Effect of management and probiotic supplementation on growth performance of Muscovy duck

IF 0.2 4区 农林科学 Q4 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Pecuarias Pub Date : 2022-10-28 DOI:10.17533/udea.rccp.v36n3a2
L. A. Arias-Sosa, Alex Rengifo Rojas, Isabel Chavarro-Tulcán, Nataly Poveda-Díaz, J. Vargas-Puentes
{"title":"Effect of management and probiotic supplementation on growth performance of Muscovy duck","authors":"L. A. Arias-Sosa, Alex Rengifo Rojas, Isabel Chavarro-Tulcán, Nataly Poveda-Díaz, J. Vargas-Puentes","doi":"10.17533/udea.rccp.v36n3a2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Farming of Muscovy ducks ( Cairina moschata ) is an important part of the poultry industry in developed countries. However, the lack of research and improvement programs has led to poor productive outcomes in developing regions where this duck breed is important to procure adequate food security. Objective: To evaluate the effect of improved management conditions and the use of commercial probiotics on the growth performance of Muscovy ducks in a semi-intensive system farm in Colombia. Methods: We recorded the weight gain and feed conversion ratio (FCR) of ducks under three treatments: Backyard management, improved management, and improved management plus probiotic supplementation. Results: The backyard farming system led to poor weight gains (male=2,797 g; female=1,605 g) and less efficient FCR (4.06). Improvement of management conditions led to a better (p<0.05) FCR (3.1) and a greater (p<0.05) weight gain (male=2,888 g; female=1,637 g). The FCR under improved management is comparable to those reported in developed duck farming industries, but the final weight was notably lower than those obtained with selected lines. The use of commercial probiotics led to significant (p<0.05) improvement in weight gain (male=2,930 g; female=1,692 g); however, it also increased the FCR (3.5; p<0.05). Conclusions: The improvement of management conditions enhance the productivity of Muscovy ducks, but further genetic selection processes or use of selected lines is required in developing countries such as Colombia. Further studies are required to assess if probiotic supplementation can lead to improvement in Muscovy ducks farming due to the contrasting effect over the weight gain and FCR.","PeriodicalId":49613,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Pecuarias","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Pecuarias","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.v36n3a2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Farming of Muscovy ducks ( Cairina moschata ) is an important part of the poultry industry in developed countries. However, the lack of research and improvement programs has led to poor productive outcomes in developing regions where this duck breed is important to procure adequate food security. Objective: To evaluate the effect of improved management conditions and the use of commercial probiotics on the growth performance of Muscovy ducks in a semi-intensive system farm in Colombia. Methods: We recorded the weight gain and feed conversion ratio (FCR) of ducks under three treatments: Backyard management, improved management, and improved management plus probiotic supplementation. Results: The backyard farming system led to poor weight gains (male=2,797 g; female=1,605 g) and less efficient FCR (4.06). Improvement of management conditions led to a better (p<0.05) FCR (3.1) and a greater (p<0.05) weight gain (male=2,888 g; female=1,637 g). The FCR under improved management is comparable to those reported in developed duck farming industries, but the final weight was notably lower than those obtained with selected lines. The use of commercial probiotics led to significant (p<0.05) improvement in weight gain (male=2,930 g; female=1,692 g); however, it also increased the FCR (3.5; p<0.05). Conclusions: The improvement of management conditions enhance the productivity of Muscovy ducks, but further genetic selection processes or use of selected lines is required in developing countries such as Colombia. Further studies are required to assess if probiotic supplementation can lead to improvement in Muscovy ducks farming due to the contrasting effect over the weight gain and FCR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理和添加益生菌对番鸭生长性能的影响
背景:番鸭(Cairina moschata)养殖是发达国家家禽业的重要组成部分。然而,缺乏研究和改进计划导致发展中地区的生产结果不佳,在这些地区,这种鸭品种对获得足够的粮食安全至关重要。目的:评价改善管理条件和使用商业益生菌对哥伦比亚半集约化系统农场番鸭生长性能的影响。方法:采用后院管理、改进管理和改进管理加添加益生菌3种处理,记录鸭的增重和饲料系数(FCR)。结果:后院养殖系统导致体重增加不佳(雄性=2,797 g;女性=1,605 g)和效率较低的FCR(4.06)。管理条件的改善改善了猪的饲料比(3.1)(p<0.05)和增重(p<0.05)(公鸭=2,888 g;母鸭= 1637 g)。改良管理下的鸭的FCR与发达鸭养殖业相当,但最终体重明显低于选定品系。使用商业益生菌导致体重增加显著(p<0.05)改善(雄性=2,930 g;女= 1692克);然而,它也增加了FCR (3.5;p < 0.05)。结论:管理条件的改善提高了番鸭的生产力,但在哥伦比亚等发展中国家需要进一步的遗传选择过程或选种的使用。由于益生菌对增重和饲料效率的对比效应,需要进一步的研究来评估补充益生菌是否能改善番鸭养殖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Pecuarias
Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Pecuarias AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias (RCCP) welcome the submission of original manuscripts on experimental and clinical studies associated with the broad areas of animal sciences and veterinary medicine as they interface with biochemistry, molecular biology, physiology, pharmacology, toxicology, pathology, microbiology, parasitology, immunology and epidemiology. The scope of the journal includes studies of basic and applied research in animal management and production, feeding and nutrition, reproduction, breeding, genetics, animal welfare and behavior; as well as animal production focussed from biotechnology, soil science, agrostology, silvopastoral systems, livestock economics and the environment. The criteria for acceptance of papers submitted for publication are originality, quality and clarity of the content. Each contribution must be based on original, unpublished research that has not been simultaneously submitted to other journals. All papers will be peer reviewed. All authors bear responsibility for ensuring the integrity and quality of their reported research. It is the author''s responsibility to secure permission to use figures or tables that have been published elsewhere. Contributions may be classified as original research, review, rapid communication, clinical case studies or methodological articles, as well as news/commentaries or letters to the editor. Most review articles are invited by the editor. Authors interested in submitting a review article should contact the corresponding editor. Rapid publication of original manuscripts is a goal of the journal. Manuscripts must be written in English. Each manuscript is considered for publication with the understanding that it has not been simultaneously submitted to any other journal. Upon acceptance for publication, papers are subject to editorial review and revision.
期刊最新文献
Physicochemical characterization of milk of 5/8 Holstein x 3/8 Zebu crossbred cows in the tropical region of Mexico Effects of non-genetic factors on milk yield and chemical composition of milk from Holstein-Friesian cows Eficacia de fármacos antihelmínticos para el control de Fasciola hepatica en ganado lechero en Perú Leg health and growth performance of broiler chickens fed grape seed extract Characterization and antimicrobial resistance of Moraxella ovis isolates from clinical cases of contagious ovine keratoconjunctivitis in Mexico State, Mexico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1