Does a cluster promote innovation and productivity in its firms?

Rodrigo J. S. Rocha, F. Paula, J. F. Silva
{"title":"Does a cluster promote innovation and productivity in its firms?","authors":"Rodrigo J. S. Rocha, F. Paula, J. F. Silva","doi":"10.1590/1678-6971/eramr220103.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: The fierce competition in a globalized market forces firms to adopt innovative strategies to obtain a competitive advantage over their competitors. However, innovating is a difficult task to accomplish in isolation. One way to mitigate this isolation is to separate organizations into sectoral clusters, facilitating the search for innovation and productivity. From this perspective, this research aims to compare the relationship between innovation performance (IP) and the productivity of Brazilian firms, considering whether they are inserted into clusters or not, and analyze their implemented internal and external research and development (R&D) strategies. Originality/value: This article expands the literature’s understanding of open innovation, testing the complementary role of internal and external R&D for the implementation of innovation in firms using a relevant contextual condition: their presence or absence in a cluster. The study helps to enhance the understanding of several mechanisms by which the cluster helps to promote innovation and productivity. Design/methodology/approach: To test the hypotheses, the study used multigroup structural equation modeling in a sample of 5,581 companies, with 1,878 cluster participants and 3,703 non-participants. Findings: The results support a positive impact of both external and internal R&D on IP and support the notion that IP, regardless of whether or not the firm is part of a cluster, positively impacts its productivity. The external and internal R&D, in turn, proved to be complementary only for companies inside a cluster.","PeriodicalId":37120,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Administracao Mackenzie","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Administracao Mackenzie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eramr220103.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective: The fierce competition in a globalized market forces firms to adopt innovative strategies to obtain a competitive advantage over their competitors. However, innovating is a difficult task to accomplish in isolation. One way to mitigate this isolation is to separate organizations into sectoral clusters, facilitating the search for innovation and productivity. From this perspective, this research aims to compare the relationship between innovation performance (IP) and the productivity of Brazilian firms, considering whether they are inserted into clusters or not, and analyze their implemented internal and external research and development (R&D) strategies. Originality/value: This article expands the literature’s understanding of open innovation, testing the complementary role of internal and external R&D for the implementation of innovation in firms using a relevant contextual condition: their presence or absence in a cluster. The study helps to enhance the understanding of several mechanisms by which the cluster helps to promote innovation and productivity. Design/methodology/approach: To test the hypotheses, the study used multigroup structural equation modeling in a sample of 5,581 companies, with 1,878 cluster participants and 3,703 non-participants. Findings: The results support a positive impact of both external and internal R&D on IP and support the notion that IP, regardless of whether or not the firm is part of a cluster, positively impacts its productivity. The external and internal R&D, in turn, proved to be complementary only for companies inside a cluster.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
集群能促进企业的创新和生产力吗?
摘要目的:全球化市场的激烈竞争迫使企业采取创新战略以获得竞争优势。然而,创新是一项难以孤立完成的任务。减轻这种孤立的一种方法是将组织分成部门集群,促进寻求创新和生产力。从这个角度出发,本研究旨在比较巴西企业创新绩效(IP)与生产率之间的关系,考虑它们是否加入集群,并分析它们实施的内部和外部研发(R&D)战略。原创性/价值:本文扩展了文献对开放式创新的理解,使用相关的背景条件:企业在集群中存在或不存在,测试了内部和外部研发对企业实施创新的互补作用。该研究有助于加深对集群促进创新和生产力的若干机制的理解。设计/方法/方法:为了验证假设,该研究在5,581家公司的样本中使用了多组结构方程模型,其中1,878家集群参与者和3,703家非参与者。研究发现:研究结果支持了外部和内部研发对知识产权的积极影响,并支持了无论企业是否属于集群的一部分,知识产权都会对其生产率产生积极影响的观点。外部和内部的研发,反过来,证明是互补的,只有在一个集群内的公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Administracao Mackenzie
Revista de Administracao Mackenzie Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nasalance, Nasal Airflow and Perceived Nasality in Carnatic Singers and Non-singers. Effects of resilience and managerial attitudes on the relation between participative budgeting and managerial performance Churning of human resources: A proposal for a theoretical-methodological model Behavioral training of engineering professionals and students for Industry 4.0 Sociodemographic and occupational profiles of organizational commitment in federal universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1