Lidia Romero Outeda, Lorenzo Antonio Justo Cousiño, I. D. C. Carrera, E. M. L. Caeiro
{"title":"EFFECT OF THE MAITLAND CONCEPT TECHNIQUES ON LOW BACK PAIN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW","authors":"Lidia Romero Outeda, Lorenzo Antonio Justo Cousiño, I. D. C. Carrera, E. M. L. Caeiro","doi":"10.1590/s1808-185120222102258429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Low back pain has a prevalence that reaches up to 70% of the population between 35-55 years of age and is the principal cause of occupational disability. The scientific evidence on the effect of manual therapy on low back pain is conflicting and there are no specific reviews on the Maitland concept of manual therapy. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review is to analyze the effect of the techniques of the Maitland concept of manual therapy in patients with low back pain and/or determine the level of scientific evidence.For this, a search was carried out in the Cinahl, Medline, Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus databases during the months of January and February 2021 and it was updated in August 2021. In the search, 894 records were obtained, of which 15 randomized clinical trials that obtained a minimum of 3 points out of 5 on the Jadad scale were included.The main results in the current scientific literature suggest that there is solid evidence that the manipulations and mobilizations described in the Maitland Concept, applied alone or in combination with other interventions, reduce pain and disability in subjects with low back pain.The effects on musculature are contradictory. Exercise and patient education increase the effect of manual therapy. Future research requires analyzing whether the effects are preserved in the long term and more homogeneous treatment protocols are needed to determine a prescriptive guideline for manual therapy. Level of evidence I; Systematic review.","PeriodicalId":40025,"journal":{"name":"Coluna/ Columna","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coluna/ Columna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1808-185120222102258429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT Low back pain has a prevalence that reaches up to 70% of the population between 35-55 years of age and is the principal cause of occupational disability. The scientific evidence on the effect of manual therapy on low back pain is conflicting and there are no specific reviews on the Maitland concept of manual therapy. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review is to analyze the effect of the techniques of the Maitland concept of manual therapy in patients with low back pain and/or determine the level of scientific evidence.For this, a search was carried out in the Cinahl, Medline, Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus databases during the months of January and February 2021 and it was updated in August 2021. In the search, 894 records were obtained, of which 15 randomized clinical trials that obtained a minimum of 3 points out of 5 on the Jadad scale were included.The main results in the current scientific literature suggest that there is solid evidence that the manipulations and mobilizations described in the Maitland Concept, applied alone or in combination with other interventions, reduce pain and disability in subjects with low back pain.The effects on musculature are contradictory. Exercise and patient education increase the effect of manual therapy. Future research requires analyzing whether the effects are preserved in the long term and more homogeneous treatment protocols are needed to determine a prescriptive guideline for manual therapy. Level of evidence I; Systematic review.
腰痛在35-55岁人群中患病率高达70%,是导致职业残疾的主要原因。关于手工疗法对腰痛的影响的科学证据是相互矛盾的,并且没有关于手工疗法的梅特兰概念的具体评论。因此,本系统综述的目的是分析Maitland概念的手法治疗技术对腰痛患者的影响和/或确定科学证据的水平。为此,我们于2021年1月和2月在Cinahl、Medline、Web of Science、PubMed和Scopus数据库中进行了检索,并于2021年8月进行了更新。在检索中,获得了894份记录,其中包括15项随机临床试验,在Jadad量表上获得至少3分(满分5分)。当前科学文献的主要结果表明,有确凿的证据表明,Maitland概念中描述的手法和动员,单独应用或与其他干预措施相结合,可以减轻腰痛患者的疼痛和残疾。对肌肉组织的影响是相互矛盾的。运动和患者教育可提高手工治疗的效果。未来的研究需要分析效果是否能长期保持,需要更均匀的治疗方案来确定手工治疗的指导性指南。证据等级I;系统的回顾。