TAKING DISABILITY SERIOUSLY ON THE FEMINIST DISABILITY STUDIES CRITIC TO THE MAINSTREAM FEMINISM

M. Bernardini
{"title":"TAKING DISABILITY SERIOUSLY ON THE FEMINIST DISABILITY STUDIES CRITIC TO THE MAINSTREAM FEMINISM","authors":"M. Bernardini","doi":"10.18351/2179-7137/ged.2015n2p148-164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The discipline of Feminist Disability Studies (FDS) emerges in the mid-Eighties as a critique of both Feminist and Disability Studies, considered “guilty” of excluding women with disabilities from their theorization and, therefore, incapable to represent them as subjects. After a brief analysis of the similarities and the differences between the conditions of oppression experienced by people with disabilities and women, in this paper I first analyse some of the reasons that may be present behind the silence of Feminism on disability, then I show the importance of FDS for the feminist inquiry. Finally, I conclude by focusing on a recent and interesting point of convergence between Feminism and FDS, namely, the theme of vulnerability and dependency","PeriodicalId":42602,"journal":{"name":"Revista Genero & Direito","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Genero & Direito","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18351/2179-7137/ged.2015n2p148-164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The discipline of Feminist Disability Studies (FDS) emerges in the mid-Eighties as a critique of both Feminist and Disability Studies, considered “guilty” of excluding women with disabilities from their theorization and, therefore, incapable to represent them as subjects. After a brief analysis of the similarities and the differences between the conditions of oppression experienced by people with disabilities and women, in this paper I first analyse some of the reasons that may be present behind the silence of Feminism on disability, then I show the importance of FDS for the feminist inquiry. Finally, I conclude by focusing on a recent and interesting point of convergence between Feminism and FDS, namely, the theme of vulnerability and dependency
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重视残疾的女性主义残疾研究对主流女性主义的批判
女权主义残疾研究(FDS)作为对女权主义和残疾研究的批判出现于80年代中期,被认为“有罪”地将残疾妇女排除在他们的理论之外,因此无法将她们作为主体来表现。在简要分析了残障人士与女性所受压迫状况的异同之后,本文首先分析了女性主义在残障问题上的沉默背后可能存在的一些原因,然后展示了FDS对于女性主义探究的重要性。最后,我把重点放在女权主义和FDS之间最近一个有趣的交汇点上,即脆弱性和依赖性的主题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Genero & Direito
Revista Genero & Direito SOCIAL ISSUES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Il soggetto vulnerabile e lo Stato responsabile INTRODUCTION:THE VULNERABILITY CHALLENGE VULNERABILITY AND THE (DISABILITY) LAW: STATUS, CHALLENGES AND PROMISES OF A CONTROVERSIAL CATEGORY INSEGUROS Y LIBRES: VULNERABILIDAD Y RESILENCIA EN EL LÉXICO POLÍTICO-JURÍDICO DEL NEOLIBERALISMO LA VULNERABILITE ENTRE HUMANISME ET POST-HUMANISME ANTI-SPECISTE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1