Teaching Negotiation Ethics

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Legal Education Pub Date : 2011-01-26 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.1748710
A. Hinshaw
{"title":"Teaching Negotiation Ethics","authors":"A. Hinshaw","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1748710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The teaching of negotiation ethics is not necessarily a happy endeavor. The black letter law of negotiation ethics leaves many instructors feeling unsettled because students find the take home lesson to be that deceit, misdirection, dissembling, and lying are “ethical.” If we simply focus on the black letter law without putting negotiations in a broader context of interpersonal interactions and procedural justice, we set our students up for hard lessons once they are in practice. This article presents several methods of helping professors teach negotiation ethics with greater depth and sensitivity, focusing on approaches that are more likely to resonate with students and instructors – even those instructors who have difficulty understanding what it is about routine bargaining that some find so troubling.","PeriodicalId":39591,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Education","volume":"63 1","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Education","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1748710","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The teaching of negotiation ethics is not necessarily a happy endeavor. The black letter law of negotiation ethics leaves many instructors feeling unsettled because students find the take home lesson to be that deceit, misdirection, dissembling, and lying are “ethical.” If we simply focus on the black letter law without putting negotiations in a broader context of interpersonal interactions and procedural justice, we set our students up for hard lessons once they are in practice. This article presents several methods of helping professors teach negotiation ethics with greater depth and sensitivity, focusing on approaches that are more likely to resonate with students and instructors – even those instructors who have difficulty understanding what it is about routine bargaining that some find so troubling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谈判伦理教学
谈判伦理教学并非一帆风顺。谈判道德的黑字法则让许多教师感到不安,因为学生们发现,欺骗、误导、掩饰和撒谎是“道德的”。如果我们只关注黑字法律,而不把谈判放在人际交往和程序正义的更广泛背景下,我们就会让学生在实践中遇到困难。这篇文章提出了几种方法,可以帮助教授更深入、更敏感地教授谈判伦理,重点关注那些更有可能与学生和教师产生共鸣的方法——即使是那些难以理解日常谈判是什么的教师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Legal Education
Journal of Legal Education Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Journal of Legal Education (ISSN 0022-2208) is a quarterly publication of the Association of American Law Schools. The primary purpose of the Journal is to foster a rich interchange of ideas and information about legal education and related matters, including but not limited to the legal profession, legal theory, and legal scholarship. With a readership of more than 10,000 law teachers and about 500 subscribers, the Journal offers an unusually effective medium for communication to the law school world.
期刊最新文献
Cases and Places: A Field-Based Approach to Teaching Natural Resource and Environmental Law The Elite Teaching the Elite: Who Gets Hired by the Top Law Schools? A Simple Low-Cost Institutional Learning-Outcomes Assessment Process The Sharpest Tool in the Toolbox: Visual Legal Rhetoric Rescuing Pluto from the Cold: Creating an Assessment-Centered Legal Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1