Intercultural Feminist Practices in Italy: Challenging Stereotyped and Othering Images of Migrant Women

Erika Bernacchi
{"title":"Intercultural Feminist Practices in Italy: Challenging Stereotyped and Othering Images of Migrant Women","authors":"Erika Bernacchi","doi":"10.18351/2179-7137/ged.2015n2p165-182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feminist postcolonial authors criticised the tendency of mainstream western feminism to represent 'third world' women as necessarily less emancipated than western women and to describe their cultural practices in an othering way, without holding their own culture up to the same scrutiny. From this idea stems a paternalistic and patronising attitude that locates western women in a “position to liberate their less fortunate sisters, especially those in the 'Third World'”. (hooks, 2000: 45). In light of these reflections, this article investigates to what extent selected women’s intercultural associations in Italy have been able to counter dominant discourses that see migrant women as necessarily needy and deprived or as a sign of cultural difference. The research confronts the associations' mission statements with the practices and relationships that emerged from the interviews. It focuses first on power sharing within the associations and the relevance of patronizing attitudes on the part of Italian-born women. Secondly the article explores how associations addressed the notion of cultural difference by focusing on the specific issues of Islamic veiling practices and female genital mutilations. Finally it investigates the possible value of cross-cultural comparisons on practices detrimental to women in the promotion of intercultural feminist practices.","PeriodicalId":42602,"journal":{"name":"Revista Genero & Direito","volume":"4 1","pages":"165-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Genero & Direito","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18351/2179-7137/ged.2015n2p165-182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Feminist postcolonial authors criticised the tendency of mainstream western feminism to represent 'third world' women as necessarily less emancipated than western women and to describe their cultural practices in an othering way, without holding their own culture up to the same scrutiny. From this idea stems a paternalistic and patronising attitude that locates western women in a “position to liberate their less fortunate sisters, especially those in the 'Third World'”. (hooks, 2000: 45). In light of these reflections, this article investigates to what extent selected women’s intercultural associations in Italy have been able to counter dominant discourses that see migrant women as necessarily needy and deprived or as a sign of cultural difference. The research confronts the associations' mission statements with the practices and relationships that emerged from the interviews. It focuses first on power sharing within the associations and the relevance of patronizing attitudes on the part of Italian-born women. Secondly the article explores how associations addressed the notion of cultural difference by focusing on the specific issues of Islamic veiling practices and female genital mutilations. Finally it investigates the possible value of cross-cultural comparisons on practices detrimental to women in the promotion of intercultural feminist practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利的跨文化女权主义实践:挑战移民妇女的刻板印象和其他形象
后殖民时期的女权主义作家批评西方主流女权主义倾向于将“第三世界”女性描绘成必然比西方女性更不自由的女性,并以另一种方式描述她们的文化习俗,而没有将自己的文化置于同样的审视之下。这种观念产生了一种家长式和居高临下的态度,将西方女性置于“解放她们不幸的姐妹,尤其是那些‘第三世界’的姐妹的地位”。(胡克斯,2000:45)。鉴于这些反思,本文调查了意大利选定的妇女跨文化协会在多大程度上能够对抗将移民妇女视为必然贫困和被剥夺或作为文化差异标志的主流话语。该研究将协会的使命宣言与访谈中出现的实践和关系进行了对比。它首先侧重于协会内部的权力分享以及意大利出生的妇女的光顾态度的相关性。其次,文章探讨了协会如何通过关注伊斯兰面纱习俗和女性生殖器切割的具体问题来解决文化差异的概念。最后,本文探讨了跨文化比较对女性不利的做法在促进跨文化女权主义实践中的可能价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Genero & Direito
Revista Genero & Direito SOCIAL ISSUES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Il soggetto vulnerabile e lo Stato responsabile INTRODUCTION:THE VULNERABILITY CHALLENGE VULNERABILITY AND THE (DISABILITY) LAW: STATUS, CHALLENGES AND PROMISES OF A CONTROVERSIAL CATEGORY INSEGUROS Y LIBRES: VULNERABILIDAD Y RESILENCIA EN EL LÉXICO POLÍTICO-JURÍDICO DEL NEOLIBERALISMO LA VULNERABILITE ENTRE HUMANISME ET POST-HUMANISME ANTI-SPECISTE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1