Identification of cognitive and metacognitive strategies in school pedagogues: results of a training program

Q4 Social Sciences Educacao e Pesquisa Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/s1678-4634202349248484en
Henrique Costa Brojato, Evelise Maria Labatut Portilho
{"title":"Identification of cognitive and metacognitive strategies in school pedagogues: results of a training program","authors":"Henrique Costa Brojato, Evelise Maria Labatut Portilho","doi":"10.1590/s1678-4634202349248484en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article aims to identify the cognitive and metacognitive strategies utilized by school pedagogues responsible for the coordination and articulation of the pedagogic process inside schools in a continuous training program. Metacognition is not usually examined in connection with teachers and/or professional development; therefore, to analyze the importance of metacognitive development for school pedagogues, attention to continuous training is essential both to attain a better comprehension of the term and to establish ways to identify it. This qualitative research taking a phenomenological and hermeneutic approach was developed based on a continuous training program with 16 pedagogues from public and private schools and different segments of activity. Semi-structured interviews and an instrument for the identification of the utilization of five cognitive strategies (reflexivity, reality conscious, verbalization, attention and thought/attitude) and three metacognitive (awareness-making, self-control and autopoiesis) were administered. The results indicate a high level of agreement by participants with the items described by the instrument; in addition, when relating verbal reports from participants to the results obtained with the instrument, it was noted that the proposed continuous training program could facilitate reflections about “learn to learn” as articulated within the activity context. Further studies are needed of school pedagogues, as well the development of training processes (both initial and continued) that promote the development of metacognitive strategies, contributing to daily activity together with the teachers.","PeriodicalId":35419,"journal":{"name":"Educacao e Pesquisa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacao e Pesquisa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-4634202349248484en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article aims to identify the cognitive and metacognitive strategies utilized by school pedagogues responsible for the coordination and articulation of the pedagogic process inside schools in a continuous training program. Metacognition is not usually examined in connection with teachers and/or professional development; therefore, to analyze the importance of metacognitive development for school pedagogues, attention to continuous training is essential both to attain a better comprehension of the term and to establish ways to identify it. This qualitative research taking a phenomenological and hermeneutic approach was developed based on a continuous training program with 16 pedagogues from public and private schools and different segments of activity. Semi-structured interviews and an instrument for the identification of the utilization of five cognitive strategies (reflexivity, reality conscious, verbalization, attention and thought/attitude) and three metacognitive (awareness-making, self-control and autopoiesis) were administered. The results indicate a high level of agreement by participants with the items described by the instrument; in addition, when relating verbal reports from participants to the results obtained with the instrument, it was noted that the proposed continuous training program could facilitate reflections about “learn to learn” as articulated within the activity context. Further studies are needed of school pedagogues, as well the development of training processes (both initial and continued) that promote the development of metacognitive strategies, contributing to daily activity together with the teachers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学校教师认知和元认知策略的识别:一个培训项目的结果
摘要本文旨在确定学校教师在学校持续培训计划中负责协调和表达教学过程所使用的认知和元认知策略。元认知通常不与教师和/或专业发展有关;因此,为了分析元认知发展对学校教师的重要性,重视持续的培训对于更好地理解这个术语和建立识别它的方法都是必不可少的。这项采用现象学和解释学方法的定性研究是基于对来自公立和私立学校以及不同活动部门的16名教师的持续培训计划而开发的。采用半结构化访谈和一种工具来识别五种认知策略(反身性、现实意识、语言化、注意力和思想/态度)和三种元认知策略(意识形成、自我控制和自我创生)的使用情况。结果表明,参与者与该工具所描述的项目高度一致;此外,在将参与者的口头报告与使用该工具获得的结果联系起来时,有人指出,拟议的持续培训方案可以促进对活动范围内所阐述的“学会学习”的思考。需要对学校教师进行进一步的研究,以及开发促进元认知策略发展的培训过程(包括初始的和持续的),这些过程有助于与教师一起进行日常活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educacao e Pesquisa
Educacao e Pesquisa Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: EDUCAÇÃO E PESQUISA é uma publicação quadrimestral da Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de São Paulo – FEUSP. Publicada desde 1975, a revista aceita artigos em português, francês, espanhol e inglês. Publica artigos inéditos na área de educação, em especial resultados de pesquisa de caráter teórico ou empírico, revisões da literatura de pesquisa educacional e reflexões críticas sobre experiências pedagógicas.
期刊最新文献
Os bebês na sala do berçário: diferentes trajetórias no espaço Análisis de la competencia digital de futuros profesionales de la educación en tiempos de pandemia Educação física no ensino médio daEducação de Jovens e Adultos: (im) possibilidades pedagógicas sobre o corpo El sueño de la crítica produce monstruos: Educación en disputa, entre libertad y barbarie Perspectiva de género en actitudes hacia la probabilidad y su enseñanza en futuro profesorado chileno
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1