Survival and clinical outcomes of diabetic peripheral artery disease patients following a pain-free home-based walking program

N. Lamberti, E. Tsolaki, F. Guerzoni, N. Napoli, L. Traina, Giovanni Piva, V. Gasbarro, P. Zamboni, S. Straudi, R. Manfredini, F. Manfredini
{"title":"Survival and clinical outcomes of diabetic peripheral artery disease patients following a pain-free home-based walking program","authors":"N. Lamberti, E. Tsolaki, F. Guerzoni, N. Napoli, L. Traina, Giovanni Piva, V. Gasbarro, P. Zamboni, S. Straudi, R. Manfredini, F. Manfredini","doi":"10.20517/2574-1209.2021.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: We retrospectively examined the impact on the rate of survival of pain-free home-based exercise in diabetic peripheral artery disease patients compared to patients receiving usual care. Methods: In total, 202 patients at Fontaine’s Stage II with diabetes were studied. Half were enrolled in a structured home-based exercise program (E), whereas the other half received walking advice as the active control group (C). Long-term clinical outcomes at five years were gathered from the Emilia-Romagna Health Service Registry, with survival probability selected as the primary outcome. Results: At baseline, the two groups did not differ for any demographic or clinical characteristics. High adherence to the program was recorded in Group E (88% of home-walking sessions executed, with an average distance walked during the program of 174 km). After five years, a survival rate of 90% for Group E and 60% for Group C was observed, with a significantly (P < 0.001) higher mortality risk for Group C [Hazard ratio (HR) = 3.92]. Additionally, among secondary outcomes, Group E showed a significantly (P = 0.048) lower rate of peripheral revascularizations than Group C (15% vs. 24%, respectively; HR = 1.91), all-cause hospitalizations (P = 0.007; 61% vs. 80%, HR = 1.58), and amputations (P = 0.049; 6% vs. 13%, HR = 2.47). In a Cox multivariate-proportional regression model of the entire population, the predictors of survival probability were age (HR = 1.05), Charlson index (HR = 1.24), lower ankle-brachial index (HR = 6.66), and control group (HR = 4.99). Conclusion: A simple sustainable program aimed at improving mobility of diabetic patients with claudication at high cardiovascular risk was associated with better survival and long-term clinical outcomes.","PeriodicalId":75299,"journal":{"name":"Vessel plus","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vessel plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2021.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim: We retrospectively examined the impact on the rate of survival of pain-free home-based exercise in diabetic peripheral artery disease patients compared to patients receiving usual care. Methods: In total, 202 patients at Fontaine’s Stage II with diabetes were studied. Half were enrolled in a structured home-based exercise program (E), whereas the other half received walking advice as the active control group (C). Long-term clinical outcomes at five years were gathered from the Emilia-Romagna Health Service Registry, with survival probability selected as the primary outcome. Results: At baseline, the two groups did not differ for any demographic or clinical characteristics. High adherence to the program was recorded in Group E (88% of home-walking sessions executed, with an average distance walked during the program of 174 km). After five years, a survival rate of 90% for Group E and 60% for Group C was observed, with a significantly (P < 0.001) higher mortality risk for Group C [Hazard ratio (HR) = 3.92]. Additionally, among secondary outcomes, Group E showed a significantly (P = 0.048) lower rate of peripheral revascularizations than Group C (15% vs. 24%, respectively; HR = 1.91), all-cause hospitalizations (P = 0.007; 61% vs. 80%, HR = 1.58), and amputations (P = 0.049; 6% vs. 13%, HR = 2.47). In a Cox multivariate-proportional regression model of the entire population, the predictors of survival probability were age (HR = 1.05), Charlson index (HR = 1.24), lower ankle-brachial index (HR = 6.66), and control group (HR = 4.99). Conclusion: A simple sustainable program aimed at improving mobility of diabetic patients with claudication at high cardiovascular risk was associated with better survival and long-term clinical outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病外周动脉疾病患者在无痛家庭步行计划后的生存和临床结果
目的:我们回顾性研究了与接受常规护理的糖尿病外周动脉疾病患者相比,无痛家庭运动对生存率的影响。方法:对202例方丹氏II期糖尿病患者进行研究。其中一半参加了有组织的家庭锻炼计划(E),而另一半接受步行建议作为积极对照组(C)。5年的长期临床结果从艾米利亚-罗马涅健康服务登记处收集,生存率作为主要结果。结果:在基线时,两组在任何人口统计学或临床特征上没有差异。E组对该计划的坚持程度很高(88%的家庭步行会议执行,在计划期间平均步行距离为174公里)。5年后,E组和C组的生存率分别为90%和60%,其中C组的死亡率显著高于对照组(P < 0.001)[危险比(HR) = 3.92]。此外,在次要结局中,E组外周血运重建率显著(P = 0.048)低于C组(分别为15%对24%;HR = 1.91),全因住院率(P = 0.007;61%对80%,HR = 1.58),截肢(P = 0.049;6%对13%,HR = 2.47)。在全人群Cox多变量比例回归模型中,预测生存率的因素为年龄(HR = 1.05)、Charlson指数(HR = 1.24)、下踝肱指数(HR = 6.66)和对照组(HR = 4.99)。结论:一个简单的可持续的项目,旨在改善糖尿病合并跛行患者的高心血管风险的活动能力,与更好的生存和长期临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Echocardiographic cardiac views classification using whale optimization and weighted support vector machine Association of inflammation, oxidative stress, and deteriorated cognitive functions in patients after cardiac surgery Role of inflammation in the progression of diabetic kidney disease Multivessel disease in patient with acute myocardial infarction: current treatment strategies and future perspectives Editorial review: guidance for future atrial fibrillation research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1