Governing Religion and Gender in Anti-Discrimination Laws in Norway and Denmark

Q2 Social Sciences Oslo Law Review Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2020-02-03
Lene Kühle, Helge Årsheim
{"title":"Governing Religion and Gender in Anti-Discrimination Laws in Norway and Denmark","authors":"Lene Kühle, Helge Årsheim","doi":"10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2020-02-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the decisions on religious and gender discrimination handed down by two quasi-judicial monitoring bodies in Denmark and Norway, mapping similarities and differences between the two bodies. While the monitoring bodies tend to arrive at similar results, their modes of reasoning and understanding of what constitutes ‘religion’ for legal purposes differ considerably. Looking in particular at the decisions on religious headgear and handshaking, the article suggests that these differences may be due to a range of different factors, from the legal framework on anti-discrimination in the two countries, to the staffing of the monitoring bodies, and the financial support available for their work.","PeriodicalId":36793,"journal":{"name":"Oslo Law Review","volume":"7 1","pages":"105-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oslo Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2020-02-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the decisions on religious and gender discrimination handed down by two quasi-judicial monitoring bodies in Denmark and Norway, mapping similarities and differences between the two bodies. While the monitoring bodies tend to arrive at similar results, their modes of reasoning and understanding of what constitutes ‘religion’ for legal purposes differ considerably. Looking in particular at the decisions on religious headgear and handshaking, the article suggests that these differences may be due to a range of different factors, from the legal framework on anti-discrimination in the two countries, to the staffing of the monitoring bodies, and the financial support available for their work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挪威和丹麦反歧视法中关于宗教和性别的规定
本文审查了丹麦和挪威两个准司法监测机构就宗教和性别歧视作出的决定,并指出了这两个机构之间的异同。虽然监测机构往往得出类似的结果,但它们的推理模式和对法律目的的“宗教”构成的理解有很大不同。文章特别关注了关于宗教头巾和握手的决定,认为这些差异可能是由一系列不同因素造成的,从两国反歧视的法律框架,到监测机构的人员配备,以及为其工作提供的财政支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oslo Law Review
Oslo Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Norwayʼs New Transparency Act: An Overview in Light of International Trends A Sky Full of Stars, Constellations, Satellites and More!Legal Issues for a ‘Darkʼ Sky Liability for Shareholders and Directors of Limited Liability Companies, for CSR-Related Breaches Liability for Shareholders and Directors of Limited Liability Companies, for CSR-Related Breaches The Norwegian Legislation on Social Sustainability: An Overview of the Transparency Act
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1