Phosphorus sorption potential of natural adsorbent materials from a Brazil semiarid region to control eutrophication

Q2 Environmental Science Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1590/s2179-975x2621
Fernanda Monicelli, K. P. V. Cunha, F. Araújo, V. Becker
{"title":"Phosphorus sorption potential of natural adsorbent materials from a Brazil semiarid region to control eutrophication","authors":"Fernanda Monicelli, K. P. V. Cunha, F. Araújo, V. Becker","doi":"10.1590/s2179-975x2621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Aim The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) sorption of three natural P adsorbents (Luvisol, Planosol, and Scheelite tailing) from Brazil’s semiarid region. Methods The adsorption tests were done under pH 8 conditions with the natural adsorbents and Lanthanum-Modified Bentonite (LMB). The effect of humic substances on SRP sorption was also tested. For this, Luvisol and Planosol were incinerated to reduce their humic components, and new adsorption tests were done. The effect of adsorbents on water pH was also evaluated. Results The SRP sorption potential of the natural adsorbents was high at pH 8. Of the natural adsorbents, Luvisol achieved the highest maximum SRP adsorption capacity (Q) of 17.5 mg g-1, followed by Scheelite tailing (8.3 mg g-1) and Planosol (7.7 mg g-1). Scheelite tailing, Planosol and LMB increased the pH of the water. After treatment to reduce humic substances, Planosol showed a Q of 22.3 mg g-1 while Luvisol produced 11.1mg g-1. Reducing the amount of humic substances potentiated the sorption process in the Planosol. However, the isotherms of untreated Luvisol and treated Planosol have not reached equilibrium and therefore may be overestimated. Conclusions The precipitation process was probably the main sorption mechanism, being more expressive than adsorption. Scheelite tailing was the most promising material for eutrophic environments because it is alkaline, calcium-rich, and this capacity will probably remain high under anoxic conditions. It also has a small amount of organic matter and, consequently, contains less humic substances. The quality of the clay present in natural adsorbents was more important than quantity in the sorption process.","PeriodicalId":38854,"journal":{"name":"Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-975x2621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract: Aim The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) sorption of three natural P adsorbents (Luvisol, Planosol, and Scheelite tailing) from Brazil’s semiarid region. Methods The adsorption tests were done under pH 8 conditions with the natural adsorbents and Lanthanum-Modified Bentonite (LMB). The effect of humic substances on SRP sorption was also tested. For this, Luvisol and Planosol were incinerated to reduce their humic components, and new adsorption tests were done. The effect of adsorbents on water pH was also evaluated. Results The SRP sorption potential of the natural adsorbents was high at pH 8. Of the natural adsorbents, Luvisol achieved the highest maximum SRP adsorption capacity (Q) of 17.5 mg g-1, followed by Scheelite tailing (8.3 mg g-1) and Planosol (7.7 mg g-1). Scheelite tailing, Planosol and LMB increased the pH of the water. After treatment to reduce humic substances, Planosol showed a Q of 22.3 mg g-1 while Luvisol produced 11.1mg g-1. Reducing the amount of humic substances potentiated the sorption process in the Planosol. However, the isotherms of untreated Luvisol and treated Planosol have not reached equilibrium and therefore may be overestimated. Conclusions The precipitation process was probably the main sorption mechanism, being more expressive than adsorption. Scheelite tailing was the most promising material for eutrophic environments because it is alkaline, calcium-rich, and this capacity will probably remain high under anoxic conditions. It also has a small amount of organic matter and, consequently, contains less humic substances. The quality of the clay present in natural adsorbents was more important than quantity in the sorption process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西半干旱区天然吸附材料控制富营养化的磷吸附潜力
摘要:目的研究巴西半干旱区三种天然磷吸附剂(Luvisol、Planosol和白钨矿尾矿)对可溶性活性磷(SRP)的吸附性能。方法采用天然吸附剂和镧改性膨润土(LMB)在pH 8条件下进行吸附试验。研究了腐殖质对SRP吸附的影响。为此,将Luvisol和Planosol焚烧以减少其腐殖质成分,并进行了新的吸附试验。还评价了吸附剂对水pH的影响。结果天然吸附剂在pH为8时具有较高的SRP吸附电位。天然吸附剂中,Luvisol对SRP的最大吸附量(Q)为17.5 mg g-1,其次是白钨矿尾矿(8.3 mg g-1)和Planosol (7.7 mg g-1)。白钨矿尾矿、Planosol和LMB均使水体pH值升高。经还原腐殖质处理后,Planosol的Q值为22.3 mg g-1, Luvisol的Q值为11.1mg g-1。减少腐殖质物质的数量增强了Planosol中的吸附过程。然而,未经处理的Luvisol和处理过的Planosol的等温线尚未达到平衡,因此可能被高估。结论沉淀过程可能是主要的吸附机制,比吸附过程更具表现力。白钨矿尾矿是富营养化环境中最有前途的材料,因为它是碱性的,富含钙,并且在缺氧条件下这种能力可能会保持很高。它还含有少量的有机物,因此含有较少的腐殖质物质。在吸附过程中,天然吸附剂中粘土的质量比吸附量更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia
Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
Length-weight relationship of fishes from an estuary of Abrolhos Bank, Brazil Reviewing the organic matter processing by wetlands A global review on invasive traits of macrophytes and their link to invasion success Incorporating symmetrical and asymmetrical dispersal into Ecological Niche Models in freshwater environments Impacts of extreme precipitation events in water quality: a scientometric analysis in global scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1