UNDERSTANDING OF KANT’S TRANSCENDENTALISM BY KAZAN PHILOSOPHERS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY

O. Poroshenko
{"title":"UNDERSTANDING OF KANT’S TRANSCENDENTALISM BY KAZAN PHILOSOPHERS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY","authors":"O. Poroshenko","doi":"10.18384/2310-7227-2020-1-67-74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although Kant's anthropology in its “pure form” was the “Copernican revolution” in the history of European philosophy, it did not become an independent approach in Russian philosophical thought of the 19th-20th centuries. Purpose. The purpose of this article is to analyze the ideas of Kant's transcendentalism widely discussed in the works of some Kazan philosophers of the beginning of the 20th century. This discussion was mostly conducted in the framework of anthropological discourse. Methodology and Approach. The article studies the ideas of V. Ivanovsky, A. Makovelsky and K. Sotonin from the angle of their reception of transcendental concepts in psychological and empirical contexts. 1 © Порошенко О . Ю ., 2020 . ISSN 2072-8530 Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Серия: Философские науки 2020 / No 1 68 Results. The analysis showed, that V. Ivanovsky enriched his theory of associationism due to the transcendentalism of I. Kant, A. Makovelsky relied in his procedural theory of “soul” on the Kantian arguments of D. Hume's criticism and K. Sotonin posed a new epistemological problem, complementing Kant’s classification of the objects of judgment. An overview of these concepts is presented in this","PeriodicalId":33732,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta Seriia Filosofskie nauki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta Seriia Filosofskie nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7227-2020-1-67-74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although Kant's anthropology in its “pure form” was the “Copernican revolution” in the history of European philosophy, it did not become an independent approach in Russian philosophical thought of the 19th-20th centuries. Purpose. The purpose of this article is to analyze the ideas of Kant's transcendentalism widely discussed in the works of some Kazan philosophers of the beginning of the 20th century. This discussion was mostly conducted in the framework of anthropological discourse. Methodology and Approach. The article studies the ideas of V. Ivanovsky, A. Makovelsky and K. Sotonin from the angle of their reception of transcendental concepts in psychological and empirical contexts. 1 © Порошенко О . Ю ., 2020 . ISSN 2072-8530 Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Серия: Философские науки 2020 / No 1 68 Results. The analysis showed, that V. Ivanovsky enriched his theory of associationism due to the transcendentalism of I. Kant, A. Makovelsky relied in his procedural theory of “soul” on the Kantian arguments of D. Hume's criticism and K. Sotonin posed a new epistemological problem, complementing Kant’s classification of the objects of judgment. An overview of these concepts is presented in this
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
20世纪初喀山哲学家对康德先验主义的理解
虽然康德的“纯粹形式”的人类学是欧洲哲学史上的“哥白尼式革命”,但它并没有成为19 -20世纪俄国哲学思想中的一种独立的方法。目的。本文的目的是分析20世纪初喀山哲学家著作中广泛讨论的康德先验主义思想。这一讨论主要是在人类学话语的框架内进行的。方法论和方法。本文从心理学和经验主义语境中对先验概念的接受角度,对伊万诺夫斯基、马可夫斯基和索托宁的思想进行了研究。1©Порошенко О。Ю ., 2020。ISSN 2072 - 8530ВестникМосковскогогосударственногообластногоуниверситета。Серия: Философские науки 2020 / No . 68结果。分析表明,伊万诺夫斯基由于康德的先验主义而丰富了他的联想主义理论,马可夫斯基的“灵魂”程序论依赖于休谟批判的康德论证,索托宁提出了新的认识论问题,补充了康德对判断对象的分类。本文概述了这些概念
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Improvement of Object Classification in Systems Theory Russian Philosophy in School as an Important Factor in the Formation of the Modern Progressive World View Philosophy of Life from Arthur Schopenhauer to Boris Pasternak Pedagogy in German Enlightenment in the History of Philosophy: Moses Mendelssohn and Johann Bernhard Basedow Scientific Knowledge and Value Limitation: A Social and Philosophical Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1