Postoperative atrial fibrillation is associated with increased resource utilization after cardiac surgery: a regional analysis of the Southeastern United States

R. Hawkins, Raymond J. Strobel, M. Joseph, M. Quader, N. Teman, G. Almassi, J. Mehaffey
{"title":"Postoperative atrial fibrillation is associated with increased resource utilization after cardiac surgery: a regional analysis of the Southeastern United States","authors":"R. Hawkins, Raymond J. Strobel, M. Joseph, M. Quader, N. Teman, G. Almassi, J. Mehaffey","doi":"10.20517/2574-1209.2021.116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a known risk factor for morbidity and mortality following cardiac surgery though contemporary resource utilization data is limited. We hypothesize that POAF increases the length of stay, hospital cost, and discharges to facilities, though this trend may be tempering over time. Methods: Records were extracted for all patients in a regional database who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, or both (2012-2020). Patients without a history of atrial fibrillation were stratified by POAF for univariate analysis. Patients were propensity-score matched to account for baseline, operative, and postoperative differences. Results: Of the 27,307 cardiac surgery patients, 23% developed POAF. Matching resulted in 5926 well-balanced pairs of patients with and without POAF. Every metric of resource utilization was higher for patients with POAF, including ICU length of stay (58 h vs. 49 h, P < 0.0001), postoperative length of stay (7 days vs. 5 days, P < 0.0001), discharge to a facility (27% vs. 23%, P < 0.0001), and readmission (11% vs. 8%). The mean additional total hospital cost attributable to POAF was $6705 by paired analysis. A sensitivity analysis of only patients without major complications demonstrated similarly increased resource utilization for patients with POAF. Conclusions: POAF was associated with an increased 9 additional ICU hours, 2 postoperative days, 18% more discharges to a facility, and 33% greater readmissions. An additional $6705 is associated with POAF. These conservative estimates demonstrate the broad impact of POAF on in and out of hospital resource utilization that warrants future efforts at containment and quality improvement.","PeriodicalId":75299,"journal":{"name":"Vessel plus","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vessel plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2021.116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a known risk factor for morbidity and mortality following cardiac surgery though contemporary resource utilization data is limited. We hypothesize that POAF increases the length of stay, hospital cost, and discharges to facilities, though this trend may be tempering over time. Methods: Records were extracted for all patients in a regional database who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, or both (2012-2020). Patients without a history of atrial fibrillation were stratified by POAF for univariate analysis. Patients were propensity-score matched to account for baseline, operative, and postoperative differences. Results: Of the 27,307 cardiac surgery patients, 23% developed POAF. Matching resulted in 5926 well-balanced pairs of patients with and without POAF. Every metric of resource utilization was higher for patients with POAF, including ICU length of stay (58 h vs. 49 h, P < 0.0001), postoperative length of stay (7 days vs. 5 days, P < 0.0001), discharge to a facility (27% vs. 23%, P < 0.0001), and readmission (11% vs. 8%). The mean additional total hospital cost attributable to POAF was $6705 by paired analysis. A sensitivity analysis of only patients without major complications demonstrated similarly increased resource utilization for patients with POAF. Conclusions: POAF was associated with an increased 9 additional ICU hours, 2 postoperative days, 18% more discharges to a facility, and 33% greater readmissions. An additional $6705 is associated with POAF. These conservative estimates demonstrate the broad impact of POAF on in and out of hospital resource utilization that warrants future efforts at containment and quality improvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术后心房颤动与心脏手术后资源利用率增加有关:美国东南部地区分析
目的:术后心房颤动(POAF)是心脏手术后发病率和死亡率的已知危险因素,但目前的资源利用数据有限。我们假设POAF增加了住院时间、医院费用和出院时间,尽管这种趋势可能随着时间的推移而缓和。方法:提取区域数据库中所有接受冠状动脉旁路移植术、主动脉瓣置换术或两者兼有的患者的记录(2012-2020)。无房颤病史的患者采用POAF分层进行单因素分析。患者倾向评分匹配,以说明基线、手术和术后差异。结果:27,307例心脏手术患者中,23%发生POAF。配对结果为5926对有或无POAF的均衡患者。POAF患者的每项资源利用指标都更高,包括ICU住院时间(58小时对49小时,P < 0.0001)、术后住院时间(7天对5天,P < 0.0001)、出院时间(27%对23%,P < 0.0001)和再入院时间(11%对8%)。通过配对分析,可归因于POAF的平均额外总医院费用为6705美元。一项仅针对无重大并发症患者的敏感性分析显示,POAF患者的资源利用率也同样增加。结论:POAF与额外的9个ICU小时、术后2天、18%的出院率和33%的再入院率相关。额外的6705美元与POAF有关。这些保守的估计表明,POAF对医院内外资源利用的广泛影响,值得未来努力遏制和提高质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Echocardiographic cardiac views classification using whale optimization and weighted support vector machine Association of inflammation, oxidative stress, and deteriorated cognitive functions in patients after cardiac surgery Role of inflammation in the progression of diabetic kidney disease Multivessel disease in patient with acute myocardial infarction: current treatment strategies and future perspectives Editorial review: guidance for future atrial fibrillation research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1