RICHARD CAMPBELL, Rethinking Anselm’s Arguments: A Vindication of his Proof of the Existence of God, Boston, Brill, 2018

Q3 Arts and Humanities Revista Espanola de Filosofia Medieval Pub Date : 2019-07-22 DOI:10.21071/REFIME.V26I1.12156
A. Westenberg
{"title":"RICHARD CAMPBELL, Rethinking Anselm’s Arguments: A Vindication of his Proof of the Existence of God, Boston, Brill, 2018","authors":"A. Westenberg","doi":"10.21071/REFIME.V26I1.12156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since Anselm first published his 9rosfogion in in the late fi070s, two things have generally been assumed: first, that his argument for the existence of God is a form of what later became known as an ontological argument; and, second, that this argument resided in Chapter 2 of a 26-chapter work. Campbell’s latest book challenges both of these, de- monstrating with convincing force that the latter is false and the former unlikely. Consequent to this challenging of the status quo, as the book’s subtitle suggests, Campbell provides a persuasive vindication of Anselm’s arguments, to the point of declaring them a valid proof for the existence of God.","PeriodicalId":52211,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Filosofia Medieval","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Filosofia Medieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21071/REFIME.V26I1.12156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since Anselm first published his 9rosfogion in in the late fi070s, two things have generally been assumed: first, that his argument for the existence of God is a form of what later became known as an ontological argument; and, second, that this argument resided in Chapter 2 of a 26-chapter work. Campbell’s latest book challenges both of these, de- monstrating with convincing force that the latter is false and the former unlikely. Consequent to this challenging of the status quo, as the book’s subtitle suggests, Campbell provides a persuasive vindication of Anselm’s arguments, to the point of declaring them a valid proof for the existence of God.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理查德·坎贝尔,《重新思考安瑟伦的论点:证明上帝存在的证据》,波士顿,布里尔,2018年
自从安瑟伦在20世纪70年代末首次发表他的著作以来,人们普遍假设了两件事:第一,他关于上帝存在的论证是后来被称为本体论论证的一种形式;其次,这个论点出现在这本26章著作的第二章。坎贝尔的新书挑战了这两者,以令人信服的力量证明后者是错误的,前者不太可能。正如这本书的副标题所暗示的那样,随着这种对现状的挑战,坎贝尔为安瑟伦的论点提供了一个有说服力的辩护,宣称它们是上帝存在的有效证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Espanola de Filosofia Medieval
Revista Espanola de Filosofia Medieval Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Averroès (Ibn Rushd). L’intellect. Compendium du livre De l’âme. Introduction, traduction, notes et commentaires par J.-B. Brenet. Texte arabe établi et présenté par D. Wirmer. Paris: Vrin, 2022 Gwenaëlle Aubry, Luc Brisson, Philippe Hoffmann, and Laurent Lavaud. Eds. Relire les Éléments de théologie de Proclus. Réceptions, interprétations antiques et modernes. Collection Hermann Philosophie. Paris: Hermann Philosophie, 2021 Anonymus. Extractiones de Talmud per ordinem thematicum. Edited by Ulisse Cecini, Óscar de la Cruz Palma, Alexander Fidora, and Isaac Lampurlanés Farré. Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis 291A. Turnhout: Brepols, 2021 Pilar Herráiz Oliva. Dos tratados averroístas sobre la eternidad del mundo: Siger de Brabante y Boecio de Dacia. Colección Pensamiento Medieval y Renacentista 8. Pamplona: EUNSA, 2022 Christophe Grellard. La possibilità dell’errore. Pensare la tolleranza nel Medioevo. Flumen Sapientiae. Studi sul pensiero medievale 12. Roma: Aracne editrice, 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1