Applying an integrated theoretical lens to evaluate the perceived effectiveness of a computer-based reading development course in higher education

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH South African Journal of Higher Education Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.20853/37-2-5083
B. Lenong, S. Holtzhausen
{"title":"Applying an integrated theoretical lens to evaluate the perceived effectiveness of a computer-based reading development course in higher education","authors":"B. Lenong, S. Holtzhausen","doi":"10.20853/37-2-5083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"South African higher education institutions have implemented different means of developing first-year students’ English language abilities. In 2007, a university of technology introduced a compulsory computer-based reading development course to help first-year students improve their reading ability. A decade after implementation, an investigation into the effectiveness of the course, from the students’ perspectives, became imperative. This article reports on an evaluation of the perceived effectiveness of the course that was undertaken in 2018. A questionnaire survey of 269 Bachelor of Education students, followed by focus group interviews, were used to gather data. The design of the study was informed by a theoretical lens that highlights a set of directives that are underpinned by theory on student engagement and creating motivational conditions. This theory is integrated with theory emanating from studies on technology acceptance and use of the computer as medium. The findings indicate that the course was generally perceived as easy to use, useful and engaging, and that a good level of inclusion had been established. A few aspects needed attention, however, and pointed to the institution’s obligation to ensure that all conditions are adhered to for the creation of a motivational environment for culturally diverse communities. The article not only touches upon the practical implementation of reading development in higher education, but also describes in detail an integrated theoretical lens that can be customised to evaluate the perceived effectiveness of many technologically enhanced teaching and learning applications in higher education.","PeriodicalId":44786,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Higher Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20853/37-2-5083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

South African higher education institutions have implemented different means of developing first-year students’ English language abilities. In 2007, a university of technology introduced a compulsory computer-based reading development course to help first-year students improve their reading ability. A decade after implementation, an investigation into the effectiveness of the course, from the students’ perspectives, became imperative. This article reports on an evaluation of the perceived effectiveness of the course that was undertaken in 2018. A questionnaire survey of 269 Bachelor of Education students, followed by focus group interviews, were used to gather data. The design of the study was informed by a theoretical lens that highlights a set of directives that are underpinned by theory on student engagement and creating motivational conditions. This theory is integrated with theory emanating from studies on technology acceptance and use of the computer as medium. The findings indicate that the course was generally perceived as easy to use, useful and engaging, and that a good level of inclusion had been established. A few aspects needed attention, however, and pointed to the institution’s obligation to ensure that all conditions are adhered to for the creation of a motivational environment for culturally diverse communities. The article not only touches upon the practical implementation of reading development in higher education, but also describes in detail an integrated theoretical lens that can be customised to evaluate the perceived effectiveness of many technologically enhanced teaching and learning applications in higher education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用综合理论视角评价高等教育计算机阅读发展课程的感知效果
南非的高等教育机构采用了不同的方法来培养一年级学生的英语语言能力。2007年,一所理工大学开设了一门基于计算机的阅读发展课程,帮助一年级学生提高阅读能力。实施十年后,从学生的角度对课程的有效性进行调查势在必行。本文报告了2018年对该课程的感知有效性进行的评估。采用问卷调查的方式对269名教育学学士学生进行调查,然后采用焦点小组访谈的方式收集数据。该研究的设计以理论视角为依据,强调了一套以学生参与和创造激励条件的理论为基础的指令。这一理论与来自技术接受和使用计算机作为媒介的研究的理论相结合。调查结果表明,人们普遍认为该课程易于使用、有用和引人入胜,并建立了良好的包容性。但是,有几个方面需要注意,并指出该机构有义务确保遵守所有条件,为文化多样化的社区创造一种激励的环境。本文不仅涉及阅读发展在高等教育中的实际实施,而且还详细描述了一个可以定制的综合理论视角,以评估许多技术增强的教学和学习应用在高等教育中的感知有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Higher Education
South African Journal of Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
28.60%
发文量
38
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Decentralised systemising of Scholarship of Engagement in higher education towards societal impact Pedagogical dilemma in teacher education: Bridging the theory practice gap An auto ethnographic reflection of service learning: A higher education perspective The development, validation and standardisation of a questionnaire measuring an Auditing teaching-learning intervention at a SAICA-accredited university Active learning in an online postgraduate research module: Perceptions of accounting students and lecturers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1