Challenges of integrated variance estimation in emerging stock markets

Josip Arnerić, M. Matković
{"title":"Challenges of integrated variance estimation in emerging stock markets","authors":"Josip Arnerić, M. Matković","doi":"10.18045/ZBEFRI.2019.2.713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Estimating integrated variance, using high frequency data, requires modelling experience and data crunching skills. Although intraday returns have attracted much attention in recent years, handling these data is challenging because of their unique characteristics. When dealing with ultra-high frequency or tick-by-tick observations the enormous amount of data needs to be processed prior to estimation of integrated variance for two reasons: eliminating microstructure noise and finding appropriate unbiased estimator. This paper contributes to the existing literature in a two ways. First, we propose how to handle quality issues of the high frequency data due to non-frequent trading and lower liquidity of emerging markets. Second, we find the optimal sampling frequency at slow time scale that should be used to obtain two-time scale estimator of integrated variance for each emerging market under consideration: Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria and Croatia. Empirical results indicate that intraday returns should be sampled every 7 to 10 minutes at slow time scale while the fast time scale should be fixed at the highest possible frequency. Realized variance estimator at the fast time scale mostly overestimates the integrated variance on all stock markets except Bulgaria; on average between 70% and 90% of the time. Moreover, the robustness of the results with respect to the price jumps has been verified for Romania and Hungary, unlike Croatia and Bulgaria, for which we recommend a robust version of two-time scale estimator of integrated variance within truncation technique. It is additionally found that intraday returns should be sampled more frequently in a highly volatile periods. These findings offer valuable information to market participants, as they are able to apply the most accurate ex-post volatility measure, as unbiased and consistent estimate of integrated variance.","PeriodicalId":44594,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta u Rijeci-Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta u Rijeci-Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18045/ZBEFRI.2019.2.713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Estimating integrated variance, using high frequency data, requires modelling experience and data crunching skills. Although intraday returns have attracted much attention in recent years, handling these data is challenging because of their unique characteristics. When dealing with ultra-high frequency or tick-by-tick observations the enormous amount of data needs to be processed prior to estimation of integrated variance for two reasons: eliminating microstructure noise and finding appropriate unbiased estimator. This paper contributes to the existing literature in a two ways. First, we propose how to handle quality issues of the high frequency data due to non-frequent trading and lower liquidity of emerging markets. Second, we find the optimal sampling frequency at slow time scale that should be used to obtain two-time scale estimator of integrated variance for each emerging market under consideration: Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria and Croatia. Empirical results indicate that intraday returns should be sampled every 7 to 10 minutes at slow time scale while the fast time scale should be fixed at the highest possible frequency. Realized variance estimator at the fast time scale mostly overestimates the integrated variance on all stock markets except Bulgaria; on average between 70% and 90% of the time. Moreover, the robustness of the results with respect to the price jumps has been verified for Romania and Hungary, unlike Croatia and Bulgaria, for which we recommend a robust version of two-time scale estimator of integrated variance within truncation technique. It is additionally found that intraday returns should be sampled more frequently in a highly volatile periods. These findings offer valuable information to market participants, as they are able to apply the most accurate ex-post volatility measure, as unbiased and consistent estimate of integrated variance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新兴股票市场综合方差估计的挑战
估计综合方差,使用高频数据,需要建模经验和数据处理技能。尽管近年来日内收益备受关注,但由于其独特的特征,处理这些数据具有挑战性。在处理超高频率或逐点观测时,需要在估计综合方差之前处理大量数据,原因有两个:消除微观结构噪声和找到适当的无偏估计器。本文对现有文献的贡献有两个方面。首先,我们提出了如何处理由于新兴市场交易不频繁和流动性较低导致的高频数据质量问题。其次,我们找到了慢时间尺度下的最佳采样频率,该频率应用于获得所考虑的每个新兴市场的综合方差的双时间尺度估计量:罗马尼亚,匈牙利,保加利亚和克罗地亚。实证结果表明,在慢时间尺度下,每日收益应每7 ~ 10分钟采样一次,而在快时间尺度下,应尽可能固定在最高频率。在快速时间尺度上实现的方差估计器大多高估了除保加利亚以外的所有股票市场的综合方差;平均70%到90%的时间。此外,与克罗地亚和保加利亚不同,罗马尼亚和匈牙利的价格跳跃结果的稳健性已经得到验证,我们建议在截断技术中使用综合方差的双时间尺度估计器的稳健版本。此外还发现,在高度波动的时期,应该更频繁地采样日内收益。这些发现为市场参与者提供了有价值的信息,因为他们能够应用最准确的事后波动度量,作为综合方差的无偏和一致估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of board size and ownership concentration on agency costs: evidence for Croatian companies Digital transformation and economic cooperation: The case of Western Balkan countries Income smoothing through loan loss provisions in south and Eastern European banks The effect of regulatory changes on relationship between earnings management and financial reporting timeliness: The case of COVID-19 pandemic The key factors affecting entrepreneurship: a comparative analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1