An innovative online plagiarism course for students at a South African university

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH South African Journal of Higher Education Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.20853/37-2-5046
S. Mahomed, I. Mackraj, C. Blewett
{"title":"An innovative online plagiarism course for students at a South African university","authors":"S. Mahomed, I. Mackraj, C. Blewett","doi":"10.20853/37-2-5046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plagiarism is a major concern across institutions of learning. We developed and implemented an innovative online course to teach students about plagiarism. This study aimed to ascertain why students plagiarise, and to determine whether the course would impact students’ knowledge and perceptions of plagiarism. This case study used a mixed-methods approach. The “Understanding Plagiarism” course was based on the principles of the Activated Classroom Teaching model that uses 5 digital-age pedagogies (Curation, Conversation, Correction, Creation, Chaos) to encourage engagement. Data was obtained from surveys administered before and after the course. 148 students accessed the course and 98 completed the surveys. The main reasons identified for committing acts of plagiarism included improved grades, laziness, and unintentional plagiarism. Students’ knowledge of plagiarism improved after completing the course (67% to 93%). The majority (83%) agreed that students who plagiarise should be disciplined, and 68 per cent agreed that they felt guilty if they copied from a friend, textbook, or the internet. This research shifts the discourse on plagiarism from policy to programme and in particular the implementation of active pedagogic approaches to online teaching. Two implications of this study are, firstly, active pedagogies need to be adopted to ensure effective learning, and secondly, plagiarism which is increasing should be programmatically, and not punitively addressed.","PeriodicalId":44786,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Higher Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20853/37-2-5046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plagiarism is a major concern across institutions of learning. We developed and implemented an innovative online course to teach students about plagiarism. This study aimed to ascertain why students plagiarise, and to determine whether the course would impact students’ knowledge and perceptions of plagiarism. This case study used a mixed-methods approach. The “Understanding Plagiarism” course was based on the principles of the Activated Classroom Teaching model that uses 5 digital-age pedagogies (Curation, Conversation, Correction, Creation, Chaos) to encourage engagement. Data was obtained from surveys administered before and after the course. 148 students accessed the course and 98 completed the surveys. The main reasons identified for committing acts of plagiarism included improved grades, laziness, and unintentional plagiarism. Students’ knowledge of plagiarism improved after completing the course (67% to 93%). The majority (83%) agreed that students who plagiarise should be disciplined, and 68 per cent agreed that they felt guilty if they copied from a friend, textbook, or the internet. This research shifts the discourse on plagiarism from policy to programme and in particular the implementation of active pedagogic approaches to online teaching. Two implications of this study are, firstly, active pedagogies need to be adopted to ensure effective learning, and secondly, plagiarism which is increasing should be programmatically, and not punitively addressed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非一所大学为学生开设的创新在线抄袭课程
抄袭是整个学习机构关注的主要问题。我们开发并实施了一门创新的在线课程,向学生传授有关抄袭的知识。本研究旨在确定学生剽窃的原因,并确定课程是否会影响学生对剽窃的认识和看法。本案例研究采用混合方法。“理解抄袭”课程基于激活课堂教学模式的原则,该模式使用5种数字时代教学法(策展、对话、纠正、创造、混乱)来鼓励参与。数据是从课程前后进行的调查中获得的。148名学生参加了课程,98名学生完成了调查。抄袭的主要原因包括提高成绩、懒惰和无意的抄袭。完成课程后,学生对抄袭的认知有所提高(67%至93%)。大多数人(83%)认为抄袭的学生应该受到惩罚,68%的人认为如果他们从朋友、课本或互联网上抄袭,他们会感到内疚。这项研究将关于剽窃的论述从政策转移到计划,特别是对在线教学实施积极的教学方法。本研究的两个含义是,首先,需要采用积极的教学法来确保有效的学习,其次,剽窃应该有计划地解决,而不是惩罚性地解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Higher Education
South African Journal of Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
28.60%
发文量
38
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Decentralised systemising of Scholarship of Engagement in higher education towards societal impact Pedagogical dilemma in teacher education: Bridging the theory practice gap An auto ethnographic reflection of service learning: A higher education perspective The development, validation and standardisation of a questionnaire measuring an Auditing teaching-learning intervention at a SAICA-accredited university Active learning in an online postgraduate research module: Perceptions of accounting students and lecturers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1