EU vs EAEU: Youth of the Russian exclave on prospects and barriers of international cooperation

IF 0.1 Q4 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Tomsk State University Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17223/15617793/482/2
Mikhail I. Krishtal, A. Shchekoturov
{"title":"EU vs EAEU: Youth of the Russian exclave on prospects and barriers of international cooperation","authors":"Mikhail I. Krishtal, A. Shchekoturov","doi":"10.17223/15617793/482/2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dynamics of relations between the Kaliningrad region and its neighboring countries demonstrates various strategic approaches for positioning the region: a military outpost, a “development corridor” and a region of international cooperation. The latter option is considered the most promising scenario. However, the effectiveness of the implementation of the program largely depends on the degree of acceptance of the new geopolitical role of the region by the population of the region. First of all, those who represent the cultural and professional future - the youth. Therefore, the aim of this article is to determine the ideas of young people in the Kaliningrad region about the prospects and barriers of international cooperation with the Russian exclave, as well as to record their assessment of the socio-economic, cultural and infrastructural network of interactions with the Eurasian Economic Union and the European Union. The main research method is a sociological survey of young people aged 18-35 in Kaliningrad and border municipalities of the Kaliningrad region. The survey was conducted in May 2021. The research sample consisted of 463 respondents. Depending on the attitude to the EAEU and the EU a typology of Kaliningrad youth is proposed: Eurasians and anti-Eurasians, pro-Europeans and Euro-pessimists. A positive attitude to each integration project (EU and EAEU) significantly prevails among the youth of the Kaliningrad region. The European Union is seen as the region's preferred partner in such areas as culture, science, education, transport and infrastructure, and environmental protection. The Eurasian Economic Union seems to be a more reliable partner for cooperation in the military sphere. The socio-economic and healthcare spheres turn out to be outside of integration agenda. The absolute majority of the respondents supported the development of cooperation with Poland and Lithuania in various fields, especially in the tourism industry. Despite the support for the idea of cross-border cooperation, the majority of the young people demonstrated extremely poor awareness of the main international programs with the Kaliningrad region. They also could not give specific examples of cross-border cooperation. According to the youth, there are such main barriers to cross-border cooperation as the COVID-19 pandemic, the visa regime, the two-sided sanctions of the European Union and Russia, and stereotypes in the perception of Russians by residents of the neighboring countries.","PeriodicalId":45402,"journal":{"name":"Tomsk State University Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tomsk State University Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/482/2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dynamics of relations between the Kaliningrad region and its neighboring countries demonstrates various strategic approaches for positioning the region: a military outpost, a “development corridor” and a region of international cooperation. The latter option is considered the most promising scenario. However, the effectiveness of the implementation of the program largely depends on the degree of acceptance of the new geopolitical role of the region by the population of the region. First of all, those who represent the cultural and professional future - the youth. Therefore, the aim of this article is to determine the ideas of young people in the Kaliningrad region about the prospects and barriers of international cooperation with the Russian exclave, as well as to record their assessment of the socio-economic, cultural and infrastructural network of interactions with the Eurasian Economic Union and the European Union. The main research method is a sociological survey of young people aged 18-35 in Kaliningrad and border municipalities of the Kaliningrad region. The survey was conducted in May 2021. The research sample consisted of 463 respondents. Depending on the attitude to the EAEU and the EU a typology of Kaliningrad youth is proposed: Eurasians and anti-Eurasians, pro-Europeans and Euro-pessimists. A positive attitude to each integration project (EU and EAEU) significantly prevails among the youth of the Kaliningrad region. The European Union is seen as the region's preferred partner in such areas as culture, science, education, transport and infrastructure, and environmental protection. The Eurasian Economic Union seems to be a more reliable partner for cooperation in the military sphere. The socio-economic and healthcare spheres turn out to be outside of integration agenda. The absolute majority of the respondents supported the development of cooperation with Poland and Lithuania in various fields, especially in the tourism industry. Despite the support for the idea of cross-border cooperation, the majority of the young people demonstrated extremely poor awareness of the main international programs with the Kaliningrad region. They also could not give specific examples of cross-border cooperation. According to the youth, there are such main barriers to cross-border cooperation as the COVID-19 pandemic, the visa regime, the two-sided sanctions of the European Union and Russia, and stereotypes in the perception of Russians by residents of the neighboring countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟与欧亚经济联盟:俄罗斯飞地青年对国际合作前景和障碍的看法
加里宁格勒地区与其邻国之间的动态关系表明了该地区定位的各种战略方针:军事前哨、“发展走廊”和国际合作地区。后一种选择被认为是最有希望的方案。然而,该计划实施的有效性在很大程度上取决于该地区人民对该地区新的地缘政治角色的接受程度。首先,那些代表文化和职业未来的人——青年。因此,本文的目的是确定加里宁格勒地区年轻人对与俄罗斯飞地进行国际合作的前景和障碍的看法,并记录他们对与欧亚经济联盟和欧盟互动的社会经济,文化和基础设施网络的评估。主要的研究方法是对加里宁格勒和加里宁格勒地区边境城市18-35岁的年轻人进行社会学调查。该调查于2021年5月进行。研究样本包括463名受访者。根据对欧亚经济联盟和欧盟的态度,加里宁格勒青年的类型被提出:欧亚人和反欧亚人,亲欧洲人和欧洲悲观主义者。加里宁格勒地区的年轻人对每个一体化项目(欧盟和欧亚经济联盟)持积极态度。欧盟被视为该地区在文化、科学、教育、交通和基础设施以及环境保护等领域的首选合作伙伴。在军事领域,欧亚经济联盟似乎是更可靠的合作伙伴。社会经济和医疗保健领域被排除在一体化议程之外。绝大多数受访者支持发展与波兰和立陶宛在各个领域的合作,特别是在旅游业方面。尽管支持跨境合作的想法,但大多数年轻人对与加里宁格勒地区的主要国际项目的认识非常差。他们也无法给出跨界合作的具体例子。青年们认为,跨境合作面临的主要障碍包括新冠肺炎疫情、签证制度、欧盟和俄罗斯的双边制裁以及邻国居民对俄罗斯人的刻板印象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tomsk State University Journal
Tomsk State University Journal MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The influence of nonuniform movement of rubble foundation on bearing capacity of brick walls of a historic building Comparison of experimental pile penetration force and calculated by regulatory documents Cross-section geometry optimization of flexural thread using energy criterion Increasing cement strength properties with electrophysical processing of water-cement suspension Temperature effect on flexural bowl determined by falling weight deflectometer testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1