Analgesics/Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Preferred Following Implant Placement: A Retrospective Study.

Karthikeyan Murthykumar, A. Rajasekar, G. Kaarthikeyan
{"title":"Analgesics/Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Preferred Following Implant Placement: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Karthikeyan Murthykumar, A. Rajasekar, G. Kaarthikeyan","doi":"10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2021037302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND In dentistry, pain is a rather inevitable perception that often plagues both the care provider and receiver. Pain, which was described by Rene Descartes in the sixteenth century, has been defined as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with tissue damage or described in terms of such damage. Various dental procedures also provoke a perception of anxiety that culminates with pain and exaggerates the perception of pain. Hence, adequate pain control and assurance are of utmost importance during and following implant surgery. AIM The aim of the present study was to assess the analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs preferred following implant placement and also to find an association between gender, age, and various analgesics/anti-inflammatories prescribed following implant surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective data collection was conducted from June 2019 to March 2020 among 200 patients who underwent implant surgery, based on records management system software to analyze the most commonly prescribed analgesics/anti-inflammatory drugs following implant surgery. RESULTS Among 200 patients the frequency distribution showed that 87% of the patients were prescribed with combination of Aceclofenac (100 mg), Paracetamol (325 mg), and Serratiopeptidase (15 mg), 10% of the patients were prescribed with Paracetamol (650 mg), whereas 3% of the patients were prescribed with Piroxicam (20 mg). CONCLUSION The present study showed that combination of Aceclofenac, Paracetamol, and Serratiopeptidase was the commonly prescribed analgesic/anti-inflammatory drug for postoperative pain management following implant placement. Also there was no significant association between gender vs. various analgesics/anti-inflammatory drugs prescribed following implant placement.","PeriodicalId":16125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants","volume":"32 1 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2021037302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND In dentistry, pain is a rather inevitable perception that often plagues both the care provider and receiver. Pain, which was described by Rene Descartes in the sixteenth century, has been defined as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with tissue damage or described in terms of such damage. Various dental procedures also provoke a perception of anxiety that culminates with pain and exaggerates the perception of pain. Hence, adequate pain control and assurance are of utmost importance during and following implant surgery. AIM The aim of the present study was to assess the analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs preferred following implant placement and also to find an association between gender, age, and various analgesics/anti-inflammatories prescribed following implant surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective data collection was conducted from June 2019 to March 2020 among 200 patients who underwent implant surgery, based on records management system software to analyze the most commonly prescribed analgesics/anti-inflammatory drugs following implant surgery. RESULTS Among 200 patients the frequency distribution showed that 87% of the patients were prescribed with combination of Aceclofenac (100 mg), Paracetamol (325 mg), and Serratiopeptidase (15 mg), 10% of the patients were prescribed with Paracetamol (650 mg), whereas 3% of the patients were prescribed with Piroxicam (20 mg). CONCLUSION The present study showed that combination of Aceclofenac, Paracetamol, and Serratiopeptidase was the commonly prescribed analgesic/anti-inflammatory drug for postoperative pain management following implant placement. Also there was no significant association between gender vs. various analgesics/anti-inflammatory drugs prescribed following implant placement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植入后首选镇痛/抗炎药物:一项回顾性研究。
在牙科中,疼痛是一种不可避免的感觉,经常困扰着护理提供者和接受者。16世纪,勒内·笛卡尔描述了疼痛,将其定义为一种与组织损伤相关的不愉快的感觉和情感体验,或者用这种损伤来描述。各种牙科手术也会引起焦虑感,这种焦虑感以疼痛为高潮,并夸大疼痛感。因此,在植入手术期间和之后,适当的疼痛控制和保证是至关重要的。目的本研究的目的是评估种植体植入后首选的镇痛和抗炎药物,并发现性别、年龄和种植体手术后使用的各种镇痛/抗炎药物之间的关系。材料与方法回顾性收集2019年6月至2020年3月200例种植体手术患者的数据,基于记录管理系统软件,分析种植体手术后最常用的镇痛/抗炎药物。结果200例患者中,87%的患者联用乙酰氯芬酸(100 mg)、扑热息痛(325 mg)和塞拉肽酶(15 mg), 10%的患者联用扑热息痛(650 mg), 3%的患者联用吡罗西康(20 mg)。结论本研究显示,Aceclofenac、扑热息痛和Serratiopeptidase联合应用是种植体置入术后疼痛管理的常用镇痛/抗炎药物。此外,性别与植入后使用的各种镇痛/抗炎药物之间也没有显著的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: MEDICAL IMPLANTS are being used in every organ of the human body. Ideally, medical implants must have biomechanical properties comparable to those of autogenous tissues without any adverse effects. In each anatomic site, studies of the long-term effects of medical implants must be undertaken to determine accurately the safety and performance of the implants. Today, implant surgery has become an interdisciplinary undertaking involving a number of skilled and gifted specialists. For example, successful cochlear implants will involve audiologists, audiological physicians, speech and language therapists, otolaryngologists, nurses, neuro-otologists, teachers of the deaf, hearing therapists, cochlear implant manufacturers, and others involved with hearing-impaired and deaf individuals.
期刊最新文献
All-Polyethylene Tibias Equal to Metal-Backed Tibias in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clinical Experience of Dissolvable Calcium Sulfate (Stimulan) Carrier for Antibiotic Delivery in Orthopedic Surgery: A Study of 143 Patients. Do Cementless, Collared Stems Prevent Aseptic Loosening, Subsidence, and Periprosthetic Fracture in Total Hip Arthroplasty? Efficacy of a Surgical versus a Nonsurgical Approach in the Treatment of Peri-Implant Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Evaluation of Edentulous Maxillary and Mandibular Full Arch Implant Supported Rehabilitation Using the All-on-Four Treatment Concept: An 8-Year Follow-Up Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1