The Long Tail of Legal Information - Legal Reference Service in the Age of the 'Content Farm'

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Law Library Journal Pub Date : 2011-11-01 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.1913775
L. Sims, Roberta E. Munoz
{"title":"The Long Tail of Legal Information - Legal Reference Service in the Age of the 'Content Farm'","authors":"L. Sims, Roberta E. Munoz","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1913775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to alert the legal reference librarian to a new and fundamentally different type of legal information, the \"content farm.\" This article discusses and explains the content farm phenomenon as it affects legal information aimed at the non-expert user. Those who follow trends in information dissemination may recall a recent controversy concerning a change in Google's search algorithm that was created to slow down the proliferation of content farm information. We will review and discuss the assumptions about content farm information that prompted this change; specifically the idea that information generated for content farms is somehow less worthy than other legal information on the web. To do all this we will first attempt to define the term “content farm” - a term that is evolving even as this is written. Then, we will describe how legal information is generated and disseminated via content farms. Next, we will explore why this type of information is different from the usual legal information - good and bad - that is available on the Internet. We will analyze the economic theory upon which that information is being developed: the \"long tail theory.\" We will then show and critique some examples of legal content generated by content farms that are currently available on the web. As part of that discussion we will pose the question of whether Google is right and whether content farm content should be driven from the web. We end with a review of why familiarity with this material is important to reference librarians and why, in the context of a legal reference transaction, content farm material is fundamentally different from other sources of legal information our customers may bring to us.","PeriodicalId":44477,"journal":{"name":"Law Library Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Library Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1913775","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to alert the legal reference librarian to a new and fundamentally different type of legal information, the "content farm." This article discusses and explains the content farm phenomenon as it affects legal information aimed at the non-expert user. Those who follow trends in information dissemination may recall a recent controversy concerning a change in Google's search algorithm that was created to slow down the proliferation of content farm information. We will review and discuss the assumptions about content farm information that prompted this change; specifically the idea that information generated for content farms is somehow less worthy than other legal information on the web. To do all this we will first attempt to define the term “content farm” - a term that is evolving even as this is written. Then, we will describe how legal information is generated and disseminated via content farms. Next, we will explore why this type of information is different from the usual legal information - good and bad - that is available on the Internet. We will analyze the economic theory upon which that information is being developed: the "long tail theory." We will then show and critique some examples of legal content generated by content farms that are currently available on the web. As part of that discussion we will pose the question of whether Google is right and whether content farm content should be driven from the web. We end with a review of why familiarity with this material is important to reference librarians and why, in the context of a legal reference transaction, content farm material is fundamentally different from other sources of legal information our customers may bring to us.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律信息的长尾——“内容农场”时代的法律咨询服务
本文的目的是提醒法律参考馆员注意一种新的、根本不同的法律信息类型,即“内容农场”。本文讨论并解释了内容农场现象,因为它影响了针对非专业用户的法律信息。那些关注信息传播趋势的人可能还记得最近关于b谷歌搜索算法变化的争议,该算法的创建是为了减缓内容农场信息的扩散。我们将回顾并讨论促成这一变化的内容农场信息的假设;特别是内容农场产生的信息在某种程度上不如网络上其他合法信息有价值。要做到这一切,我们将首先尝试定义术语“内容农场”——这个术语甚至在撰写本文时也在不断发展。然后,我们将描述如何通过内容农场产生和传播法律信息。接下来,我们将探讨为什么这种类型的信息不同于通常的法律信息-好的和坏的-在互联网上可用。我们将分析支撑这些信息的经济理论:“长尾理论”。然后,我们将展示和评论目前在网络上可用的内容农场生成的合法内容的一些例子。作为讨论的一部分,我们将提出谷歌是否正确以及内容农场内容是否应该从网络中驱动的问题。最后,我们回顾了为什么熟悉这些资料对参考馆员来说很重要,以及为什么在法律参考交易的背景下,内容农场的资料与客户可能带给我们的其他法律信息来源有根本的不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Law Library Journal has been the "official" publication of the Association since 1908. It is published quarterly and distributed to members directly.
期刊最新文献
Law, Artificial Intelligence, and Natural Language Processing: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to My Search Results From Stele to Silicon: Publication of Statutes, Public Access to the Law, and the Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act Beyond The Annals of Murder: The Life and Works of Thomas M. McDade On Embracing the Research Conference District Court Opinions that Remain Hidden Despite a Longstanding Congressional Mandate of Transparency – The Result of Judicial Autonomy and Systemic Indifference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1