the nature of Goliath's visual disorder and the actual role of his personal bodyguard : ? (I Sam 17 :7,41)

V. Berginer, Chaim Cohen
{"title":"the nature of Goliath's visual disorder and the actual role of his personal bodyguard : ? (I Sam 17 :7,41)","authors":"V. Berginer, Chaim Cohen","doi":"10.2143/ANES.43.0.2018763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article should be understood in continuation of V. M. Berginer's previous article suggesting that Goliath suffered from visual field restriction as a result of acromegaly Thus the actual role of Goliath's personal bodyguard ? ? (I Sam 17:7, 41) was taken there as that of a guide for the visually impaired; and Goliath's claim to have seen David armed \"with sticks\" ? - I Sam 17:43) after the reader has just been informed that David was armed with but one stick (I Sam 17:40) was interpreted there as an indication of his impaired vision. The present more detailed article will attempt to provide much more evidence, both medical and philological (from both biblical and ancient Near Eastern sources) for all these assertions. The giant Goliath was most probably suffering from acromegaly (due to pituitary tumor) in which the main concomitant disorders are bilateral visual field constriction and in some cases diplopia (while central \"tunnel vision\" remains intact). A detailed chart has been provided listing the various possible allusions in the text ofi Sam 17 to the empirical symptoms of this disease as exhibited by Goliath (including relatively slow movement). It will further be contended that this usage of ? ? in the present context is in fact satirically euphemistic and is intended to (secondarily) heap ridicule on the blasphemous, insolent Philistine, Goliath, in the eyes of the astute reader without, however, detracting from David's heroic achievement. Finally, it will be suggested that the author is implying that it was in fact Divine intervention that truly caused David to decline King Saul's magnanimous proposal to utilize his own heavy armor and weaponry even after the king himself had outfitted David with them (i Sam 17:38-40). Given the circumstances of Goliath's medical condition as suffering from acromegaly, had the kings proposal been accepted, it would have cost David his military advantage and given Goliath (despite his visual disorder) the upper hand.","PeriodicalId":80328,"journal":{"name":"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne","volume":"43 1","pages":"27-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/ANES.43.0.2018763","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ANES.43.0.2018763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article should be understood in continuation of V. M. Berginer's previous article suggesting that Goliath suffered from visual field restriction as a result of acromegaly Thus the actual role of Goliath's personal bodyguard ? ? (I Sam 17:7, 41) was taken there as that of a guide for the visually impaired; and Goliath's claim to have seen David armed "with sticks" ? - I Sam 17:43) after the reader has just been informed that David was armed with but one stick (I Sam 17:40) was interpreted there as an indication of his impaired vision. The present more detailed article will attempt to provide much more evidence, both medical and philological (from both biblical and ancient Near Eastern sources) for all these assertions. The giant Goliath was most probably suffering from acromegaly (due to pituitary tumor) in which the main concomitant disorders are bilateral visual field constriction and in some cases diplopia (while central "tunnel vision" remains intact). A detailed chart has been provided listing the various possible allusions in the text ofi Sam 17 to the empirical symptoms of this disease as exhibited by Goliath (including relatively slow movement). It will further be contended that this usage of ? ? in the present context is in fact satirically euphemistic and is intended to (secondarily) heap ridicule on the blasphemous, insolent Philistine, Goliath, in the eyes of the astute reader without, however, detracting from David's heroic achievement. Finally, it will be suggested that the author is implying that it was in fact Divine intervention that truly caused David to decline King Saul's magnanimous proposal to utilize his own heavy armor and weaponry even after the king himself had outfitted David with them (i Sam 17:38-40). Given the circumstances of Goliath's medical condition as suffering from acromegaly, had the kings proposal been accepted, it would have cost David his military advantage and given Goliath (despite his visual disorder) the upper hand.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
歌利亚视觉障碍的本质和他私人保镖的实际作用:?(山姆上17:7,41)
这篇文章应该被理解为v.m. Berginer之前的文章的延续,该文章认为歌利亚由于肢端肥大症而受到视野限制,因此歌利亚的私人保镖的实际作用是什么?? (撒上17:7,41)是作为视障人士的指南;以及歌利亚声称看到大卫“拿着棍子”?——撒母耳记上17:43),因为读者刚刚被告知大卫只有一根棍子(撒母耳记上17:40),这被解释为他视力受损的迹象。这篇更详细的文章将试图为所有这些断言提供更多的医学和语言学证据(来自圣经和古代近东来源)。巨人歌利亚很可能患有肢端肥大症(由于垂体瘤),其主要伴随疾病是双侧视野狭窄,在某些情况下复视(而中央“隧道视力”仍然完好无损)。已经提供了一个详细的图表,列出了Sam 17的文本中可能提到的歌利亚所表现出的这种疾病的经验症状(包括相对缓慢的运动)。的用法将进一步被认为是?? 在现在的语境中,实际上是一种讽刺的委婉语,意在(其次)嘲笑亵渎神明,傲慢无礼的非利士人,歌利亚,在精明的读者眼中,然而,没有贬低大卫的英雄成就。最后,作者暗示,实际上是神的干预,真正导致大卫拒绝了扫罗王的宽宏大量的建议,即使用他自己的重型盔甲和武器,即使是在国王亲自为大卫装备之后(撒母耳记上17:38-40)。考虑到歌利亚患有肢端肥大症的医疗状况,如果国王的建议被接受,这将使大卫失去军事优势,并使歌利亚(尽管他有视觉障碍)占上风。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vegetation, Fire and Grazing Dynamics in Mtskheta, Georgia, and their Implications for Human Economic Strategies since 2000 BC The king and the land: a geography of royal power in the Biblical world The Present-Future in Amorite: A Rejoinder Herodotus 2.61.2 and the Mwdon-of caromemphitae Archaeological Investigations at Chobareti in southern Georgia, the Caucasus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1