Efficacy of oral montelukast in comparison of inhaled steroids for mild persistent asthma among children aged 1-5 years: A randomized clinical trial in Sri-Lanka

Jayawardena Pp, G. J, Imalke Kacp
{"title":"Efficacy of oral montelukast in comparison of inhaled steroids for mild persistent asthma among children aged 1-5 years: A randomized clinical trial in Sri-Lanka","authors":"Jayawardena Pp, G. J, Imalke Kacp","doi":"10.15761/pccm.1000160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In Sri Lanka, the incidence of asthma has been reported as 2.6% in children. Increased cost and poor adherence of Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICSs) put forward the advancement of leukotriene antagonists like montelukast. However, the efficacy of montelukast has not been studied fully in children of Sri Lanka. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of montelukast and ICS in children aged 1 to 5 years with mild persistent asthma. Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 2011 May 2013. Children age 1-5 years having cough and wheeze were included. The endpoint of the study was to determine the effectiveness of montelukast in the improvement of asthma symptoms measured by asthma score in comparison to ICS. Participants were divided into 2 groups where group 1 was designated for ICS and group 2 for montelukast. Data was recorded daily in the symptom diary, while coded and analyzed on SPSS. This trial is registered with Sri Lanka Clinical Trial Registry under number: SLCTR/2011/006. Results: The study population of 81 children of which 64.2% were male, mean age was 40.12 ± 13.50 months and weight of 17.70 ± 21.65 Kg. Significant improvement in the mean asthma score was observed in both groups. As compared to ICS, nasal congestion was significantly reduced in montelukast group with mean score of 281.71 ± 27.05 (p = 0.034) and improvement in physical activities were equally achieved. Conclusion: Montelukast is equally effective as inhaled corticosteroids in prevention of mild persistent asthma among 1-5 years and additional significant benefit in controlling rhinitis. *Correspondence to: Jayawardena PP, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, Karapitiya, Galle, Sri Lanka, Tel: +94 777901662; Fax: +94 91 2222314; E-mail: pushpikaja@yahoo.com.au","PeriodicalId":91958,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary and critical care medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/pccm.1000160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: In Sri Lanka, the incidence of asthma has been reported as 2.6% in children. Increased cost and poor adherence of Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICSs) put forward the advancement of leukotriene antagonists like montelukast. However, the efficacy of montelukast has not been studied fully in children of Sri Lanka. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of montelukast and ICS in children aged 1 to 5 years with mild persistent asthma. Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 2011 May 2013. Children age 1-5 years having cough and wheeze were included. The endpoint of the study was to determine the effectiveness of montelukast in the improvement of asthma symptoms measured by asthma score in comparison to ICS. Participants were divided into 2 groups where group 1 was designated for ICS and group 2 for montelukast. Data was recorded daily in the symptom diary, while coded and analyzed on SPSS. This trial is registered with Sri Lanka Clinical Trial Registry under number: SLCTR/2011/006. Results: The study population of 81 children of which 64.2% were male, mean age was 40.12 ± 13.50 months and weight of 17.70 ± 21.65 Kg. Significant improvement in the mean asthma score was observed in both groups. As compared to ICS, nasal congestion was significantly reduced in montelukast group with mean score of 281.71 ± 27.05 (p = 0.034) and improvement in physical activities were equally achieved. Conclusion: Montelukast is equally effective as inhaled corticosteroids in prevention of mild persistent asthma among 1-5 years and additional significant benefit in controlling rhinitis. *Correspondence to: Jayawardena PP, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, Karapitiya, Galle, Sri Lanka, Tel: +94 777901662; Fax: +94 91 2222314; E-mail: pushpikaja@yahoo.com.au
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口服孟鲁司特与吸入类固醇治疗1-5岁儿童轻度持续性哮喘的疗效比较:斯里兰卡的一项随机临床试验
背景:在斯里兰卡,据报道儿童哮喘发病率为2.6%。吸入皮质类固醇(ICSs)的成本增加和依从性差促使孟鲁司特等白三烯拮抗剂的发展。然而,孟鲁司特在斯里兰卡儿童中的疗效尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是比较孟鲁司特和ICS对1 - 5岁轻度持续性哮喘患儿的疗效。方法:该随机临床试验于2011年12月至2013年5月进行。包括1-5岁有咳嗽和喘息症状的儿童。该研究的目的是确定孟鲁司特与ICS相比在哮喘症状改善方面的有效性。参与者分为2组,其中1组用于ICS, 2组用于孟鲁司特。数据每天记录在症状日记中,并在SPSS上进行编码和分析。该试验已在斯里兰卡临床试验注册中心注册,编号:SLCTR/2011/006。结果:81例患儿中男性占64.2%,平均年龄40.12±13.50月龄,体重17.70±21.65 Kg。两组患者的平均哮喘评分均有显著改善。与ICS组相比,孟鲁司特组鼻塞明显减轻,平均评分为281.71±27.05 (p = 0.034),运动能力也得到改善。结论:孟鲁司特在预防1-5年轻度持续性哮喘方面与吸入皮质类固醇同样有效,在控制鼻炎方面也有显著的益处。*通讯:斯里兰卡加勒卡拉皮提亚鲁胡纳大学医学院儿科系Jayawardena PP,电话:+94 777901662;传真:+94 91 2222314;电子邮件:pushpikaja@yahoo.com.au
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Primary Care Providers’ Knowledge and Attitudes towards Organ Donation and Deemed Consent in Nova Scotia, Canada Tailored Intervention at Home for Those with COPD & Comorbidity by Pharmacists & Physicians (TICCPCP): Process Evaluation The Experience of Primary Care for Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): An IPA Study The Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Frailty in Middle-Aged People with COPD Chronic cough diagnosis and treatment among family physicians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1