Human exposure assessment of organophosphate esters (OPEs) through dust ingestion and dermal absorption in Colombian cities

R. Olivero-Verbel, B. Johnson-Restrepo, E. Eljarrat
{"title":"Human exposure assessment of organophosphate esters (OPEs) through dust ingestion and dermal absorption in Colombian cities","authors":"R. Olivero-Verbel, B. Johnson-Restrepo, E. Eljarrat","doi":"10.20517/jeea.2021.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concentrations of 19 organophosphate esters (OPEs) were determined in dust samples collected from house and car indoor microenvironments in three Colombian cities. ∑OPE concentrations ranged from 1.31 to 599 μg/g. Mean concentrations of dust homes were 82.6, 48.3, and 46.7 μg/g for Cartagena, Bogotá, and Medellín, respectively. The pollution inside cars was somewhat higher than in houses, with a mean value of 231 μg/g. Sixteen compounds were detected, being TPHP, DCP, TEP, and TCEP the most frequently detected. As for OPEs with higher levels in houses, we found (mean ± SD) 35.2 ± 37.1 μg/g for TDCIPP in Cartagena, 35.6 ± 80.2 μg/g for TPHP in Cartagena, 15.9 ± 31.4 μg/g for DCP in Cartagena, 35.7 ± 19.1 μg/g for TBOEP in Bogotá, 15.7 ± 14.8 μg/g for 4IPPDPP in Medellín, and 17.5 ± 22.9 μg/g for TCEP in Cartagena, while the highest OPE value found in cars was 176 ± 144 μg/g for TDCIPP. The estimated daily intake (EDI) of OPEs through dust ingestion ranged from 0.001 ng/kg bw/day for adults to 110 ng/kg bw/day for toddlers, while dermal absorption ranged from 0.02 ng/kg bw/day for adults to 42.7 ng/kg bw/day for infants. Overall, the EDIs of dust ingestion were three times greater than those of dust dermal absorption. The estimated EDIs were several orders of magnitude below the corresponding reference doses. However, the incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) for TCEP ranged from 1.1 × 10-5 for infants in Bogotá to 4.3 × 10-4 for adults in Cartagena, while ILCR for TEHP ranged from 8.8 × 10-7 for infants in Bogotá to 1.1 × 10-5 for adults in Bogotá. These estimated ILCRs were higher than the safe limit value of 1 × 10-6 and showed that these populations are exposed to moderate cancer risk.","PeriodicalId":73738,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental exposure assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental exposure assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/jeea.2021.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Concentrations of 19 organophosphate esters (OPEs) were determined in dust samples collected from house and car indoor microenvironments in three Colombian cities. ∑OPE concentrations ranged from 1.31 to 599 μg/g. Mean concentrations of dust homes were 82.6, 48.3, and 46.7 μg/g for Cartagena, Bogotá, and Medellín, respectively. The pollution inside cars was somewhat higher than in houses, with a mean value of 231 μg/g. Sixteen compounds were detected, being TPHP, DCP, TEP, and TCEP the most frequently detected. As for OPEs with higher levels in houses, we found (mean ± SD) 35.2 ± 37.1 μg/g for TDCIPP in Cartagena, 35.6 ± 80.2 μg/g for TPHP in Cartagena, 15.9 ± 31.4 μg/g for DCP in Cartagena, 35.7 ± 19.1 μg/g for TBOEP in Bogotá, 15.7 ± 14.8 μg/g for 4IPPDPP in Medellín, and 17.5 ± 22.9 μg/g for TCEP in Cartagena, while the highest OPE value found in cars was 176 ± 144 μg/g for TDCIPP. The estimated daily intake (EDI) of OPEs through dust ingestion ranged from 0.001 ng/kg bw/day for adults to 110 ng/kg bw/day for toddlers, while dermal absorption ranged from 0.02 ng/kg bw/day for adults to 42.7 ng/kg bw/day for infants. Overall, the EDIs of dust ingestion were three times greater than those of dust dermal absorption. The estimated EDIs were several orders of magnitude below the corresponding reference doses. However, the incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) for TCEP ranged from 1.1 × 10-5 for infants in Bogotá to 4.3 × 10-4 for adults in Cartagena, while ILCR for TEHP ranged from 8.8 × 10-7 for infants in Bogotá to 1.1 × 10-5 for adults in Bogotá. These estimated ILCRs were higher than the safe limit value of 1 × 10-6 and showed that these populations are exposed to moderate cancer risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哥伦比亚城市中通过灰尘摄入和皮肤吸收对有机磷酸酯(OPEs)的人体暴露评估
从哥伦比亚三个城市的房屋和汽车室内微环境收集的粉尘样本中测定了19种有机磷酸酯(OPEs)的浓度。∑OPE浓度范围为1.31 ~ 599 μg/g。卡塔赫纳、波哥大和Medellín的平均粉尘浓度分别为82.6、48.3和46.7 μg/g。车内污染程度略高于室内,平均值为231 μg/g。共检出16种化合物,其中TPHP、DCP、TEP和TCEP检出频率最高。对于室内较高的OPEs,卡塔赫纳TDCIPP为35.2±37.1 μg/g,卡塔赫纳TPHP为35.6±80.2 μg/g,卡塔赫纳DCP为15.9±31.4 μg/g,波哥大TBOEP为35.7±19.1 μg/g, Medellín 4IPPDPP为15.7±14.8 μg,卡塔赫纳TCEP为17.5±22.9 μg/g,而汽车中最高的OPEs值为176±144 μg/g。通过灰尘摄入的OPEs的估计每日摄入量(EDI)范围从成人的0.001 ng/kg bw/天到幼儿的110 ng/kg bw/天,而皮肤吸收范围从成人的0.02 ng/kg bw/天到婴儿的42.7 ng/kg bw/天。总的来说,吸入粉尘的EDIs是皮肤吸收粉尘的三倍。估计的EDIs比相应的参考剂量低几个数量级。然而,在波哥大, TCEP的增量终身癌症风险(ILCR)从婴儿的1.1 × 10-5到卡塔赫纳成人的4.3 × 10-4不等,而在波哥大, TEHP的增量终身癌症风险从婴儿的8.8 × 10-7到成人的1.1 × 10-5不等。这些估计的ilcr高于1 × 10-6的安全极限值,表明这些人群暴露于中等癌症风险中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Airborne concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in hair salons primarily serving women of color Legacy halogenated flame retardants in Canadian human milk from the maternal-infant research on environmental chemicals study Bioaccumulation, transfer, and impacts of microplastics in aquatic food chains In vitro estimation of oral bioaccessibility of brominated flame retardants in indoor dust by fasted and fed physiologically extraction test Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in powdered infant formula: potential exposures and health risks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1