Adrenal Oligometastases Secondary to Non-small Cell Lung Cancer—What is the Optimal Treatment Approach?

IF 0.7 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Oral History Review Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.17925/OHR.2017.13.02.117
B. Thomsen, A. Fairchild
{"title":"Adrenal Oligometastases Secondary to Non-small Cell Lung Cancer—What is the Optimal Treatment Approach?","authors":"B. Thomsen, A. Fairchild","doi":"10.17925/OHR.2017.13.02.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Five-year overall survival (OS) for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a dismal 1%. However, approximately 7% have limited or solitary metastases, including to the adrenal gland. Radical treatment of these oligometastases (OM) could increase local control and improve OS. Our objective was to critically analyze data describing aggressive treatment of adrenal OM secondary to NSCLC. Methods: A literature search examining English publications describing surgery or radiotherapy (RT) was performed, supplemented by searching reference lists. Case reports of three or fewer patients, and articles from which NSCLCor adrenal-specific clinical outcomes could not be abstracted, were excluded. Results: Twenty-nine studies met eligibility criteria (521 patients), 26 retrospective. No publications directly compare modalities. Four surgery studies described contemporaneous patients treated with palliative chemotherapy (CH) alone. Reported median OS ranged from 9.5–64 months after adrenalectomy, 8–23 months after RT, and 6–8.5 months after CH. Local failure after surgery was 14%, with response rates after RT 57–75%. Both appear well-tolerated. Conclusions: In patients with an adrenal OM secondary to NSCLC, aggressive treatment should be considered. However, due to the paucity of high quality evidence, it is unclear at present whether this approach alters the natural history of the disease.","PeriodicalId":44122,"journal":{"name":"Oral History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral History Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/OHR.2017.13.02.117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Five-year overall survival (OS) for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a dismal 1%. However, approximately 7% have limited or solitary metastases, including to the adrenal gland. Radical treatment of these oligometastases (OM) could increase local control and improve OS. Our objective was to critically analyze data describing aggressive treatment of adrenal OM secondary to NSCLC. Methods: A literature search examining English publications describing surgery or radiotherapy (RT) was performed, supplemented by searching reference lists. Case reports of three or fewer patients, and articles from which NSCLCor adrenal-specific clinical outcomes could not be abstracted, were excluded. Results: Twenty-nine studies met eligibility criteria (521 patients), 26 retrospective. No publications directly compare modalities. Four surgery studies described contemporaneous patients treated with palliative chemotherapy (CH) alone. Reported median OS ranged from 9.5–64 months after adrenalectomy, 8–23 months after RT, and 6–8.5 months after CH. Local failure after surgery was 14%, with response rates after RT 57–75%. Both appear well-tolerated. Conclusions: In patients with an adrenal OM secondary to NSCLC, aggressive treatment should be considered. However, due to the paucity of high quality evidence, it is unclear at present whether this approach alters the natural history of the disease.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非小细胞肺癌继发肾上腺少转移-最佳治疗方法是什么?
背景:IV期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的5年总生存率(OS)为令人沮丧的1%。然而,约7%的患者有局限性或孤立性转移,包括肾上腺转移。根治这些寡转移瘤(OM)可以增加局部控制和改善OS。我们的目的是批判性地分析描述非小细胞肺癌继发性肾上腺OM积极治疗的数据。方法:采用文献检索方法,检索描述手术或放疗(RT)的英文出版物,并检索参考文献表。排除三个或更少患者的病例报告,以及无法提取非小细胞肺癌肾上腺特异性临床结果的文章。结果:29项研究(521例)符合入选标准,26项是回顾性研究。没有出版物直接比较模式。四项手术研究描述了同期患者单独接受姑息性化疗(CH)治疗。报告的中位OS为肾上腺切除术后9.5-64个月,RT后8-23个月,CH后6-8.5个月。手术后局部失败率为14%,RT后有效率为57-75%。两者似乎都能很好地忍受。结论:对于继发于非小细胞肺癌的肾上腺OM患者,应考虑积极治疗。然而,由于缺乏高质量的证据,目前尚不清楚这种方法是否会改变疾病的自然史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
27.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Oral History Review, published by the Oral History Association, is the U.S. journal of record for the theory and practice of oral history and related fields. The journal’s primary mission is to explore the nature and significance of oral history and advance understanding of the field among scholars, educators, practitioners, and the general public. The Review publishes narrative and analytical articles and reviews, in print and multimedia formats, that present and use oral history in unique and significant ways and that contribute to the understanding of the nature of oral history and memory. It seeks previously unpublished works that demonstrate high-quality research and that offer new insight into oral history practice, methodology, theory, and pedagogy. Work published in the journal arises from many fields and disciplines, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of oral history. While based in the U.S., the Review reflects the international scope of the field and encourages work from international authors and about international topics.
期刊最新文献
Literal Belonging: Safe Outdoor Spaces Modeling Oral History Making Tall Tales and Half-Truths: Negotiating Anxiety and Precarity in Contemporary Ahmedabad Tuning In: Emotions, Relations, and Dynamics in the Analysis of an Archived Interview Storytelling in Museums Creating an Oral History Archive of Government Work: The Women in Public Service in Pakistan Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1