Predictors and risk-adjusted outcomes of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation in repeat surgical and valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Julia Dokko
{"title":"Predictors and risk-adjusted outcomes of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation in repeat surgical and valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement","authors":"Julia Dokko","doi":"10.20517/2574-1209.2022.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation/flutter (POAF/AFL) complications have not been well studied for repeat aortic valve replacements (r-AVR); this study identified risk factors predisposing to POAF/AFL and POAF/AFL’s effect upon risk-adjusted outcomes. Methods: Using New York State’s Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System records (2005-2018), multivariable forward selection models identified risks predictive of POAF/AFL. To identify POAF/AFL’s impact upon risk-adjusted mortality/morbidity (MM) and 30-day readmission (READMIT), forward selection logistic regression models applied Firth bias correction to address data sparsity. Results: Of the 242 r-AVR patients, 147 underwent repeat surgical aortic valve replacements (r-SAVR) and 95 underwent valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacements (ViV-TAVR); 39.46% of r-SAVR and 43.16% of ViV-TAVR patients had POAF/AFL. R-SAVR patients with POAF/AFL were older (69.7 ± 11.1 vs. 56.7 ± 13.2 years, P < 0.01) compared to R-SAVR patients without POAF/AFL. Multivariable models identified an enhanced POAF/AFL risk for elderly (OR: 1.05, 95%CI: 1.03-1.07, P < 0.01) and cerebral vascular disease (OR: 2.18, 95%CI: 1.05-4.55, P = 0.04) patients. Bivariately, POAF/AFL was associated with READMIT, but not MM. Correspondingly, multivariable models found POAF/AFL increased READMIT (OR: 3.12, 95%CI: 1.46-6.65, P < 0.01), but not MM. However, black race (OR: 4.97, 95%CI: 1.61-15.37, P < 0.01) and Elixhauser score (OR: 1.05, 95%CI: 1.02-1.08, P < 0.01) increased risk for MM. Conclusion: More common in older and cerebrovascular disease patients, 41% of r-AVR patients with POAF/AFL had increased READMIT risk; thus, future investigations should focus on improving POAF/AF r-AVR patients’ post-discharge continuity of care.","PeriodicalId":75299,"journal":{"name":"Vessel plus","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vessel plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2022.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation/flutter (POAF/AFL) complications have not been well studied for repeat aortic valve replacements (r-AVR); this study identified risk factors predisposing to POAF/AFL and POAF/AFL’s effect upon risk-adjusted outcomes. Methods: Using New York State’s Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System records (2005-2018), multivariable forward selection models identified risks predictive of POAF/AFL. To identify POAF/AFL’s impact upon risk-adjusted mortality/morbidity (MM) and 30-day readmission (READMIT), forward selection logistic regression models applied Firth bias correction to address data sparsity. Results: Of the 242 r-AVR patients, 147 underwent repeat surgical aortic valve replacements (r-SAVR) and 95 underwent valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacements (ViV-TAVR); 39.46% of r-SAVR and 43.16% of ViV-TAVR patients had POAF/AFL. R-SAVR patients with POAF/AFL were older (69.7 ± 11.1 vs. 56.7 ± 13.2 years, P < 0.01) compared to R-SAVR patients without POAF/AFL. Multivariable models identified an enhanced POAF/AFL risk for elderly (OR: 1.05, 95%CI: 1.03-1.07, P < 0.01) and cerebral vascular disease (OR: 2.18, 95%CI: 1.05-4.55, P = 0.04) patients. Bivariately, POAF/AFL was associated with READMIT, but not MM. Correspondingly, multivariable models found POAF/AFL increased READMIT (OR: 3.12, 95%CI: 1.46-6.65, P < 0.01), but not MM. However, black race (OR: 4.97, 95%CI: 1.61-15.37, P < 0.01) and Elixhauser score (OR: 1.05, 95%CI: 1.02-1.08, P < 0.01) increased risk for MM. Conclusion: More common in older and cerebrovascular disease patients, 41% of r-AVR patients with POAF/AFL had increased READMIT risk; thus, future investigations should focus on improving POAF/AF r-AVR patients’ post-discharge continuity of care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重复手术和经导管瓣内主动脉瓣置换术中新发术后心房颤动的预测因素和风险调整结果
目的:重复主动脉瓣置换术(r-AVR)术后新发心房颤动/扑动(POAF/AFL)并发症尚未得到很好的研究;本研究确定了诱发POAF/AFL的危险因素以及POAF/AFL对风险调整结果的影响。方法:利用纽约州全州规划与研究合作系统(2005-2018)的记录,采用多变量前向选择模型确定POAF/AFL的风险预测。为了确定POAF/AFL对风险调整死亡率/发病率(MM)和30天再入院率(READMIT)的影响,前向选择逻辑回归模型应用Firth偏倚校正来解决数据稀疏性问题。结果:242例r-AVR患者中,147例接受了重复手术主动脉瓣置换术(r-SAVR), 95例接受了经导管瓣内主动脉瓣置换术(ViV-TAVR);39.46%的r-SAVR和43.16%的ViV-TAVR患者有POAF/AFL。合并POAF/AFL的R-SAVR患者比未合并POAF/AFL的R-SAVR患者年龄大(69.7±11.1岁比56.7±13.2岁,P < 0.01)。多变量模型发现,老年(OR: 1.05, 95%CI: 1.03-1.07, P < 0.01)和脑血管疾病(OR: 2.18, 95%CI: 1.05-4.55, P = 0.04)患者的POAF/AFL风险增加。相应地,多变量模型发现,POAF/AFL与READMIT相关(OR: 3.12, 95%CI: 1.46 ~ 6.65, P < 0.01),但与MM无关。然而,黑人(OR: 4.97, 95%CI: 1.61 ~ 15.37, P < 0.01)和Elixhauser评分(OR: 1.05, 95%CI: 1.02 ~ 1.08, P < 0.01)增加了MM的风险。结论:在老年和脑血管疾病患者中更常见,41%的r-AVR患者合并POAF/AFL增加了READMIT风险;因此,未来的研究应侧重于改善POAF/AF - avr患者出院后护理的连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Echocardiographic cardiac views classification using whale optimization and weighted support vector machine Association of inflammation, oxidative stress, and deteriorated cognitive functions in patients after cardiac surgery Role of inflammation in the progression of diabetic kidney disease Multivessel disease in patient with acute myocardial infarction: current treatment strategies and future perspectives Editorial review: guidance for future atrial fibrillation research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1