Haptic feedback improves surgeons' user experience and fracture reduction in facial trauma simulation.

S. Girod, Sara C. Schvartzman, D. Gaudillière, K. Salisbury, Rebeka G. Silva
{"title":"Haptic feedback improves surgeons' user experience and fracture reduction in facial trauma simulation.","authors":"S. Girod, Sara C. Schvartzman, D. Gaudillière, K. Salisbury, Rebeka G. Silva","doi":"10.1682/JRRD.2015.03.0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computer-assisted surgical (CAS) planning tools are available for craniofacial surgery, but are usually based on computer-aided design (CAD) tools that lack the ability to detect the collision of virtual objects (i.e., fractured bone segments). We developed a CAS system featuring a sense of touch (haptic) that enables surgeons to physically interact with individual, patient-specific anatomy and immerse in a three-dimensional virtual environment. In this study, we evaluated initial user experience with our novel system compared to an existing CAD system. Ten surgery resident trainees received a brief verbal introduction to both the haptic and CAD systems. Users simulated mandibular fracture reduction in three clinical cases within a 15 min time limit for each system and completed a questionnaire to assess their subjective experience. We compared standard landmarks and linear and angular measurements between the simulated results and the actual surgical outcome and found that haptic simulation results were not significantly different from actual postoperative outcomes. In contrast, CAD results significantly differed from both the haptic simulation and actual postoperative results. In addition to enabling a more accurate fracture repair, the haptic system provided a better user experience than the CAD system in terms of intuitiveness and self-reported quality of repair.","PeriodicalId":50065,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1682/JRRD.2015.03.0043","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2015.03.0043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Computer-assisted surgical (CAS) planning tools are available for craniofacial surgery, but are usually based on computer-aided design (CAD) tools that lack the ability to detect the collision of virtual objects (i.e., fractured bone segments). We developed a CAS system featuring a sense of touch (haptic) that enables surgeons to physically interact with individual, patient-specific anatomy and immerse in a three-dimensional virtual environment. In this study, we evaluated initial user experience with our novel system compared to an existing CAD system. Ten surgery resident trainees received a brief verbal introduction to both the haptic and CAD systems. Users simulated mandibular fracture reduction in three clinical cases within a 15 min time limit for each system and completed a questionnaire to assess their subjective experience. We compared standard landmarks and linear and angular measurements between the simulated results and the actual surgical outcome and found that haptic simulation results were not significantly different from actual postoperative outcomes. In contrast, CAD results significantly differed from both the haptic simulation and actual postoperative results. In addition to enabling a more accurate fracture repair, the haptic system provided a better user experience than the CAD system in terms of intuitiveness and self-reported quality of repair.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
触觉反馈改善了外科医生在面部创伤模拟中的用户体验和骨折减少。
计算机辅助手术(CAS)规划工具可用于颅面外科手术,但通常基于计算机辅助设计(CAD)工具,缺乏检测虚拟物体碰撞(即骨折骨段)的能力。我们开发了一种具有触觉(触觉)的CAS系统,使外科医生能够与个体,患者特定解剖结构进行物理交互,并沉浸在三维虚拟环境中。在这项研究中,我们评估了与现有CAD系统相比,我们的新系统的初始用户体验。10名外科住院医师接受了触觉和CAD系统的简短口头介绍。用户在每个系统15分钟的时间内模拟了三个临床病例的下颌骨折复位,并完成了一份问卷来评估他们的主观体验。我们比较了模拟结果与实际手术结果之间的标准地标和线性和角度测量结果,发现触觉模拟结果与实际手术结果没有显著差异。相比之下,CAD结果与触觉模拟和实际术后结果均有显著差异。除了实现更准确的骨折修复外,触觉系统在直观性和自我报告的修复质量方面提供了比CAD系统更好的用户体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.64
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bodies in Motion Chronic Effects of Exposure to High-Intensity Blasts: Results of Tests of Central Auditory Processing Relationship between symptoms and family relationships in Veterans with serious mental illness Pain and psychiatric comorbidities among two groups of Iraq and Afghanistan era Veterans. Effects of cognitive load and prosthetic liner on volitional response times to vibrotactile feedback.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1