Factors Affecting the Potential of Solid Waste Management of Network Partners in the Epidemic Control Area for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Mae Sot, Thailand

S. Kamvanin, Narongsak Noosorn
{"title":"Factors Affecting the Potential of Solid Waste Management of Network Partners in the Epidemic Control Area for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Mae Sot, Thailand","authors":"S. Kamvanin, Narongsak Noosorn","doi":"10.18848/2325-1166/cgp/v18i02/13-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This investigation examines the potential, and the factors affecting the potential of network partners to manage solid waste in the epidemic control area for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). The study area was Mae Sot Municipality in Tak Province, Northern Thailand, which consists of twenty communities. This is an especially pressing study topic given the dearth of literature on solid waste management in Thailand during a pandemic. The sample group was purposively selected, and was composed of household representatives living within the coronavirus epidemic control area. Data was gathered using a quantitative research method. A questionnaire was presented to 400 household representatives. Data results led to the development of an equation to determine waste management potential: Logit(y) = 0.435 − 0.086(X1) − 0.203(X2) − 0.110(X3) + 0.086(X4) + 0.046(X5) − 0.056(X6) + 0.157(X7) + 0.132(X8) + 0.214(X9) − 0.212(X10) − 0.087(X11) + 0.022(X12). Factors affecting public participation in waste management of network partners in epidemic control areas can be written as a predictive equation: Logit(y) = −0.179 + 0.092(PAR1) + 0.177(PAR2) − 0.189(PAR3) + 0.008(PAR4). Potential factors affecting the waste management of network partners in epidemic control areas can be written as follows: Logit(y) = −0.724 + 0.220(POT1) + 0.045(POT2) − 0.234(POT3) + 0.185(POT4). Solid waste management models must be suitable for the context and current situation in the local community. This includes consideration of local participation and the impact on all stakeholders in the area. The key action is to minimize the amount of solid waste before it reaches the disposal stage by focusing on participation from all sectors.","PeriodicalId":38204,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1166/cgp/v18i02/13-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This investigation examines the potential, and the factors affecting the potential of network partners to manage solid waste in the epidemic control area for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). The study area was Mae Sot Municipality in Tak Province, Northern Thailand, which consists of twenty communities. This is an especially pressing study topic given the dearth of literature on solid waste management in Thailand during a pandemic. The sample group was purposively selected, and was composed of household representatives living within the coronavirus epidemic control area. Data was gathered using a quantitative research method. A questionnaire was presented to 400 household representatives. Data results led to the development of an equation to determine waste management potential: Logit(y) = 0.435 − 0.086(X1) − 0.203(X2) − 0.110(X3) + 0.086(X4) + 0.046(X5) − 0.056(X6) + 0.157(X7) + 0.132(X8) + 0.214(X9) − 0.212(X10) − 0.087(X11) + 0.022(X12). Factors affecting public participation in waste management of network partners in epidemic control areas can be written as a predictive equation: Logit(y) = −0.179 + 0.092(PAR1) + 0.177(PAR2) − 0.189(PAR3) + 0.008(PAR4). Potential factors affecting the waste management of network partners in epidemic control areas can be written as follows: Logit(y) = −0.724 + 0.220(POT1) + 0.045(POT2) − 0.234(POT3) + 0.185(POT4). Solid waste management models must be suitable for the context and current situation in the local community. This includes consideration of local participation and the impact on all stakeholders in the area. The key action is to minimize the amount of solid waste before it reaches the disposal stage by focusing on participation from all sectors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响泰国湄索2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情控制区网络合作伙伴固体废物管理潜力的因素
本研究旨在探讨2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情控制区固体废物管理网络合作伙伴的潜力及其影响因素。研究区域为泰国北部德省湄索市,由20个社区组成。鉴于缺乏关于大流行期间泰国固体废物管理的文献,这是一个特别紧迫的研究课题。样本组是有目的选择的,由居住在冠状病毒疫情控制区内的家庭代表组成。采用定量研究方法收集数据。向400名住户代表分发了一份调查表。数据结果导致了一个方程的发展,以确定废物管理潜力:Logit(y) = 0.435−0.086(X1)−0.203(X2)−0.110(X3) + 0.086(X4) + 0.046(X5)−0.056(X6) + 0.157(X7) + 0.132(X8) + 0.214(X9)−0.212(X10)−0.087(X11) + 0.022(X12)。影响疫情控制区网络伙伴废弃物管理公众参与的因素可以写成Logit(y) = - 0.179 + 0.092(PAR1) + 0.177(PAR2) - 0.189(PAR3) + 0.008(PAR4)的预测方程。影响疫情控制区网络伙伴废弃物管理的潜在因素可表示为:Logit(y) = - 0.724 + 0.220(POT1) + 0.045(POT2) - 0.234(POT3) + 0.185(POT4)。固体废物管理模式必须适合当地社区的背景和现状。这包括考虑当地的参与以及对该地区所有利益相关者的影响。关键的行动是通过注重所有部门的参与,在固体废物到达处置阶段之前尽量减少固体废物的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice
International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Determinants of Simultaneous Adoption of Sustainable Land Management Practices under a Changing Climate in Côte d'Ivoire Eco-Dogmatism: Nature’s Values and Rights in High-Level Environmental Governance Initiatives Power in Policymaking: Origin and Influence Problem-Based Learning, Social Sustainability, and Soccer as a Comprehensive Strategy for Reaching Out to Vulnerable Communities in Pandemic Times: A Case Study in Monterrey, Mexico A Case Study on the Blended Reporting Phenomenon: A Comparative Analysis of Voluntary Reporting Frameworks and Standards—GRI, IR, SASB, and CDP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1