Portfolio selection with marginal risk control

IF 0.8 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Computational Finance Pub Date : 2010-09-01 DOI:10.21314/JCF.2010.213
Shushang Zhu, Duan Li, Xiaoling Sun
{"title":"Portfolio selection with marginal risk control","authors":"Shushang Zhu, Duan Li, Xiaoling Sun","doi":"10.21314/JCF.2010.213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marginal risk that represents the risk contribution of an individual asset is an important criterion in portfolio selection and risk management. In the literature, however, the measure of marginal risk has been only employed in ex post analysis of a portfolio policy, and the control of marginal risk is achieved usually via position diversification that simply imposes upper bounds on the portfolio position without considering the effect of correlations of asset returns in risk diversification. We investigate in this paper a new optimal portfolio selection problem with direct (relative) marginal risk control in the mean-variance framework, accounting for the correlations of asset returns. The resulting optimization model, however, is a notorious non-convex quadratically constrained quadratic programming problem. By exploiting the special structure of the problems, we propose an efficient branch-and-bound solution method to achieve a global optimality in which convex quadratic relaxation subproblems with second-order cone constraints are formulated to generate a tight lower bound. Empirical study shows that the model with marginal risk control is a suitable analytical tool for active portfolio risk management and demonstrates several preferable features of this new model to the traditional mean-variance model in risk management. The method is tested and compared with the commercial global optimization solver BARON for portfolio optimization problems with up to hundreds of assets and tens of marginal risk constraints.","PeriodicalId":51731,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Finance","volume":"14 1","pages":"3-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21314/JCF.2010.213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Marginal risk that represents the risk contribution of an individual asset is an important criterion in portfolio selection and risk management. In the literature, however, the measure of marginal risk has been only employed in ex post analysis of a portfolio policy, and the control of marginal risk is achieved usually via position diversification that simply imposes upper bounds on the portfolio position without considering the effect of correlations of asset returns in risk diversification. We investigate in this paper a new optimal portfolio selection problem with direct (relative) marginal risk control in the mean-variance framework, accounting for the correlations of asset returns. The resulting optimization model, however, is a notorious non-convex quadratically constrained quadratic programming problem. By exploiting the special structure of the problems, we propose an efficient branch-and-bound solution method to achieve a global optimality in which convex quadratic relaxation subproblems with second-order cone constraints are formulated to generate a tight lower bound. Empirical study shows that the model with marginal risk control is a suitable analytical tool for active portfolio risk management and demonstrates several preferable features of this new model to the traditional mean-variance model in risk management. The method is tested and compared with the commercial global optimization solver BARON for portfolio optimization problems with up to hundreds of assets and tens of marginal risk constraints.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边际风险控制下的投资组合选择
边际风险代表单个资产的风险贡献,是投资组合选择和风险管理的重要标准。然而,在文献中,边际风险的度量只被用于投资组合政策的事后分析,而对边际风险的控制通常是通过头寸分散来实现的,这种分散只是给投资组合头寸设定了上界,而没有考虑风险分散中资产收益相关性的影响。本文研究了在均值-方差框架下考虑资产收益相关性的直接(相对)边际风险控制的最优投资组合问题。然而,得到的优化模型是一个臭名昭著的非凸二次约束二次规划问题。利用问题的特殊结构,提出了一种有效的分支定界解方法,该方法利用二阶锥约束的凸二次松弛子问题生成紧下界,从而达到全局最优性。实证研究表明,边际风险控制模型是一种适合于主动投资组合风险管理的分析工具,并展示了该模型在风险管理方面优于传统均值-方差模型的几个特点。对该方法进行了测试,并与商用全局优化求解器BARON进行了比较,以解决多达数百个资产和数十个边际风险约束的投资组合优化问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computational Finance is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing knowledge in the area of financial mathematics. The journal is focused on the measurement, management and analysis of financial risk, and provides detailed insight into numerical and computational techniques in the pricing, hedging and risk management of financial instruments. The journal welcomes papers dealing with innovative computational techniques in the following areas: Numerical solutions of pricing equations: finite differences, finite elements, and spectral techniques in one and multiple dimensions. Simulation approaches in pricing and risk management: advances in Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methodologies; new strategies for market factors simulation. Optimization techniques in hedging and risk management. Fundamental numerical analysis relevant to finance: effect of boundary treatments on accuracy; new discretization of time-series analysis. Developments in free-boundary problems in finance: alternative ways and numerical implications in American option pricing.
期刊最新文献
Genus Aconitum (Ranunculaceae) in the Ukrainian Carpathians and adjacent territories. Toward a unified implementation of regression Monte Carlo algorithms Neural stochastic differential equations for conditional time series generation using the Signature-Wasserstein-1 metric Robust pricing and hedging via neural stochastic differential equations Estimating risks of European option books using neural stochastic differential equation market models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1