Development alternatives for arms production in Russia during the reign of Peter the Great (the late 17th - first quarter of the 18th centuries) as reflected in Russian historiography

IF 0.1 Q4 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Tomsk State University Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17223/15617793/480/9
T. V. Alekseev
{"title":"Development alternatives for arms production in Russia during the reign of Peter the Great (the late 17th - first quarter of the 18th centuries) as reflected in Russian historiography","authors":"T. V. Alekseev","doi":"10.17223/15617793/480/9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper looks at how the production infrastructure for the firearms branch of the military industry emerged in Russia during the reign of Peter the Great (1689-1725). The objective of the study is to identify alternative development patterns for this industry, both in terms of methods of organizing arms production and its geographical location. In the study, the author referred to the works of Russian researchers from the pre-revolutionary, Soviet, and postSoviet periods; their historiographic analysis makes it possible to reach the research objective. Aside from the traditional methods like analysis and rising from the concrete to the abstract, common for philosophical studies, the author also applied research methods specific to history: problem chronology and prospective analysis. The research demonstrates that during Peter the Great's reign, the development of the firearms supply system for the armed forces was influenced by two trends, which took two different directions: one was the encouragement of private initiative; the other was the development of a state-funded network of arms enterprises and the centralization of the arms business in the arms makers' community (sloboda) in Tula. Ultimately, the latter trend prevailed, and the government focused its efforts on expanding the geography of arms production and searching for the most optimal location where arms enterprises could be deployed. The study documents the fate of all potential arms production hubs that emerged during Peter the Great's reign. Some of them never left the initial proposal stage (Yaroslavl, Ustyuzhna Zheleznopolskaya, ore processing plants in the Urals). Others did play a certain role in supplying the Russian army with firearms during the challenging period of the Great Northern War but gradually ceased their operations when the war was over (the Olonets plants (Lipetsk and Petrovsky plants), the arms enterprise in Tobolsk). Moscow, which used to be an important firearms production hub before Peter rose to the throne, lost this status under the new ruler, just as its status as Russia's capital. The new capital, St. Petersburg, was never even intended to be an arms hub. In the author's opinion, the government policy on building up Russia's arms industry prioritized the development of the long-established production assets in Tula (Tula Arms Plant) and the construction of a new arms plant in Sestroretsk, northwest Russia, within immediate reach of the Great Northern War's front lines. These state enterprises, along with the Izhevsk Arms Plant, which was built in the early 19th century, became the key suppliers of firearms for the Russian army and navy throughout the entire imperial period.","PeriodicalId":45402,"journal":{"name":"Tomsk State University Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tomsk State University Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/480/9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper looks at how the production infrastructure for the firearms branch of the military industry emerged in Russia during the reign of Peter the Great (1689-1725). The objective of the study is to identify alternative development patterns for this industry, both in terms of methods of organizing arms production and its geographical location. In the study, the author referred to the works of Russian researchers from the pre-revolutionary, Soviet, and postSoviet periods; their historiographic analysis makes it possible to reach the research objective. Aside from the traditional methods like analysis and rising from the concrete to the abstract, common for philosophical studies, the author also applied research methods specific to history: problem chronology and prospective analysis. The research demonstrates that during Peter the Great's reign, the development of the firearms supply system for the armed forces was influenced by two trends, which took two different directions: one was the encouragement of private initiative; the other was the development of a state-funded network of arms enterprises and the centralization of the arms business in the arms makers' community (sloboda) in Tula. Ultimately, the latter trend prevailed, and the government focused its efforts on expanding the geography of arms production and searching for the most optimal location where arms enterprises could be deployed. The study documents the fate of all potential arms production hubs that emerged during Peter the Great's reign. Some of them never left the initial proposal stage (Yaroslavl, Ustyuzhna Zheleznopolskaya, ore processing plants in the Urals). Others did play a certain role in supplying the Russian army with firearms during the challenging period of the Great Northern War but gradually ceased their operations when the war was over (the Olonets plants (Lipetsk and Petrovsky plants), the arms enterprise in Tobolsk). Moscow, which used to be an important firearms production hub before Peter rose to the throne, lost this status under the new ruler, just as its status as Russia's capital. The new capital, St. Petersburg, was never even intended to be an arms hub. In the author's opinion, the government policy on building up Russia's arms industry prioritized the development of the long-established production assets in Tula (Tula Arms Plant) and the construction of a new arms plant in Sestroretsk, northwest Russia, within immediate reach of the Great Northern War's front lines. These state enterprises, along with the Izhevsk Arms Plant, which was built in the early 19th century, became the key suppliers of firearms for the Russian army and navy throughout the entire imperial period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯史学反映了彼得大帝统治时期(17世纪末- 18世纪上半叶)俄罗斯武器生产的发展选择
本文着眼于彼得大帝统治时期(1689-1725)俄罗斯军事工业中火器分支的生产基础设施是如何出现的。这项研究的目的是在组织武器生产的方法和其地理位置方面确定这一工业的其他发展模式。在研究中,作者参考了革命前、苏联和后苏联时期俄罗斯研究人员的著作;他们的史学分析使研究目标的达成成为可能。除了哲学研究中常用的分析、具象到抽象等传统方法外,笔者还运用了历史学特有的研究方法:问题年代学和前瞻性分析。研究表明,彼得大帝统治时期,军队枪支供应制度的发展受到两种趋势的影响,这两种趋势呈现出两个不同的方向:一是鼓励私人主动性;另一个是国家资助的武器企业网络的发展和武器业务集中在图拉的武器制造商社区(sloboda)。最后,后一种趋势占了上风,政府把精力集中在扩大武器生产的地理位置上,并寻找可以部署武器企业的最优地点。这项研究记录了彼得大帝统治时期出现的所有潜在武器生产中心的命运。其中一些从未离开最初的提议阶段(雅罗斯拉夫尔、乌斯图日纳热列兹诺波尔斯卡亚、乌拉尔的矿石加工厂)。在大北方战争充满挑战的时期,其他一些工厂确实在为俄罗斯军队提供火器方面发挥了一定的作用,但在战争结束后逐渐停止了运营(Olonets工厂(利佩茨克和彼得罗夫斯基工厂),托博尔斯克的军火企业)。在彼得大帝即位之前,莫斯科曾是重要的武器生产中心,但在新统治者的统治下,莫斯科失去了这一地位,就像失去了俄罗斯首都的地位一样。新首都圣彼得堡甚至从未打算成为一个武器中心。在作者看来,政府建立俄罗斯武器工业的政策优先考虑了在图拉建立已久的生产资产(图拉武器工厂)的发展,并在俄罗斯西北部的谢斯特列茨克建造一个新的武器工厂,紧邻大北方战争的前线。这些国有企业,连同建于19世纪初的伊热夫斯克武器工厂,在整个帝国时期成为俄罗斯陆军和海军的主要武器供应商。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tomsk State University Journal
Tomsk State University Journal MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The influence of nonuniform movement of rubble foundation on bearing capacity of brick walls of a historic building Comparison of experimental pile penetration force and calculated by regulatory documents Cross-section geometry optimization of flexural thread using energy criterion Increasing cement strength properties with electrophysical processing of water-cement suspension Temperature effect on flexural bowl determined by falling weight deflectometer testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1