就业专家和市场协调员)进行了焦点小组访谈。焦点小组访谈产生了互动数据,这些数据来自于线人之间的讨论,揭示了一线工作的一些方面,这些方面被认为是不太容易接触到的,比如成功的故事。研究的主要发现是,一线员工在谈论残疾和工作包容时,会提到成功的故事。本文探讨了这些成功故事的三种叙事实践,每一种都有特定的背景和环境:学习、激励和残疾品牌。虽然这些叙述旨在纠正残疾人的从属地位,但它们仍然表现出残疾主义规范,从而表明一线工人的成功故事中存在着残疾主义悖论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Scoping Review of Research Exploring Working Life Practices of People with Disabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic Disability, Race, and Origin Intersectionality in the Doctoral Program: Ableism in Higher Education Numerical Investigation on the Performance of Prosthetic Running Blades by Using Different Materials Prevalence of Premenstrual Syndrome and Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder Among Deaf/Hard-of-Hearing Women with Mood Disorders in Saudi Arabia Layers of Disability Terminology Experiences of People with Disabilities and their Relatives: An Analysis of Dutch Newspapers between 1950–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1