SHORT ARTHRODESIS IS AS EFFECTIVE AS LONG ARTHRODESIS FOR THE TREATMENT OF TYPE B THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES

Q4 Medicine Coluna/ Columna Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/s1808-185120222103264651
Guilherme Finger, D. Shuha, T. Cecchini, Tobias Ludwig do Nascimento, Maria Eduarda Conte Gripa, F. Cecchini, Ericson Sfredo, A. Cecchini, A. Falavigna
{"title":"SHORT ARTHRODESIS IS AS EFFECTIVE AS LONG ARTHRODESIS FOR THE TREATMENT OF TYPE B THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES","authors":"Guilherme Finger, D. Shuha, T. Cecchini, Tobias Ludwig do Nascimento, Maria Eduarda Conte Gripa, F. Cecchini, Ericson Sfredo, A. Cecchini, A. Falavigna","doi":"10.1590/s1808-185120222103264651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: Thoracolumbar spine trauma is a world wide health concern that especially affects males of working age, being associated with an elevated morbidity. AO SPINE Type B fractures are unstable and require surgical stabilization. However, the decision between short or long fixation remains controversial. The objective of this study is to analyze the neurological, orthopedic and functional outcomes in patients with Type B spine fractures who have undergone short and long segment posterior arthrodesis. Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed at the Neurosurgery Department of Hospital Cristo Redentor from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2018. Patients with spine fractures classified as AO SPINE Type B in the thoracic or thoracolumbar segments were eligible for the study. The variables analyzed included demographic data, information about the trauma, neurological status, the treatment performed, and the outcome. Results: A total of 31 patients were included in the study. The majority were Caucasian males with a mean age of 42.6(±15.6), and the main cause of the spine trauma was falling from height (N=18; 56.2%). Fifteen patients (48.3%) had subtype B1 fractures and 16 (51.6%) had subtype B2 fractures. Eleven (35.4%) patients were submitted to short arthrodesis and 20 (64.5%) were submitted to long arthrodesis. There was no statistical difference between groups in terms of neurological, orthopedic and functional outcomes. Conclusions: There is no difference in outcomes between short or long constructs for patients with type B single fracture in the thoracic, thoracolumbar and lumbar spine segments. Level of evidence III; Therapeutic Studies – Investigation of treatment results.","PeriodicalId":40025,"journal":{"name":"Coluna/ Columna","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coluna/ Columna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1808-185120222103264651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: Thoracolumbar spine trauma is a world wide health concern that especially affects males of working age, being associated with an elevated morbidity. AO SPINE Type B fractures are unstable and require surgical stabilization. However, the decision between short or long fixation remains controversial. The objective of this study is to analyze the neurological, orthopedic and functional outcomes in patients with Type B spine fractures who have undergone short and long segment posterior arthrodesis. Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed at the Neurosurgery Department of Hospital Cristo Redentor from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2018. Patients with spine fractures classified as AO SPINE Type B in the thoracic or thoracolumbar segments were eligible for the study. The variables analyzed included demographic data, information about the trauma, neurological status, the treatment performed, and the outcome. Results: A total of 31 patients were included in the study. The majority were Caucasian males with a mean age of 42.6(±15.6), and the main cause of the spine trauma was falling from height (N=18; 56.2%). Fifteen patients (48.3%) had subtype B1 fractures and 16 (51.6%) had subtype B2 fractures. Eleven (35.4%) patients were submitted to short arthrodesis and 20 (64.5%) were submitted to long arthrodesis. There was no statistical difference between groups in terms of neurological, orthopedic and functional outcomes. Conclusions: There is no difference in outcomes between short or long constructs for patients with type B single fracture in the thoracic, thoracolumbar and lumbar spine segments. Level of evidence III; Therapeutic Studies – Investigation of treatment results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
短关节融合术与长关节融合术治疗b型胸腰椎骨折同样有效
摘要目的:胸腰椎创伤是一个世界性的健康问题,尤其影响到工作年龄的男性,与发病率升高有关。AO脊柱B型骨折不稳定,需要手术稳定。然而,短期或长期固定的决定仍然存在争议。本研究的目的是分析B型脊柱骨折患者行短段和长段后路关节融合术后的神经学、矫形学和功能预后。方法:2013年1月1日至2018年12月31日,在基督城医院神经外科进行前瞻性队列研究。在胸段或胸腰椎段归类为AO spine B型脊柱骨折的患者符合研究条件。分析的变量包括人口统计数据、创伤信息、神经状态、治疗和结果。结果:共纳入31例患者。以白人男性居多,平均年龄42.6(±15.6)岁,脊柱损伤的主要原因为高空坠落(N=18;56.2%)。B1亚型骨折15例(48.3%),B2亚型骨折16例(51.6%)。11例(35.4%)行短关节融合术,20例(64.5%)行长关节融合术。两组在神经学、骨科和功能预后方面无统计学差异。结论:对于胸、胸腰椎段B型单骨折患者,短假体和长假体的治疗效果无差异。证据等级III;治疗研究-对治疗结果的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Coluna/ Columna
Coluna/ Columna Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS: PROGRESSION OF UNTREATED CASES FUNCTIONALITY OF INDIVIDUALS WITH LOW BACK PAIN: CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY WITH ICF CORE SET ANESTHETIC BLOCK OF THE INTERTRANSVERSE SEPTUM, A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY LUMBAR LORDOSIS VARIATION ACCORDING THE TYPE OF POSITIONER USED IN LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS CLINICAL PHOTOGRAPHIC AND RADIOLOGICAL CORRELATION IN PATIENTS WITH SCOLIOSIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1