Unveiling undergraduate production engineering students' comprehension of process flow measures

Q3 Engineering Production Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-6513.20220020
Noel Torres Júnior, A. Azevedo, A. Simões, M. Ladeira, P. R. Sousa, Lauro Soares de Freitas
{"title":"Unveiling undergraduate production engineering students' comprehension of process flow measures","authors":"Noel Torres Júnior, A. Azevedo, A. Simões, M. Ladeira, P. R. Sousa, Lauro Soares de Freitas","doi":"10.1590/0103-6513.20220020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paper aims: This study analyzes the comprehension of production engineering students about the influence of some key variables on the process performance measures in a service process. Originality: This paper points out the need for educators to re-evaluate their approaches to teaching the Operations Management (OM) principles related to process flow measures. Research method: This study used scenario-based role-playing experiments with 2×2×2 between-subject factorial design with three independent variables (variability of activities, capacity utilization, and resource pooling) and four dependent variables related to key internal process performance measures (Flow Time, Overall Quality of service, Quality of service employees, and Queue Size). The sample was composed of 178 undergraduate production engineering students from a large university in Brazil from various institution units. Main findings: These results show that students perceived the use of resource pooling as an impactful practice. However, the students did not correctly identify the effects of increasing resource utilization and the variability on flow time and queue size when activities are pooled. Implications for theory and practice: The teaching of basic concepts of OM requires the support of computational tools. Undergraduate courses that contemplate subjects in the field of OM should work more intensely on simulation-based learning.","PeriodicalId":34960,"journal":{"name":"Production","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20220020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Paper aims: This study analyzes the comprehension of production engineering students about the influence of some key variables on the process performance measures in a service process. Originality: This paper points out the need for educators to re-evaluate their approaches to teaching the Operations Management (OM) principles related to process flow measures. Research method: This study used scenario-based role-playing experiments with 2×2×2 between-subject factorial design with three independent variables (variability of activities, capacity utilization, and resource pooling) and four dependent variables related to key internal process performance measures (Flow Time, Overall Quality of service, Quality of service employees, and Queue Size). The sample was composed of 178 undergraduate production engineering students from a large university in Brazil from various institution units. Main findings: These results show that students perceived the use of resource pooling as an impactful practice. However, the students did not correctly identify the effects of increasing resource utilization and the variability on flow time and queue size when activities are pooled. Implications for theory and practice: The teaching of basic concepts of OM requires the support of computational tools. Undergraduate courses that contemplate subjects in the field of OM should work more intensely on simulation-based learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示生产工程本科学生对工艺流程措施的理解
论文目的:本研究分析了生产工程专业学生对服务过程中一些关键变量对过程绩效指标影响的理解。原创性:本文指出教育工作者需要重新评估他们教授与过程流测量相关的操作管理(OM)原则的方法。研究方法:本研究采用基于场景的角色扮演实验,采用2×2×2受试者间因子设计,具有三个自变量(活动可变性、容量利用率和资源池)和四个与关键内部流程绩效指标相关的因变量(流程时间、整体服务质量、服务员工质量和队列大小)。样本由178名来自巴西一所大型大学不同机构单位的生产工程专业本科生组成。主要发现:这些结果表明,学生认为使用资源池是一种有影响力的做法。然而,学生们没有正确地识别出增加资源利用率的影响,以及活动池化时对流时间和队列大小的可变性。对理论和实践的启示:OM基本概念的教学需要计算工具的支持。考虑管理学领域主题的本科课程应该更加注重基于模拟的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Production
Production Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: The Produção Journal (Production Journal), ISSN 0103-6513, is a Brazilian Association of Production Engineering (ABEPRO) publication. It was created in 1990 in order to provide a communication medium for academic articles in the Production Engineering field. Since 2002, the Production Engineering Department of Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo (PRO/EPUSP) is responsible for the editorial process of Produção Journal, sponsored by Carlos Alberto Vanzolini Foundation (FCAV). Revista Produção has the tradition of eighteen published volumes and Qualis "B2" evaluation by CAPES in the Engineering III area. For Brazilian academic community it is a top journal in Production Engineering field.
期刊最新文献
Toward the development of a Preparedness and Response Protocol for epidemics and pandemics Healthcare supply chain risk assessment KPIs: an empirical study using PLS-SEM Social Network Analysis in disaster management Action research supported by remote collaboration tools: analysis of two operations management applications Multicriteria negotiation model for selecting sustainable suppliers’ problem in the agribusiness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1