Comparative analysis of entrepreneurial intention models: Self-efficacy versus entrepreneurial characteristics

Anne Kathleen L. Rocha, G. H. S. M. Moraes, Ana Iolanda Vodă, R. Quadros
{"title":"Comparative analysis of entrepreneurial intention models: Self-efficacy versus entrepreneurial characteristics","authors":"Anne Kathleen L. Rocha, G. H. S. M. Moraes, Ana Iolanda Vodă, R. Quadros","doi":"10.1590/1678-6971/eramg230209.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this research is to analyze whether self-efficacy and entrepreneurial characteristics (e.g., risk-taking, planning, opportunity recognition, persistence, sociability, innovation, and leadership) differ in the explanation of entrepreneurial intention models, having entrepreneurial education as a moderator of relationships. Originality/value: This paper offers an in-depth perspective on which behavioral characteristics fit best into entrepreneurial intention models and helps to fill a theoretical and practical gap on the need for university education to increase its positive impact on human capital, particularly on students’ professional skills, demonstrating which characteristics are most impacted by entrepreneurial education. Design/methodology/approach: Quantitative methodology was employed, and data were analyzed with structural equation modeling. The sample consisted of 1,004 Brazilian university students from public and private universities. The research was conducted in a non-probabilistic way and with a convenience sample. In order to address the research hypothesis and objectives, all constructs were adapted from relevant literature on entrepreneurship. Findings: The results indicate it seems more appropriate to use a set of entrepreneurial characteristics when investigating an entrepreneurial intention model if you are looking for a higher explanatory factor and a more robust model; also, entrepreneurial characteristics represent a more sensitive model, which brings accurate assessments on factors that affect entrepreneurial intention. With these findings, entrepreneurial education can be planned to shape certain characteristics through actions in the university environment, making it possible to measure the impact of education on entrepreneurial intention.","PeriodicalId":37120,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Administracao Mackenzie","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Administracao Mackenzie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eramg230209.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this research is to analyze whether self-efficacy and entrepreneurial characteristics (e.g., risk-taking, planning, opportunity recognition, persistence, sociability, innovation, and leadership) differ in the explanation of entrepreneurial intention models, having entrepreneurial education as a moderator of relationships. Originality/value: This paper offers an in-depth perspective on which behavioral characteristics fit best into entrepreneurial intention models and helps to fill a theoretical and practical gap on the need for university education to increase its positive impact on human capital, particularly on students’ professional skills, demonstrating which characteristics are most impacted by entrepreneurial education. Design/methodology/approach: Quantitative methodology was employed, and data were analyzed with structural equation modeling. The sample consisted of 1,004 Brazilian university students from public and private universities. The research was conducted in a non-probabilistic way and with a convenience sample. In order to address the research hypothesis and objectives, all constructs were adapted from relevant literature on entrepreneurship. Findings: The results indicate it seems more appropriate to use a set of entrepreneurial characteristics when investigating an entrepreneurial intention model if you are looking for a higher explanatory factor and a more robust model; also, entrepreneurial characteristics represent a more sensitive model, which brings accurate assessments on factors that affect entrepreneurial intention. With these findings, entrepreneurial education can be planned to shape certain characteristics through actions in the university environment, making it possible to measure the impact of education on entrepreneurial intention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创业意向模型的比较分析:自我效能感与创业特征
摘要目的:本研究的目的是分析自我效能感和创业特征(如冒险、计划、机会识别、坚持、社交、创新和领导力)在创业意向模型的解释中是否存在差异,其中创业教育是调节关系的调节因子。独创性/价值:本文深入探讨了哪些行为特征最适合创业意向模型,并有助于填补大学教育对人力资本,特别是对学生专业技能的积极影响的理论和实践空白,展示了创业教育对哪些特征的影响最大。设计/方法/方法:采用定量方法,采用结构方程模型分析数据。样本包括1004名来自巴西公立和私立大学的大学生。本研究采用非概率方法,样本选取方便。为了解决研究假设和目标,所有结构都改编自创业相关文献。研究结果表明,在研究创业意向模型时,如果要寻找更高的解释因子和更稳健的模型,使用一组创业特征似乎更合适;创业特征是一个较为敏感的模型,可以对影响创业意愿的因素进行较为准确的评估。根据这些发现,创业教育可以通过在大学环境中的行动来计划塑造某些特征,从而可以衡量教育对创业意愿的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Administracao Mackenzie
Revista de Administracao Mackenzie Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nasalance, Nasal Airflow and Perceived Nasality in Carnatic Singers and Non-singers. Effects of resilience and managerial attitudes on the relation between participative budgeting and managerial performance Churning of human resources: A proposal for a theoretical-methodological model Behavioral training of engineering professionals and students for Industry 4.0 Sociodemographic and occupational profiles of organizational commitment in federal universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1