Disaster Management, Sustainability, and Globalization: An Integrative Planetary Approach

R. Rajan
{"title":"Disaster Management, Sustainability, and Globalization: An Integrative Planetary Approach","authors":"R. Rajan","doi":"10.18848/2324-755x/cgp/v16i02/1-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article probes into the reasons why the discipline of \"disaster management\" failed to anticipate and prepare for the organizational and social consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in spite of frequent warnings of an impending pandemic by epidemiologists. The article argues that the severity of this failure can only be remedied by breaking out of the discipline's insularity and opening it up to different intellectual crosscurrents from across the entire spectrum of knowledge. It begins by locating the idea of \"disaster\" within a broader awareness of the advent of the Anthropocene age and what this implies for the future of the planet. It then reviews some attempts to incorporate this awareness in the concept of \"sustainability\" within established disciplines such as economics and discusses the limitations of this approach. The article then turns to \"globalization\" and argues that this concept must be significantly enlarged to include various concurrent transformations and their relationship to sustainability. Humanity's collective failure to act decisively on the crucial issue of global warming is then diagnosed as not just a failure of institutions but as stemming from the inadequacy of the concepts that underlie their functioning. After critiquing some of these concepts, the article proposes an alternative approach that would be more appropriate to deal with the question of sustainability and uses the example of the COVID-19 pandemic to illustrate this point. An alternative model of governance is also outlined. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of International Journal of Interdisciplinary Global Studies is the property of Common Ground Research Networks and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)","PeriodicalId":38258,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Interdisciplinary Global Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Interdisciplinary Global Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/2324-755x/cgp/v16i02/1-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article probes into the reasons why the discipline of "disaster management" failed to anticipate and prepare for the organizational and social consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in spite of frequent warnings of an impending pandemic by epidemiologists. The article argues that the severity of this failure can only be remedied by breaking out of the discipline's insularity and opening it up to different intellectual crosscurrents from across the entire spectrum of knowledge. It begins by locating the idea of "disaster" within a broader awareness of the advent of the Anthropocene age and what this implies for the future of the planet. It then reviews some attempts to incorporate this awareness in the concept of "sustainability" within established disciplines such as economics and discusses the limitations of this approach. The article then turns to "globalization" and argues that this concept must be significantly enlarged to include various concurrent transformations and their relationship to sustainability. Humanity's collective failure to act decisively on the crucial issue of global warming is then diagnosed as not just a failure of institutions but as stemming from the inadequacy of the concepts that underlie their functioning. After critiquing some of these concepts, the article proposes an alternative approach that would be more appropriate to deal with the question of sustainability and uses the example of the COVID-19 pandemic to illustrate this point. An alternative model of governance is also outlined. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of International Journal of Interdisciplinary Global Studies is the property of Common Ground Research Networks and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灾害管理、可持续性和全球化:一个综合的全球方法
本文探讨了“灾害管理”学科未能预测和准备新冠肺炎大流行的组织和社会后果的原因,尽管流行病学家经常警告即将到来的大流行。这篇文章认为,这种失败的严重性只能通过打破学科的孤立性,并向来自整个知识范围的不同知识逆流开放来补救。它首先将“灾难”的概念定位在人类世时代到来的更广泛的意识中,以及这对地球的未来意味着什么。然后,它回顾了将这种意识纳入诸如经济学等既定学科的“可持续性”概念的一些尝试,并讨论了这种方法的局限性。然后文章转向“全球化”,并认为这一概念必须显著扩大,以包括各种并发的转变及其与可持续性的关系。人类未能在全球变暖这一关键问题上采取果断行动,这不仅被诊断为制度的失败,而且被诊断为源于作为其运作基础的概念的不足。在对其中一些概念进行了批判之后,本文提出了一种更适合处理可持续性问题的替代方法,并以2019冠状病毒病大流行为例说明了这一点。本文还概述了另一种治理模式。国际跨学科全球研究杂志版权归Common Ground Research Networks所有,未经版权所有者明确书面许可,其内容不得复制或通过电子邮件发送到多个网站或发布到listserv。但是,用户可以打印、下载或通过电子邮件发送文章供个人使用。这可以删节。对副本的准确性不作任何保证。用户应参阅原始出版版本的材料的完整。(版权适用于所有人。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Interdisciplinary Global Studies
International Journal of Interdisciplinary Global Studies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
US Media Framing of Conflict in the Middle East: The Human and Environmental Consequences Post-Soviet Gender Regimes: Militarized Masculinities in the Making of the Russian–Ukrainian War How to be a Democrat in an Authoritarian World? High-Impact Experiential Learning Opportunities through Global Community Engaged Learning Managerial Society: The Managerial Revolution Revisited
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1