“On Deleuze and Guattari’s Italian Wedding Fake Book : Pynchon, Improvisation, Social Organisation, and Assemblage”

Q2 Arts and Humanities Orbit (Cambridge) Pub Date : 2016-07-18 DOI:10.16995/ORBIT.192
Jeeshan Gazi
{"title":"“On Deleuze and Guattari’s Italian Wedding Fake Book : Pynchon, Improvisation, Social Organisation, and Assemblage”","authors":"Jeeshan Gazi","doi":"10.16995/ORBIT.192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines Pynchon’s literary invention of Deleuze and Guattari’s Italian Wedding Fake Book. Featured in his novel Vineland (1990), previous scholarship has either dismissed the reference as a throwaway joke or argued that Pynchon’s invocation of the philosophers is intended to point us towards the author’s engagement with Anti-Oedipus (1972). Following Charles Hollander’s argument that Pynchon’s jokes indicate important themes in his texts, this article looks beyond the reference to Deleuze and Guattari and to the author’s alignment of these philosophers with a “fake book”. A fake book is a book of basic chords, lyrics, and/or melody lines, which allows those who can read sheet music to improvise, or “fake”, the performance of compositions. Given that it is Deleuze and Guattari’s second collaboration of A Thousand Plateaus (1980) that addresses musicality in various guises, I focus on how Pynchon engages with the concepts of this latter text in terms of improvisation, social organisation, and assemblage. This engagement, I suggest, is less about influence that it is about identification. This is to say that Pynchon has long shared the philosophical outlook of Deleuze and Guattari, as demonstrated with reference to his short story “Entropy” (1960).","PeriodicalId":37450,"journal":{"name":"Orbit (Cambridge)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orbit (Cambridge)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/ORBIT.192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article examines Pynchon’s literary invention of Deleuze and Guattari’s Italian Wedding Fake Book. Featured in his novel Vineland (1990), previous scholarship has either dismissed the reference as a throwaway joke or argued that Pynchon’s invocation of the philosophers is intended to point us towards the author’s engagement with Anti-Oedipus (1972). Following Charles Hollander’s argument that Pynchon’s jokes indicate important themes in his texts, this article looks beyond the reference to Deleuze and Guattari and to the author’s alignment of these philosophers with a “fake book”. A fake book is a book of basic chords, lyrics, and/or melody lines, which allows those who can read sheet music to improvise, or “fake”, the performance of compositions. Given that it is Deleuze and Guattari’s second collaboration of A Thousand Plateaus (1980) that addresses musicality in various guises, I focus on how Pynchon engages with the concepts of this latter text in terms of improvisation, social organisation, and assemblage. This engagement, I suggest, is less about influence that it is about identification. This is to say that Pynchon has long shared the philosophical outlook of Deleuze and Guattari, as demonstrated with reference to his short story “Entropy” (1960).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“德勒兹与瓜塔里的意大利婚礼假书:品钦、即兴、社会组织与集合”
本文考察了品钦对德勒兹的文学虚构和瓜塔利的《意大利婚礼假书》。在他的小说《葡萄园》(1990)中,先前的学者要么将这一引用视为一个随意的笑话,要么认为品钦对哲学家的引用是为了向我们指出作者与《反俄狄浦斯》(1972)的关系。查尔斯·霍兰德(Charles Hollander)认为品钦的笑话在他的文本中表明了重要的主题,这篇文章超越了对德勒兹和瓜塔里的参考,以及作者将这些哲学家与“假书”联系在一起的观点。fake book是一本包含基本和弦、歌词和/或旋律线的书,它允许那些能看懂乐谱的人即兴创作或“伪造”作品的表演。鉴于这是德勒兹和瓜塔里在《千高原》(A Thousand plateau, 1980)中的第二次合作,探讨了各种形式的音乐性,我将重点放在品钦如何在即兴创作、社会组织和集合方面与后一篇文章的概念相结合。我认为,这种接触与其说是为了影响,不如说是为了认同。这就是说,品钦的哲学观长期以来与德勒兹和瓜塔里有着共同的观点,他的短篇小说《熵》(1960)就证明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orbit (Cambridge)
Orbit (Cambridge) Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Orbit: Writing Around Pynchon is a journal that publishes high quality, rigorously reviewed and innovative scholarly material on the works of Thomas Pynchon, related authors and adjacent fields in 20th- and 21st-century literature. We publish special and general issues in a rolling format, which brings together a traditional journal article style with the latest publishing technology to ensure faster, yet prestigious, publication for authors.
期刊最新文献
The Flight of the Junky: Existential Posthumanism and Immanent Life in Early Burroughs Forget-me-not: Giving Voice to Memory in Mark Z. Danielewski's "The Familiar" and Elsa Morante's "La Storia" Introduction: Becoming Familiar with The Familiar, or, The Imaginary Novel and the Imagination Into the Catsum. Mark Z. Danielewski's Arithmopoetics ‘Questionable + Intelligence’: Inter + Legere
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1