Health seeking behaviour and access to care for mobile and migrant populations in Cambodia

S. Kheang, E. Collins, A. Preston, Y. An, P. Ir, Hok Phalla, Dysoley Lek, R. Huy, Sovannaroath Siv, H. Almossawi, N. Kak
{"title":"Health seeking behaviour and access to care for mobile and migrant populations in Cambodia","authors":"S. Kheang, E. Collins, A. Preston, Y. An, P. Ir, Hok Phalla, Dysoley Lek, R. Huy, Sovannaroath Siv, H. Almossawi, N. Kak","doi":"10.15761/pmch.1000126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Malaria elimination campaigns are making huge strides in Cambodia with a target of malaria elimination by 2025. However, pockets of transmission remain. Predominately in border forested areas in Western Cambodia, the populations residing here are often part of mobile and migrant populations (MMPs). Moreover, the rise of drug resistance makes the goal of malaria elimination ever more urgent. Materials and methods: The Cambodia Mobile and Migrant Population Survey was a cross-sectional survey aimed to gain further insight into MMPs to inform malaria control and elimination interventions. A purposive sampling technique was used to identify study participants, given the difficulty of identifying and accessing MMPs. The survey was conducted across ten malaria endemic health districts in 2017. Separation of MMPs into four main occupational subgroups; construction workers, seasonal workers, forest goers and security personnel, was used for analysis. Results: The results from this study confirm MMPs are a key group at higher risk of malaria due to their associated risky behaviours. MMPs have a significantly different risk of suffering from fever between subgroups with forest goers and seasonal workers far more likely to report suffering from fever within the last three months. However, the willingness to seek healthcare because of fever was remarkably good, and similar among subgroups. A concerning finding was the low numbers of suspected malaria cases being diagnosed with parasitological blood testing and just under half of MMPs were not aware that malaria should be confirmed by parasitological blood test. Conclusion: MMPs are at an elevated risk of malaria compared to the general population, and this risk varies within MMPs depending on the subgroup. Although health seeking behaviour was reportedly good for all MMP subgroups to public health facilities and volunteers, barriers in access to care were significantly different. This highlights that MMPs can no longer be treated as a homogenous group when targeted by malaria interventions. *Correspondence to: Soy Ty Kheang, University Research Co., LLC, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, Tel: +855 17 988 388; E-mail: ksoyty@urc-chs.com Received: June 10, 2019; Accepted: June 24, 2019; Published: June 27, 2019 Background The past decade has seen impressive improvements in malaria control, presenting the possibility for renewed attempts for elimination [1]. Cambodia made huge strides in reducing malaria, and over the last decade, cases caused by Plasmodium falciparum have reduced by 81% [2]. As a result, Cambodia aims to completely eliminate malaria by 2025 [3]. However, the emergence and spread of P. falciparum artemisinin drug resistance poses major challenges to achieving these goals as treatment failure becomes increasingly common [4,5]. Resistance was first reported on the Thai-Cambodia border in 2008 and has since spread to several more countries in the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS) causing increasing concern for global malaria mortality rates [6,7]. Features of the current social landscape in Cambodia, including having a highly mobile population with reduced access to public healthcare, and the high utilisation of unregulated private healthcare, may further exacerbate the existing problems of resistance [8]. In the setting of elimination, the remaining cases often cluster in particular groups, generally those who are most vulnerable and marginalised, who engage in high risk behaviours [9,10]. It is these foci which therefore need to be understood best to achieve elimination. In Cambodia, malaria transmission tends to be concentrated in Mobile and Migrant Populations (MMPs). MMPs have been found to be three times more likely to have clinical malaria episodes compared to the general population, and in the Thailand-Cambodia border regions, areas with greater numbers of migrants also had correspondingly higher rates of malaria [11,12]. Due to the high mobility of MMPs, they often do not have access to routine surveillance or health promotion initiatives and they are more likely to seek more accessible unlicensed private healthcare, as was found to be the case in MMPs in Myanmar [13-16]. Thus the characteristics of this population are suggested to be one of the main drivers for malaria transmission and spread of drug resistance [5,16,17]. It is feared that this could lead to the reintroduction of malaria into previously malaria-free zones, especially as cases are often reported when migrants have returned to their home residence for treatment [17,18]. Migration poses significant challenges to the elimination of malaria and this will not be effectively dealt with until MMPs are better understood. Kheang ST (2019) Health seeking behaviour and access to care for mobile and migrant populations in Cambodia Volume 2: 2-7 Prev Med Commun Health , 2019 doi: 10.15761/PMCH.1000126 In Cambodia, the generally accepted definition of MMPs are that mobile individuals have been residing in the area for less than six months and migrant individuals have been there for more than six months, but less than a year [17,19]. MMPs are at greater risk of malaria than the general population for several key reasons; one of the main reasons is that their work is related to the forest, putting them at high risk of coming into contact with malaria vectors, and this forestrelated transmission is the most common form of transmission in Cambodia [15,17,20]. Multiple studies have shown that significantly higher parasite rates have been found in migrants and villagers living near forest areas compared to the general population [21,22]. Other key reasons include the health seeking behaviour of MMPs and the barriers they face when accessing care. A study focusing on migrants working on the Thailand-Cambodia border found that between 15-27% (depending on the migrant subgroup) would not seek treatment for suspected malaria [23]. If MMPs do seek healthcare, they are likely to seek private healthcare providers, potentially increasing their exposure to poor quality drugs and treatment regimens [14,20]. The most important determinants for MMPs to seek care were the proximity of services and the cost, including cost of treatment and also transport to get there [8,23]. Furthermore, they often have poor access to healthcare as they work in remote areas, making them more likely to have late diagnosis and they are often difficult to follow up to ensure treatment compliance and clearance of parasites [5,18]. Key factors influencing MMP access to healthcare in the GMS included geographical constraints, barriers to do with culture or language, financial constraints and potential eligibility or legal restrictions for migrant health [5,24]. Although the general characteristics of MMPs are understood, interventions often target them as a homogenous group; however, without understanding the unique behaviours of each subgroup within MMPs, they will never be effectively targeted. Health seeking behaviour and barriers to healthcare access were identified as key research priorities to develop malaria control interventions [4,18]. Therefore, the aim of this study is to create a detailed picture of the health seeking behaviour of the key MMP subgroups at risk of malaria in Cambodia. Materials and methods","PeriodicalId":74491,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine and community health","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine and community health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/pmch.1000126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Malaria elimination campaigns are making huge strides in Cambodia with a target of malaria elimination by 2025. However, pockets of transmission remain. Predominately in border forested areas in Western Cambodia, the populations residing here are often part of mobile and migrant populations (MMPs). Moreover, the rise of drug resistance makes the goal of malaria elimination ever more urgent. Materials and methods: The Cambodia Mobile and Migrant Population Survey was a cross-sectional survey aimed to gain further insight into MMPs to inform malaria control and elimination interventions. A purposive sampling technique was used to identify study participants, given the difficulty of identifying and accessing MMPs. The survey was conducted across ten malaria endemic health districts in 2017. Separation of MMPs into four main occupational subgroups; construction workers, seasonal workers, forest goers and security personnel, was used for analysis. Results: The results from this study confirm MMPs are a key group at higher risk of malaria due to their associated risky behaviours. MMPs have a significantly different risk of suffering from fever between subgroups with forest goers and seasonal workers far more likely to report suffering from fever within the last three months. However, the willingness to seek healthcare because of fever was remarkably good, and similar among subgroups. A concerning finding was the low numbers of suspected malaria cases being diagnosed with parasitological blood testing and just under half of MMPs were not aware that malaria should be confirmed by parasitological blood test. Conclusion: MMPs are at an elevated risk of malaria compared to the general population, and this risk varies within MMPs depending on the subgroup. Although health seeking behaviour was reportedly good for all MMP subgroups to public health facilities and volunteers, barriers in access to care were significantly different. This highlights that MMPs can no longer be treated as a homogenous group when targeted by malaria interventions. *Correspondence to: Soy Ty Kheang, University Research Co., LLC, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, Tel: +855 17 988 388; E-mail: ksoyty@urc-chs.com Received: June 10, 2019; Accepted: June 24, 2019; Published: June 27, 2019 Background The past decade has seen impressive improvements in malaria control, presenting the possibility for renewed attempts for elimination [1]. Cambodia made huge strides in reducing malaria, and over the last decade, cases caused by Plasmodium falciparum have reduced by 81% [2]. As a result, Cambodia aims to completely eliminate malaria by 2025 [3]. However, the emergence and spread of P. falciparum artemisinin drug resistance poses major challenges to achieving these goals as treatment failure becomes increasingly common [4,5]. Resistance was first reported on the Thai-Cambodia border in 2008 and has since spread to several more countries in the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS) causing increasing concern for global malaria mortality rates [6,7]. Features of the current social landscape in Cambodia, including having a highly mobile population with reduced access to public healthcare, and the high utilisation of unregulated private healthcare, may further exacerbate the existing problems of resistance [8]. In the setting of elimination, the remaining cases often cluster in particular groups, generally those who are most vulnerable and marginalised, who engage in high risk behaviours [9,10]. It is these foci which therefore need to be understood best to achieve elimination. In Cambodia, malaria transmission tends to be concentrated in Mobile and Migrant Populations (MMPs). MMPs have been found to be three times more likely to have clinical malaria episodes compared to the general population, and in the Thailand-Cambodia border regions, areas with greater numbers of migrants also had correspondingly higher rates of malaria [11,12]. Due to the high mobility of MMPs, they often do not have access to routine surveillance or health promotion initiatives and they are more likely to seek more accessible unlicensed private healthcare, as was found to be the case in MMPs in Myanmar [13-16]. Thus the characteristics of this population are suggested to be one of the main drivers for malaria transmission and spread of drug resistance [5,16,17]. It is feared that this could lead to the reintroduction of malaria into previously malaria-free zones, especially as cases are often reported when migrants have returned to their home residence for treatment [17,18]. Migration poses significant challenges to the elimination of malaria and this will not be effectively dealt with until MMPs are better understood. Kheang ST (2019) Health seeking behaviour and access to care for mobile and migrant populations in Cambodia Volume 2: 2-7 Prev Med Commun Health , 2019 doi: 10.15761/PMCH.1000126 In Cambodia, the generally accepted definition of MMPs are that mobile individuals have been residing in the area for less than six months and migrant individuals have been there for more than six months, but less than a year [17,19]. MMPs are at greater risk of malaria than the general population for several key reasons; one of the main reasons is that their work is related to the forest, putting them at high risk of coming into contact with malaria vectors, and this forestrelated transmission is the most common form of transmission in Cambodia [15,17,20]. Multiple studies have shown that significantly higher parasite rates have been found in migrants and villagers living near forest areas compared to the general population [21,22]. Other key reasons include the health seeking behaviour of MMPs and the barriers they face when accessing care. A study focusing on migrants working on the Thailand-Cambodia border found that between 15-27% (depending on the migrant subgroup) would not seek treatment for suspected malaria [23]. If MMPs do seek healthcare, they are likely to seek private healthcare providers, potentially increasing their exposure to poor quality drugs and treatment regimens [14,20]. The most important determinants for MMPs to seek care were the proximity of services and the cost, including cost of treatment and also transport to get there [8,23]. Furthermore, they often have poor access to healthcare as they work in remote areas, making them more likely to have late diagnosis and they are often difficult to follow up to ensure treatment compliance and clearance of parasites [5,18]. Key factors influencing MMP access to healthcare in the GMS included geographical constraints, barriers to do with culture or language, financial constraints and potential eligibility or legal restrictions for migrant health [5,24]. Although the general characteristics of MMPs are understood, interventions often target them as a homogenous group; however, without understanding the unique behaviours of each subgroup within MMPs, they will never be effectively targeted. Health seeking behaviour and barriers to healthcare access were identified as key research priorities to develop malaria control interventions [4,18]. Therefore, the aim of this study is to create a detailed picture of the health seeking behaviour of the key MMP subgroups at risk of malaria in Cambodia. Materials and methods
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
柬埔寨流动人口和移徙人口的求医行为和获得保健的机会
背景:柬埔寨的消除疟疾运动取得了巨大进展,目标是到2025年消除疟疾。然而,小范围传播仍然存在。主要在柬埔寨西部的边境森林地区,居住在这里的人口通常是流动人口和移民人口(MMPs)的一部分。此外,耐药性的上升使得消除疟疾的目标更加紧迫。材料和方法:柬埔寨流动和移民人口调查是一项横断面调查,旨在进一步了解MMPs,为疟疾控制和消除干预措施提供信息。考虑到识别和获取MMPs的困难,采用了有目的的抽样技术来识别研究参与者。该调查于2017年在十个疟疾流行卫生区进行。MMPs分为四个主要职业亚组;建筑工人、季节性工人、森林游客和保安人员被用于分析。结果:本研究的结果证实,由于其相关的危险行为,mmp是疟疾风险较高的关键群体。MMPs在不同亚群之间发烧的风险有显著差异,森林游客和季节性工人在过去三个月内报告发烧的可能性要大得多。然而,因发烧而寻求医疗保健的意愿非常好,并且在亚组之间相似。一个令人关切的发现是,通过寄生虫血液检测诊断出疑似疟疾病例的人数很少,略低于一半的MMPs不知道应该通过寄生虫血液检测确诊疟疾。结论:与一般人群相比,MMPs患疟疾的风险较高,并且这种风险在MMPs内部因亚组而异。尽管据报告,在公共卫生设施和志愿者中,所有MMP亚组的求医行为都是有益的,但在获得保健方面的障碍有很大不同。这突出表明,在疟疾干预措施的目标人群中,不能再将中西医结合患者视为一个同质群体。*通讯:Soy Ty Kheang, University Research Co, LLC,金边,柬埔寨,电话:+855 17 988 388;邮箱:ksoyty@urc-chs.com收稿日期:2019年6月10日;录用日期:2019年6月24日;过去十年,在疟疾控制方面取得了令人印象深刻的进展,这为重新尝试消除疟疾提供了可能。柬埔寨在减少疟疾方面取得了巨大进展,在过去十年中,由恶性疟原虫引起的病例减少了81%。因此,柬埔寨的目标是到2025年彻底消灭疟疾。然而,恶性疟原虫青蒿素耐药性的出现和传播对实现这些目标构成了重大挑战,因为治疗失败变得越来越普遍[4,5]。2008年首次在泰国-柬埔寨边境报告了耐药性,此后已蔓延到大湄公河次区域(GMS)的其他几个国家,引起对全球疟疾死亡率的日益关注[6,7]。柬埔寨当前社会格局的特点,包括人口流动性高,获得公共医疗服务的机会减少,以及不受管制的私人医疗服务使用率高,可能进一步加剧现有的耐药性问题。在消除情况下,剩余病例往往集中在特定群体中,通常是那些最脆弱和被边缘化的人,他们从事高风险行为[9,10]。因此,要实现消除,最需要了解的就是这些疫源地。在柬埔寨,疟疾传播往往集中在流动人口和移徙人口中。研究发现,与一般人群相比,MMPs发生临床疟疾发作的可能性要高出三倍,而且在泰国-柬埔寨边境地区,移民人数较多的地区也相应地具有较高的疟疾发病率[11,12]。由于MMPs的高流动性,他们往往无法获得常规监测或健康促进举措,他们更有可能寻求更容易获得的无证私人医疗保健,正如在缅甸MMPs中发现的情况[13-16]。因此,这一人群的特征被认为是疟疾传播和耐药性传播的主要驱动因素之一[5,16,17]。令人担心的是,这可能导致疟疾重新传入以前无疟疾的地区,特别是当移徙者返回其住所接受治疗时经常报告病例[17,18]。移徙对消除疟疾构成重大挑战,在更好地了解MMPs之前,这将无法得到有效处理。Kheang ST(2019)柬埔寨流动人口和移民人口的求医行为和获得保健的机会第2卷:2-7预防医疗公共卫生,2019 doi: 10.15761/PMCH。 背景:柬埔寨的消除疟疾运动取得了巨大进展,目标是到2025年消除疟疾。然而,小范围传播仍然存在。主要在柬埔寨西部的边境森林地区,居住在这里的人口通常是流动人口和移民人口(MMPs)的一部分。此外,耐药性的上升使得消除疟疾的目标更加紧迫。材料和方法:柬埔寨流动和移民人口调查是一项横断面调查,旨在进一步了解MMPs,为疟疾控制和消除干预措施提供信息。考虑到识别和获取MMPs的困难,采用了有目的的抽样技术来识别研究参与者。该调查于2017年在十个疟疾流行卫生区进行。MMPs分为四个主要职业亚组;建筑工人、季节性工人、森林游客和保安人员被用于分析。结果:本研究的结果证实,由于其相关的危险行为,mmp是疟疾风险较高的关键群体。MMPs在不同亚群之间发烧的风险有显著差异,森林游客和季节性工人在过去三个月内报告发烧的可能性要大得多。然而,因发烧而寻求医疗保健的意愿非常好,并且在亚组之间相似。一个令人关切的发现是,通过寄生虫血液检测诊断出疑似疟疾病例的人数很少,略低于一半的MMPs不知道应该通过寄生虫血液检测确诊疟疾。结论:与一般人群相比,MMPs患疟疾的风险较高,并且这种风险在MMPs内部因亚组而异。尽管据报告,在公共卫生设施和志愿者中,所有MMP亚组的求医行为都是有益的,但在获得保健方面的障碍有很大不同。这突出表明,在疟疾干预措施的目标人群中,不能再将中西医结合患者视为一个同质群体。*通讯:Soy Ty Kheang, University Research Co, LLC,金边,柬埔寨,电话:+855 17 988 388;邮箱:ksoyty@urc-chs.com收稿日期:2019年6月10日;录用日期:2019年6月24日;过去十年,在疟疾控制方面取得了令人印象深刻的进展,这为重新尝试消除疟疾提供了可能。柬埔寨在减少疟疾方面取得了巨大进展,在过去十年中,由恶性疟原虫引起的病例减少了81%。因此,柬埔寨的目标是到2025年彻底消灭疟疾。然而,恶性疟原虫青蒿素耐药性的出现和传播对实现这些目标构成了重大挑战,因为治疗失败变得越来越普遍[4,5]。2008年首次在泰国-柬埔寨边境报告了耐药性,此后已蔓延到大湄公河次区域(GMS)的其他几个国家,引起对全球疟疾死亡率的日益关注[6,7]。柬埔寨当前社会格局的特点,包括人口流动性高,获得公共医疗服务的机会减少,以及不受管制的私人医疗服务使用率高,可能进一步加剧现有的耐药性问题。在消除情况下,剩余病例往往集中在特定群体中,通常是那些最脆弱和被边缘化的人,他们从事高风险行为[9,10]。因此,要实现消除,最需要了解的就是这些疫源地。在柬埔寨,疟疾传播往往集中在流动人口和移徙人口中。研究发现,与一般人群相比,MMPs发生临床疟疾发作的可能性要高出三倍,而且在泰国-柬埔寨边境地区,移民人数较多的地区也相应地具有较高的疟疾发病率[11,12]。由于MMPs的高流动性,他们往往无法获得常规监测或健康促进举措,他们更有可能寻求更容易获得的无证私人医疗保健,正如在缅甸MMPs中发现的情况[13-16]。因此,这一人群的特征被认为是疟疾传播和耐药性传播的主要驱动因素之一[5,16,17]。令人担心的是,这可能导致疟疾重新传入以前无疟疾的地区,特别是当移徙者返回其住所接受治疗时经常报告病例[17,18]。移徙对消除疟疾构成重大挑战,在更好地了解MMPs之前,这将无法得到有效处理。Kheang ST(2019)柬埔寨流动人口和移民人口的求医行为和获得保健的机会第2卷:2-7预防医疗公共卫生,2019 doi: 10.15761/PMCH。 1000126在柬埔寨,普遍接受的MMPs定义是流动个人在该地区居住少于6个月,移民个人在该地区居住超过6个月,但不到一年[17,19]。由于几个关键原因,产妇比一般人群面临更大的疟疾风险;其中一个主要原因是他们的工作与森林有关,这使他们面临接触疟疾病媒的高风险,而这种与森林有关的传播是柬埔寨最常见的传播形式[15,17,20]。多项研究表明,与一般人群相比,移民和居住在森林地区附近的村民的寄生虫率明显更高[21,22]。其他主要原因包括mmmp的求医行为以及他们在获得医疗服务时面临的障碍。一项针对在泰国-柬埔寨边境工作的移民的研究发现,15-27%(取决于移民亚群)的人不会因疑似疟疾而寻求治疗。如果MMPs确实寻求医疗保健,他们可能会寻求私人医疗保健提供者,这可能会增加他们接触劣质药物和治疗方案的机会[14,20]。MMPs寻求医疗服务的最重要决定因素是服务的邻近性和成本,包括治疗成本和到达那里的交通成本[8,23]。此外,由于她们在偏远地区工作,她们往往难以获得医疗保健,这使她们更有可能得到较晚的诊断,而且她们往往难以随访,以确保治疗依从性和清除寄生虫[5,18]。影响GMS中MMP获得医疗保健的关键因素包括地理限制、文化或语言障碍、财务限制以及移民健康的潜在资格或法律限制[5,24]。虽然了解mmmp的一般特征,但干预措施往往将其作为一个同质群体;然而,如果不了解MMPs中每个子群体的独特行为,它们将永远无法有效地定位。求医行为和获得医疗保健的障碍被确定为制定疟疾控制干预措施的关键研究重点[4,18]。因此,本研究的目的是详细描述柬埔寨面临疟疾风险的主要MMP亚群体的寻求健康行为。材料与方法 1000126在柬埔寨,普遍接受的MMPs定义是流动个人在该地区居住少于6个月,移民个人在该地区居住超过6个月,但不到一年[17,19]。由于几个关键原因,产妇比一般人群面临更大的疟疾风险;其中一个主要原因是他们的工作与森林有关,这使他们面临接触疟疾病媒的高风险,而这种与森林有关的传播是柬埔寨最常见的传播形式[15,17,20]。多项研究表明,与一般人群相比,移民和居住在森林地区附近的村民的寄生虫率明显更高[21,22]。其他主要原因包括mmmp的求医行为以及他们在获得医疗服务时面临的障碍。一项针对在泰国-柬埔寨边境工作的移民的研究发现,15-27%(取决于移民亚群)的人不会因疑似疟疾而寻求治疗。如果MMPs确实寻求医疗保健,他们可能会寻求私人医疗保健提供者,这可能会增加他们接触劣质药物和治疗方案的机会[14,20]。MMPs寻求医疗服务的最重要决定因素是服务的邻近性和成本,包括治疗成本和到达那里的交通成本[8,23]。此外,由于她们在偏远地区工作,她们往往难以获得医疗保健,这使她们更有可能得到较晚的诊断,而且她们往往难以随访,以确保治疗依从性和清除寄生虫[5,18]。影响GMS中MMP获得医疗保健的关键因素包括地理限制、文化或语言障碍、财务限制以及移民健康的潜在资格或法律限制[5,24]。虽然了解mmmp的一般特征,但干预措施往往将其作为一个同质群体;然而,如果不了解MMPs中每个子群体的独特行为,它们将永远无法有效地定位。求医行为和获得医疗保健的障碍被确定为制定疟疾控制干预措施的关键研究重点[4,18]。因此,本研究的目的是详细描述柬埔寨面临疟疾风险的主要MMP亚群体的寻求健康行为。材料与方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patterns of Mammography Screening in Women with Breast Cancer in a Kansas Community. Maternal mortality in Nigeria: A consideration of infection control factor Assault mortality in United States women of childbearing age Primary and secondary prevention of cervical cancer in Indian women using a public private participation approach: results of a pilot program Physical exercise as a potential strategy to mitigate the effects of Covid-19 in sleep quality: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1