MORPHOLOGICAL ASPECT OF PYOGENIC SPINAL EPIDURAL ABSCESSES. PART I

Q4 Medicine Coluna/ Columna Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/s1808-185120222101260738
P. Bazán, J. C. S. Adaro, N. M. Ciccioli, A. O. G. Adaro, R. González
{"title":"MORPHOLOGICAL ASPECT OF PYOGENIC SPINAL EPIDURAL ABSCESSES. PART I","authors":"P. Bazán, J. C. S. Adaro, N. M. Ciccioli, A. O. G. Adaro, R. González","doi":"10.1590/s1808-185120222101260738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background: Pyogenic Spinal Epidural Abscess (PSEA) is difficult to diagnose and can have devastating consequences. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has high sensitivity and specificity, which are further increased with the use of contrast. There are several classifications of vertebral infectious processes, with emphasis on spondylodiscitis. Objective: To analyze the morphological parameters and their reproducibility; and to analyze different resonance imaging sequences. Methods: Using an image database, a morphological classification of PSEA was planned, with five parameters: Region (R), indicating the upper and lower limits of the abscess; Location (U), indicating whether the abscess is anterior or posterior within the canal; Compromise (C), meningeal or content of the structures; Association (A), discitis, osteomyelitis or both; and Perivertebral (P), anterior, lateral or posterior extravertebral abscess. The first three parameters give an idea of the volume of the PSEA, while the last two give the related infectious foci. Thirty-five cases were analyzed using Kappa’s coefficient. Results: The global intra- and interobserver reproducibility was Kappa 0.81. The results for each parameter were as follows: R=0.95, U=0.92, C=0.66, A=0.70 and P=0.80. The first three give a notion of volume and the last two relate to the presence of vertebral infectious foci outside the canal. T2 weighted MRI with contrast was found to be the most effective imaging sequence. Conclusion: The morphological classification is simple to use, with excellent reproducibility. The parameters with the highest reproducibility were region and location, with values >0.92. The addition of gadolinium contrast increased the sensitivity of the diagnosis; the use of sagittal and axial images in T2-MRI was the most sensitive imaging sequence. Evidence Level III; Original.","PeriodicalId":40025,"journal":{"name":"Coluna/ Columna","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coluna/ Columna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1808-185120222101260738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Pyogenic Spinal Epidural Abscess (PSEA) is difficult to diagnose and can have devastating consequences. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has high sensitivity and specificity, which are further increased with the use of contrast. There are several classifications of vertebral infectious processes, with emphasis on spondylodiscitis. Objective: To analyze the morphological parameters and their reproducibility; and to analyze different resonance imaging sequences. Methods: Using an image database, a morphological classification of PSEA was planned, with five parameters: Region (R), indicating the upper and lower limits of the abscess; Location (U), indicating whether the abscess is anterior or posterior within the canal; Compromise (C), meningeal or content of the structures; Association (A), discitis, osteomyelitis or both; and Perivertebral (P), anterior, lateral or posterior extravertebral abscess. The first three parameters give an idea of the volume of the PSEA, while the last two give the related infectious foci. Thirty-five cases were analyzed using Kappa’s coefficient. Results: The global intra- and interobserver reproducibility was Kappa 0.81. The results for each parameter were as follows: R=0.95, U=0.92, C=0.66, A=0.70 and P=0.80. The first three give a notion of volume and the last two relate to the presence of vertebral infectious foci outside the canal. T2 weighted MRI with contrast was found to be the most effective imaging sequence. Conclusion: The morphological classification is simple to use, with excellent reproducibility. The parameters with the highest reproducibility were region and location, with values >0.92. The addition of gadolinium contrast increased the sensitivity of the diagnosis; the use of sagittal and axial images in T2-MRI was the most sensitive imaging sequence. Evidence Level III; Original.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化脓性脊髓硬膜外脓肿的形态学特征。第一部分
背景:化脓性脊髓硬膜外脓肿(PSEA)是一种难以诊断且具有毁灭性后果的疾病。磁共振成像(MRI)具有很高的灵敏度和特异性,并随着造影剂的使用而进一步提高。椎体感染过程有几种分类,重点是脊柱炎。目的:分析其形态参数及其再现性;并分析不同的磁共振成像序列。方法:利用图像数据库,规划PSEA的形态学分类,分为5个参数:区域(R),表示脓肿的上下限;位置(U),表示脓肿位于管内前方还是后方;损害(C),脑膜或内容物的结构;结缔组织(A)、椎间盘炎、骨髓炎或两者兼而有之;和椎周围(P),前,外侧或后椎外脓肿。前三个参数给出了PSEA的体积,后两个参数给出了相关的感染灶。用Kappa系数对35例进行分析。结果:整体观察者内部和观察者之间的重现性Kappa为0.81。各参数的结果如下:R=0.95, U=0.92, C=0.66, A=0.70, P=0.80。前三个给出了体积的概念,后两个涉及椎管外椎体感染灶的存在。T2加权MRI造影剂是最有效的成像序列。结论:形态学分类方法简便,重现性好。重现性最高的参数为地区和地点,其值为>0.92。钆造影剂的加入提高了诊断的敏感性;T2-MRI矢状位和轴位影像是最敏感的成像序列。证据等级III;原创。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Coluna/ Columna
Coluna/ Columna Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS: PROGRESSION OF UNTREATED CASES FUNCTIONALITY OF INDIVIDUALS WITH LOW BACK PAIN: CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY WITH ICF CORE SET ANESTHETIC BLOCK OF THE INTERTRANSVERSE SEPTUM, A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY LUMBAR LORDOSIS VARIATION ACCORDING THE TYPE OF POSITIONER USED IN LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS CLINICAL PHOTOGRAPHIC AND RADIOLOGICAL CORRELATION IN PATIENTS WITH SCOLIOSIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1