Measuring the sustainability impact in local governments using the quadruple bottom line

Haris Alibašić
{"title":"Measuring the sustainability impact in local governments using the quadruple bottom line","authors":"Haris Alibašić","doi":"10.18848/2325-1166/CGP/V13I03/37-45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ING AND INDEXING For a full list of databases in which this journal is indexed, please visit www.onsustainability.com/journals/collection. RESEARCH NETWORK MEMBERSHIP Authors in The International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice are members of the On Sustainability Research Network or a thematically related Research Network. Members receive access to journal content. To find out more, visit www.onsustainability.com/about/become-a-member. SUBSCRIPTIONS The International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice is available in electronic and print formats. Subscribe to gain access to content from the current year and the entire backlist. Contact us at support@cgnetworks.org. ORDERING Single articles and issues are available from the journal bookstore at www.cgscholar.com/bookstore. HYBRID OPEN ACCESS The International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice is Hybrid Open Access, meaning authors can choose to make their articles open access. This allows their work to reach an even wider audience, broadening the dissemination of their research. To find out more, please visit www.onsustainability.com/journals/hybrid-open-access. DISCLAIMER The authors, editors, and publisher will not accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may have been made in this publication. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein. The International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice Volume 13, Issue 3, 2017, www.onsustainability.com © Common Ground Research Networks, Haris Alibašić Some Rights Reserved, (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Permissions: support@cgnetworks.org ISSN: 2325-1166 (Print), ISSN: 2325-1182 (Online) http://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1166/CGP/v13i03/37-45 (Article) Measuring the Sustainability Impact in Local Governments Using the Quadruple Bottom Line Haris Alibašić, University of West Florida, USA Abstract: Sustainability is utilized by cities to enable a multifaceted, cross-sectoral approach for the betterment of communities and operational efficiency of organizations. Using a case study of the medium size local government in the Midwest and the city’s application of sustainability planning, this article focuses on a development of an expanded definition of the bottom line and a nascent approach to measuring and tracking sustainability-related efforts. The research provides an overview of measuring sustainability adopted by this particular city, using the target-specific, extended quadruple bottom line approach. The method attempts to address economic vitality, environmental quality, social equity, and governmental accountability through governance. The use of the quadruple bottom line to measure sustainability is linked to its annual budget planning and investments in transformation-related initiatives. While such an approach to measuring sustainability progress is unique in the United States, a number of cities in Australia have also adopted the quadruple bottom line approach to measure sustainability. Lessons in reporting sustainability efforts using the quadruple bottom line, in the context of an efficient and effective service delivery, can be applied to other local governments. Sustainability is utilized by cities to enable a multifaceted, cross-sectoral approach for the betterment of communities and operational efficiency of organizations. Using a case study of the medium size local government in the Midwest and the city’s application of sustainability planning, this article focuses on a development of an expanded definition of the bottom line and a nascent approach to measuring and tracking sustainability-related efforts. The research provides an overview of measuring sustainability adopted by this particular city, using the target-specific, extended quadruple bottom line approach. The method attempts to address economic vitality, environmental quality, social equity, and governmental accountability through governance. The use of the quadruple bottom line to measure sustainability is linked to its annual budget planning and investments in transformation-related initiatives. While such an approach to measuring sustainability progress is unique in the United States, a number of cities in Australia have also adopted the quadruple bottom line approach to measure sustainability. Lessons in reporting sustainability efforts using the quadruple bottom line, in the context of an efficient and effective service delivery, can be applied to other local governments.","PeriodicalId":38204,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice","volume":"13 1","pages":"37-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1166/CGP/V13I03/37-45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

ING AND INDEXING For a full list of databases in which this journal is indexed, please visit www.onsustainability.com/journals/collection. RESEARCH NETWORK MEMBERSHIP Authors in The International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice are members of the On Sustainability Research Network or a thematically related Research Network. Members receive access to journal content. To find out more, visit www.onsustainability.com/about/become-a-member. SUBSCRIPTIONS The International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice is available in electronic and print formats. Subscribe to gain access to content from the current year and the entire backlist. Contact us at support@cgnetworks.org. ORDERING Single articles and issues are available from the journal bookstore at www.cgscholar.com/bookstore. HYBRID OPEN ACCESS The International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice is Hybrid Open Access, meaning authors can choose to make their articles open access. This allows their work to reach an even wider audience, broadening the dissemination of their research. To find out more, please visit www.onsustainability.com/journals/hybrid-open-access. DISCLAIMER The authors, editors, and publisher will not accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may have been made in this publication. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein. The International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice Volume 13, Issue 3, 2017, www.onsustainability.com © Common Ground Research Networks, Haris Alibašić Some Rights Reserved, (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Permissions: support@cgnetworks.org ISSN: 2325-1166 (Print), ISSN: 2325-1182 (Online) http://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1166/CGP/v13i03/37-45 (Article) Measuring the Sustainability Impact in Local Governments Using the Quadruple Bottom Line Haris Alibašić, University of West Florida, USA Abstract: Sustainability is utilized by cities to enable a multifaceted, cross-sectoral approach for the betterment of communities and operational efficiency of organizations. Using a case study of the medium size local government in the Midwest and the city’s application of sustainability planning, this article focuses on a development of an expanded definition of the bottom line and a nascent approach to measuring and tracking sustainability-related efforts. The research provides an overview of measuring sustainability adopted by this particular city, using the target-specific, extended quadruple bottom line approach. The method attempts to address economic vitality, environmental quality, social equity, and governmental accountability through governance. The use of the quadruple bottom line to measure sustainability is linked to its annual budget planning and investments in transformation-related initiatives. While such an approach to measuring sustainability progress is unique in the United States, a number of cities in Australia have also adopted the quadruple bottom line approach to measure sustainability. Lessons in reporting sustainability efforts using the quadruple bottom line, in the context of an efficient and effective service delivery, can be applied to other local governments. Sustainability is utilized by cities to enable a multifaceted, cross-sectoral approach for the betterment of communities and operational efficiency of organizations. Using a case study of the medium size local government in the Midwest and the city’s application of sustainability planning, this article focuses on a development of an expanded definition of the bottom line and a nascent approach to measuring and tracking sustainability-related efforts. The research provides an overview of measuring sustainability adopted by this particular city, using the target-specific, extended quadruple bottom line approach. The method attempts to address economic vitality, environmental quality, social equity, and governmental accountability through governance. The use of the quadruple bottom line to measure sustainability is linked to its annual budget planning and investments in transformation-related initiatives. While such an approach to measuring sustainability progress is unique in the United States, a number of cities in Australia have also adopted the quadruple bottom line approach to measure sustainability. Lessons in reporting sustainability efforts using the quadruple bottom line, in the context of an efficient and effective service delivery, can be applied to other local governments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用四重底线衡量地方政府的可持续性影响
ING和索引本期刊被索引的数据库的完整列表,请访问www.onsustainability.com/journals/collection。《国际可持续发展政策与实践杂志》的作者是可持续发展研究网络或相关主题研究网络的成员。会员可以访问期刊内容。欲了解更多信息,请访问www.onsustainability.com/about/become-a-member。《国际可持续发展政策与实践杂志》有电子版和印刷版。订阅获得访问从今年的内容和整个后备名单。请通过support@cgnetworks.org联系我们。订购单篇文章和问题可从www.cgscholar.com/bookstore期刊书店获得。《国际可持续发展政策与实践杂志》是混合开放获取,这意味着作者可以选择让他们的文章开放获取。这使得他们的工作能够接触到更广泛的受众,扩大了他们研究的传播范围。欲了解更多信息,请访问www.onsustainability.com/journals/hybrid-open-access。免责声明作者、编辑和出版商不会对本出版物中可能出现的任何错误或遗漏承担任何法律责任。出版商不做任何保证,明示或暗示,就材料包含在这里。国际可持续发展政策与实践杂志第13卷,2017年第3期,www.onsustainability.com©Common Ground Research Networks, Haris Alibašić版权所有,(CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)。许可:support@cgnetworks.org ISSN: 2325-1166(印刷),ISSN: 2325-1182(在线)http://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1166/CGP/v13i03/37-45(文章)利用四重底线衡量可持续性对地方政府的影响哈里斯Alibašić,美国西佛罗里达大学摘要:城市利用可持续性来实现多方面、跨部门的方法,以改善社区和组织的运营效率。本文通过对中西部中型地方政府的案例研究和城市可持续发展规划的应用,重点介绍了底线的扩展定义的发展,以及衡量和跟踪可持续发展相关工作的新方法。该研究概述了该城市采用的具体目标、扩展的四重底线方法来衡量可持续性。该方法试图通过治理来解决经济活力、环境质量、社会公平和政府责任问题。使用四重底线来衡量可持续性,与其年度预算计划和对转型相关举措的投资有关。虽然这种衡量可持续性进展的方法在美国是独一无二的,但澳大利亚的一些城市也采用了四倍底线的方法来衡量可持续性。在高效和有效的服务提供背景下,利用四重底线报告可持续发展工作的经验可以应用于其他地方政府。城市利用可持续发展来实现多方面、跨部门的方法,以改善社区和组织的运作效率。本文通过对中西部中型地方政府的案例研究和城市可持续发展规划的应用,重点介绍了底线的扩展定义的发展,以及衡量和跟踪可持续发展相关工作的新方法。该研究概述了该城市采用的具体目标、扩展的四重底线方法来衡量可持续性。该方法试图通过治理来解决经济活力、环境质量、社会公平和政府责任问题。使用四重底线来衡量可持续性,与其年度预算计划和对转型相关举措的投资有关。虽然这种衡量可持续性进展的方法在美国是独一无二的,但澳大利亚的一些城市也采用了四倍底线的方法来衡量可持续性。在高效和有效的服务提供背景下,利用四重底线报告可持续发展工作的经验可以应用于其他地方政府。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice
International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Determinants of Simultaneous Adoption of Sustainable Land Management Practices under a Changing Climate in Côte d'Ivoire Eco-Dogmatism: Nature’s Values and Rights in High-Level Environmental Governance Initiatives Power in Policymaking: Origin and Influence Problem-Based Learning, Social Sustainability, and Soccer as a Comprehensive Strategy for Reaching Out to Vulnerable Communities in Pandemic Times: A Case Study in Monterrey, Mexico A Case Study on the Blended Reporting Phenomenon: A Comparative Analysis of Voluntary Reporting Frameworks and Standards—GRI, IR, SASB, and CDP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1