Color Correction: How the Racial Reckoning Exposed Systemic Racism in Journalism

Bradd K. Clark
{"title":"Color Correction: How the Racial Reckoning Exposed Systemic Racism in Journalism","authors":"Bradd K. Clark","doi":"10.18848/2328-6261/cgp/v22i02/1-20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper captures the current critical moment in journalism’s history, in which racialized and Indigenous journalists are forcing an unprecedented “reckoning” of the systemic racism enshrined in the ethical canon and normative structure of the fourth estate. It comes as the police killing of George Floyd has triggered a global Black Lives Matter movement demanding justice for people of color;when the COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately ravaged Black, Latino, and Indigenous communities;at a time of profound distrust of mainstream news media;and in an era when news organizations stare down the additional crisis of economic sustainability exacerbated by the pandemic. Racialized journalists have called out their own employers and industry for news content that lacks context, plays to stereotypes, and all too often fails to grasp the lived experiences of non-white people in society. They have pointed out the hypocrisy of journalism’s central ethics—objectivity, balance, public service—that have always privileged white voices over other perspectives. They describe a work environment that fails to take into account their value as journalists, and their insights as First Peoples, or people of color. These are the findings of a content analysis of the op-eds, columns, social media posts, podcasts, and other published media accounts by Indigenous and racialized journalists in the United States and Canada in the six months following George Floyd’s death. This study takes their experiences, concerns, and calls for reform and puts them in the context of previous research on diversity and inclusion in journalism, demonstrating how journalistic practice and ethics are deeply entrenched in white dominance.","PeriodicalId":38263,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Organizational Diversity","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Organizational Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/2328-6261/cgp/v22i02/1-20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper captures the current critical moment in journalism’s history, in which racialized and Indigenous journalists are forcing an unprecedented “reckoning” of the systemic racism enshrined in the ethical canon and normative structure of the fourth estate. It comes as the police killing of George Floyd has triggered a global Black Lives Matter movement demanding justice for people of color;when the COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately ravaged Black, Latino, and Indigenous communities;at a time of profound distrust of mainstream news media;and in an era when news organizations stare down the additional crisis of economic sustainability exacerbated by the pandemic. Racialized journalists have called out their own employers and industry for news content that lacks context, plays to stereotypes, and all too often fails to grasp the lived experiences of non-white people in society. They have pointed out the hypocrisy of journalism’s central ethics—objectivity, balance, public service—that have always privileged white voices over other perspectives. They describe a work environment that fails to take into account their value as journalists, and their insights as First Peoples, or people of color. These are the findings of a content analysis of the op-eds, columns, social media posts, podcasts, and other published media accounts by Indigenous and racialized journalists in the United States and Canada in the six months following George Floyd’s death. This study takes their experiences, concerns, and calls for reform and puts them in the context of previous research on diversity and inclusion in journalism, demonstrating how journalistic practice and ethics are deeply entrenched in white dominance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
色彩校正:种族清算如何揭露新闻中的系统性种族主义
本文抓住了当前新闻业历史上的关键时刻,在这个时刻,种族化和土著记者正在迫使人们对第四阶层的道德规范和规范结构中所体现的系统性种族主义进行前所未有的“清算”。目前,警察杀害乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)引发了一场要求为有色人种伸张正义的全球“黑人的命也重要”(Black Lives Matter)运动;2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对黑人、拉丁裔和土著社区造成了不成比例的破坏;人们对主流新闻媒体产生了深刻的不信任;被种族化的记者指责自己的雇主和行业的新闻内容缺乏背景,迎合刻板印象,而且往往无法把握社会中非白人的生活经历。他们指出,新闻业的核心道德准则——客观、平衡、公共服务——是虚伪的,这些准则总是让白人的声音凌驾于其他观点之上。他们描述的工作环境没有考虑到他们作为记者的价值,以及他们作为第一民族或有色人种的见解。这些是对乔治·弗洛伊德去世后六个月内美国和加拿大土著和种族化记者的专栏、专栏、社交媒体帖子、播客和其他发表的媒体报道进行内容分析的结果。这项研究将他们的经验、担忧和改革呼吁放在之前关于新闻业多样性和包容性的研究背景下,展示了新闻实践和道德是如何在白人统治下根深蒂固的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Organizational Diversity
International Journal of Organizational Diversity Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Labor Inclusion with a Gender Perspective in Complex Environments: Firm Steps for the Post-Pandemic Economic Recovery Relationship between Sexual Orientation/Gender Identity Policies and Job Satisfaction in Public Accounting Firms An Assessment of the Impact of Egalitarianism on Work-Family Relationships Redrawing the Canvas of Migration Decisions: A Case Study of Cambodian Workers in Thailand Analysis of Cultural Diversity Concept in Different Countries Using Fractal Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1