QUALITY OF LIFE ANALYSIS ON PATIENTS AFTER ARTHROPLASTY OR LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS

Q4 Medicine Coluna/ Columna Pub Date : 2023-04-17 DOI:10.1590/s1808-185120222201262320
Gustavo Morais da Silva, L. Rodrigues, F. A. Lopes, A. Cesar
{"title":"QUALITY OF LIFE ANALYSIS ON PATIENTS AFTER ARTHROPLASTY OR LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS","authors":"Gustavo Morais da Silva, L. Rodrigues, F. A. Lopes, A. Cesar","doi":"10.1590/s1808-185120222201262320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: To perform a retrospective analysis of patients with degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine undergoing arthrodesis or lumbar arthroplasty in terms of functional capacity and quality of life. Methods: Retrospective observational study analyzing the medical records of patients undergoing arthrodesis or lumbar arthroplasty, followed-up at an outpatient clinic from 2018 to 2020. Patient characteristics were evaluated; the quality of life through the results of the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) and the functional capacity using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in the pre-surgical and post-surgical periods (6 months, 1 and 2 years). The criterion to establish statistical significance was p≤0.05. Results: Sixty-one patients were evaluated. After the surgical interventions, the individuals migrated from the classification of invalid (61.4%-64.6%) to minimal/moderate disability (17.7%-25.6%). There was a decline in ODI scores over time of follow-up (p≤0.001) as well as in SF-36 values (p≤0.001) for all surgical techniques. In this regard, evaluating the difference in means revealed the better performance of lumbar arthroplasty (p≤0.001). Conclusion: The data suggest that lumbar arthroplasty offers greater benefits to patients regarding functional capacity and quality of life. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective, descriptive, observational study.","PeriodicalId":40025,"journal":{"name":"Coluna/ Columna","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coluna/ Columna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1808-185120222201262320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To perform a retrospective analysis of patients with degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine undergoing arthrodesis or lumbar arthroplasty in terms of functional capacity and quality of life. Methods: Retrospective observational study analyzing the medical records of patients undergoing arthrodesis or lumbar arthroplasty, followed-up at an outpatient clinic from 2018 to 2020. Patient characteristics were evaluated; the quality of life through the results of the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) and the functional capacity using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in the pre-surgical and post-surgical periods (6 months, 1 and 2 years). The criterion to establish statistical significance was p≤0.05. Results: Sixty-one patients were evaluated. After the surgical interventions, the individuals migrated from the classification of invalid (61.4%-64.6%) to minimal/moderate disability (17.7%-25.6%). There was a decline in ODI scores over time of follow-up (p≤0.001) as well as in SF-36 values (p≤0.001) for all surgical techniques. In this regard, evaluating the difference in means revealed the better performance of lumbar arthroplasty (p≤0.001). Conclusion: The data suggest that lumbar arthroplasty offers greater benefits to patients regarding functional capacity and quality of life. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective, descriptive, observational study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关节置换术或腰椎关节融合术后患者生活质量分析
【摘要】目的:回顾性分析腰椎退行性椎间盘病变行关节融合术或腰椎关节置换术患者的功能能力和生活质量。方法:回顾性观察性研究,分析2018 - 2020年在门诊接受关节融合术或腰椎关节置换术患者的病历。评估患者特征;在术前和术后(6个月、1年和2年),通过简易36健康调查问卷(SF-36)的结果和使用Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)的功能能力评估患者的生活质量。p≤0.05为具有统计学意义的判定标准。结果:对61例患者进行了评估。手术干预后,个体从无效(61.4%-64.6%)转移到轻度/中度残疾(17.7%-25.6%)。随着随访时间的推移,所有手术技术的ODI评分下降(p≤0.001),SF-36值下降(p≤0.001)。在这方面,评估平均值的差异显示腰椎关节置换术的表现更好(p≤0.001)。结论:数据表明,腰椎关节置换术对患者的功能能力和生活质量有更大的好处。证据等级III;回顾性、描述性、观察性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Coluna/ Columna
Coluna/ Columna Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS: PROGRESSION OF UNTREATED CASES FUNCTIONALITY OF INDIVIDUALS WITH LOW BACK PAIN: CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY WITH ICF CORE SET ANESTHETIC BLOCK OF THE INTERTRANSVERSE SEPTUM, A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY LUMBAR LORDOSIS VARIATION ACCORDING THE TYPE OF POSITIONER USED IN LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS CLINICAL PHOTOGRAPHIC AND RADIOLOGICAL CORRELATION IN PATIENTS WITH SCOLIOSIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1