Relational research ethics and disengagement from collaborative research projects in higher education: A conceptual analysis

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH South African Journal of Higher Education Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.20853/36-5-4805
N. Madikizela-Madiya
{"title":"Relational research ethics and disengagement from collaborative research projects in higher education: A conceptual analysis","authors":"N. Madikizela-Madiya","doi":"10.20853/36-5-4805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research collaboration is a common practice in higher education, and so is the discourse of research ethics. However, the colonial orientation of some research as well as the managerial models of higher education practices undermine the connectedness and relationality of collaborative research. In this article, I argue this point with a focus on disengagement or withdrawal of collaborators from research projects before they are completed. I argue that this practice has ethical implications at various levels, especially the level of the researched or colonised communities. Drawing from multi-disciplinary literature, I follow a conceptual analysis method, focusing on research collaboration, research ethics and disengagement. The article identifies the types and benefits of collaborative research, as well as common reasons and ethical implications of disengagement from such projects. It concludes by recommending an extension of research ethics regulations to incorporate disengagement, in consideration of the relationality of collaborative research projects. Keywords: collaborative research, disengagement, relational ethics, managerialism, higher education","PeriodicalId":44786,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Higher Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20853/36-5-4805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research collaboration is a common practice in higher education, and so is the discourse of research ethics. However, the colonial orientation of some research as well as the managerial models of higher education practices undermine the connectedness and relationality of collaborative research. In this article, I argue this point with a focus on disengagement or withdrawal of collaborators from research projects before they are completed. I argue that this practice has ethical implications at various levels, especially the level of the researched or colonised communities. Drawing from multi-disciplinary literature, I follow a conceptual analysis method, focusing on research collaboration, research ethics and disengagement. The article identifies the types and benefits of collaborative research, as well as common reasons and ethical implications of disengagement from such projects. It concludes by recommending an extension of research ethics regulations to incorporate disengagement, in consideration of the relationality of collaborative research projects. Keywords: collaborative research, disengagement, relational ethics, managerialism, higher education
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关系研究伦理与脱离高等教育合作研究项目:概念分析
研究合作是高等教育的普遍实践,研究伦理话语也是如此。然而,一些研究的殖民取向以及高等教育实践的管理模式破坏了合作研究的连通性和关联性。在这篇文章中,我将重点讨论合作者在研究项目完成之前脱离或退出研究项目的问题。我认为,这种做法在各个层面上都具有伦理意义,尤其是在被研究或被殖民的社区层面上。借鉴多学科文献,我遵循概念分析方法,重点关注研究合作,研究伦理和脱离。这篇文章确定了合作研究的类型和好处,以及从这些项目中脱离出来的常见原因和伦理含义。最后,考虑到合作研究项目之间的关系,它建议扩大研究伦理规范,将脱离纳入其中。关键词:合作研究,脱离,关系伦理,管理主义,高等教育
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Higher Education
South African Journal of Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
28.60%
发文量
38
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Decentralised systemising of Scholarship of Engagement in higher education towards societal impact Pedagogical dilemma in teacher education: Bridging the theory practice gap An auto ethnographic reflection of service learning: A higher education perspective The development, validation and standardisation of a questionnaire measuring an Auditing teaching-learning intervention at a SAICA-accredited university Active learning in an online postgraduate research module: Perceptions of accounting students and lecturers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1