A PRISMA-driven systematic review of data mining methods used for defects detection and classification in the manufacturing industry

Q3 Engineering Production Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-6513.20210097
Blanka Bártová, V. Bína, Lucie Váchová
{"title":"A PRISMA-driven systematic review of data mining methods used for defects detection and classification in the manufacturing industry","authors":"Blanka Bártová, V. Bína, Lucie Váchová","doi":"10.1590/0103-6513.20210097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paper aims: This research aims to analyze the primary studies published in recent years focusing on defect detection or classification in manufacturing and extract information about frequently used data mining (DM) methods, their accuracy, strengths, and limitations. Originality: Industrial production is now undergoing a dynamic transformation in the context of Industry 4.0, where implementation of data mining is a frequently discussed topic, and such an overall summary is missing. Research method: In this study, the PRISMA-driven systematic literature review is combined with the approach defined by Kitchenham (2004). Main findings: The most frequently used data mining methods for defect detection are Bayesian network (BN) and Support vector machine (SVM). Besides previously mentioned methods, the Decision trees (DT) and Clustering are often used for defect classification. Neural Networks (NN) use is common for both defect detection and classification. DT, together with the Genetic algorithm (GA) and SVM, achieved the highest average accuracy. Recently, authors often combine different DM methods, and also methods for data dimensionality reduction are often used. Implications for theory and practice: This study contributes to the quality management literature by extending a summary of recently used DM methods for defect detection and classification. This summary can help researchers choose a suitable method and build models for achieving its research purpose.","PeriodicalId":34960,"journal":{"name":"Production","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20210097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Paper aims: This research aims to analyze the primary studies published in recent years focusing on defect detection or classification in manufacturing and extract information about frequently used data mining (DM) methods, their accuracy, strengths, and limitations. Originality: Industrial production is now undergoing a dynamic transformation in the context of Industry 4.0, where implementation of data mining is a frequently discussed topic, and such an overall summary is missing. Research method: In this study, the PRISMA-driven systematic literature review is combined with the approach defined by Kitchenham (2004). Main findings: The most frequently used data mining methods for defect detection are Bayesian network (BN) and Support vector machine (SVM). Besides previously mentioned methods, the Decision trees (DT) and Clustering are often used for defect classification. Neural Networks (NN) use is common for both defect detection and classification. DT, together with the Genetic algorithm (GA) and SVM, achieved the highest average accuracy. Recently, authors often combine different DM methods, and also methods for data dimensionality reduction are often used. Implications for theory and practice: This study contributes to the quality management literature by extending a summary of recently used DM methods for defect detection and classification. This summary can help researchers choose a suitable method and build models for achieving its research purpose.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个prisma驱动的数据挖掘方法在制造业中用于缺陷检测和分类的系统回顾
论文目的:本研究旨在分析近年来发表的关于制造业缺陷检测或分类的主要研究,并提取常用数据挖掘(DM)方法的信息,以及它们的准确性、优势和局限性。原创性:在工业4.0的背景下,工业生产正在经历一场动态的变革,其中数据挖掘的实施是一个经常讨论的话题,缺乏这样一个全面的总结。研究方法:本研究采用prisma驱动的系统文献综述与Kitchenham(2004)定义的方法相结合。主要发现:缺陷检测中最常用的数据挖掘方法是贝叶斯网络(BN)和支持向量机(SVM)。除了前面提到的方法,决策树(DT)和聚类通常用于缺陷分类。神经网络(NN)在缺陷检测和分类中都是常用的。DT与遗传算法(GA)和支持向量机(SVM)的平均准确率最高。近年来,作者经常将不同的数据决策方法结合在一起,也经常使用数据降维方法。对理论和实践的启示:本研究通过扩展对最近用于缺陷检测和分类的DM方法的总结,为质量管理文献做出了贡献。这样的总结可以帮助研究者选择合适的方法和建立模型来达到研究目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Production
Production Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: The Produção Journal (Production Journal), ISSN 0103-6513, is a Brazilian Association of Production Engineering (ABEPRO) publication. It was created in 1990 in order to provide a communication medium for academic articles in the Production Engineering field. Since 2002, the Production Engineering Department of Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo (PRO/EPUSP) is responsible for the editorial process of Produção Journal, sponsored by Carlos Alberto Vanzolini Foundation (FCAV). Revista Produção has the tradition of eighteen published volumes and Qualis "B2" evaluation by CAPES in the Engineering III area. For Brazilian academic community it is a top journal in Production Engineering field.
期刊最新文献
Toward the development of a Preparedness and Response Protocol for epidemics and pandemics Healthcare supply chain risk assessment KPIs: an empirical study using PLS-SEM Social Network Analysis in disaster management Action research supported by remote collaboration tools: analysis of two operations management applications Multicriteria negotiation model for selecting sustainable suppliers’ problem in the agribusiness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1